xref: /sqlite-3.40.0/test/having.test (revision 8dfde89b)
1# 2017 April 30
2#
3# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
4# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
5#
6#    May you do good and not evil.
7#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
8#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
9#
10#***********************************************************************
11#
12# Test the HAVING->WHERE optimization.
13#
14
15set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
16source $testdir/tester.tcl
17set testprefix having
18
19do_execsql_test 1.0 {
20  CREATE TABLE t2(c, d);
21
22  CREATE TABLE t1(a, b);
23  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 1);
24  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 2);
25  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 3);
26  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 4);
27  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 5);
28  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 6);
29} {}
30
31foreach {tn sql res} {
32  1 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a HAVING a=2" {2 12}
33  2 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a HAVING a=2 AND sum(b)>10" {2 12}
34  3 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a HAVING sum(b)>12" {}
35} {
36  do_execsql_test 1.$tn $sql $res
37}
38
39# Run an EXPLAIN command for both SQL statements. Return true if
40# the outputs are identical, or false otherwise.
41#
42proc compare_vdbe {sql1 sql2} {
43  set r1 [list]
44  set r2 [list]
45  db eval "explain $sql1" { lappend r1 $opcode $p1 $p2 $p3 $p4 $p5}
46  db eval "explain $sql2" { lappend r2 $opcode $p1 $p2 $p3 $p4 $p5}
47  return [expr {$r1==$r2}]
48}
49
50proc do_compare_vdbe_test {tn sql1 sql2 res} {
51  uplevel [list do_test $tn [list compare_vdbe $sql1 $sql2] $res]
52}
53
54#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
55# Test that various statements that are eligible for the optimization
56# produce the same VDBE code as optimizing by hand does.
57#
58foreach {tn sql1 sql2} {
59  1 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a HAVING a=2"
60    "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE a=2 GROUP BY a"
61
62  2 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a HAVING sum(b)>5 AND a=2"
63    "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE a=2 GROUP BY a HAVING sum(b)>5"
64
65  3 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a COLLATE binary HAVING a=2"
66    "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE a=2 GROUP BY a COLLATE binary"
67
68  4 {
69      SELECT x,y FROM (
70        SELECT a AS x, sum(b) AS y FROM t1
71        GROUP BY a
72      ) WHERE x BETWEEN 8888 AND 9999
73    } {
74      SELECT x,y FROM (
75        SELECT a AS x, sum(b) AS y FROM t1
76        WHERE x BETWEEN 8888 AND 9999
77        GROUP BY a
78      )
79    }
80
81  5 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a COLLATE binary HAVING 0"
82    "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE 0 GROUP BY a COLLATE binary"
83
84  6 "SELECT count(*) FROM t1,t2 WHERE a=c GROUP BY b, d HAVING b=d"
85    "SELECT count(*) FROM t1,t2 WHERE a=c AND b=d GROUP BY b, d"
86
87  7 {
88      SELECT count(*) FROM t1,t2 WHERE a=c GROUP BY b, d
89      HAVING b=d COLLATE nocase
90    } {
91      SELECT count(*) FROM t1,t2 WHERE a=c AND b=d COLLATE nocase
92      GROUP BY b, d
93    }
94
95  8 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a||b HAVING substr(a||b, 1, 1)='a'"
96    "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE substr(a||b, 1, 1)='a' GROUP BY a||b"
97} {
98  do_compare_vdbe_test 2.$tn $sql1 $sql2 1
99}
100
101#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
102# 1: Test that the optimization is only applied if the GROUP BY term
103#    uses BINARY collation.
104#
105# 2: Not applied if there is a non-deterministic function in the HAVING
106#    term.
107#
108foreach {tn sql1 sql2} {
109  1 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a COLLATE nocase HAVING a=2"
110    "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE a=2 GROUP BY a COLLATE nocase"
111
112  2 "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a HAVING randomblob(a)<X'88'"
113    "SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t1 WHERE randomblob(a)<X'88' GROUP BY a"
114} {
115  do_compare_vdbe_test 3.$tn $sql1 $sql2 0
116}
117
118
119#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
120# Test that non-deterministic functions disqualify a term from being
121# moved from the HAVING to WHERE clause.
122#
123do_execsql_test 4.1 {
124  CREATE TABLE t3(a, b);
125  INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1, 1);
126  INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1, 2);
127  INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1, 3);
128  INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(2, 1);
129  INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(2, 2);
130  INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(2, 3);
131}
132
133proc nondeter {args} {
134  incr ::nondeter_ret
135  expr {$::nondeter_ret % 2}
136}
137db func nondeter nondeter
138
139set ::nondeter_ret 0
140do_execsql_test 4.2 {
141  SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t3 GROUP BY a HAVING nondeter(a)
142} {1 6}
143
144# If the term where moved, the query above would return the same
145# result as the following. But it does not.
146#
147set ::nondeter_ret 0
148do_execsql_test 4.3 {
149  SELECT a, sum(b) FROM t3 WHERE nondeter(a) GROUP BY a
150} {1 4 2 2}
151
152
153finish_test
154