1 //===-- InstructionPrecedenceTracking.cpp -----------------------*- C++ -*-===// 2 // 3 // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure 4 // 5 // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source 6 // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. 7 // 8 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// 9 // Implements a class that is able to define some instructions as "special" 10 // (e.g. as having implicit control flow, or writing memory, or having another 11 // interesting property) and then efficiently answers queries of the types: 12 // 1. Are there any special instructions in the block of interest? 13 // 2. Return first of the special instructions in the given block; 14 // 3. Check if the given instruction is preceeded by the first special 15 // instruction in the same block. 16 // The class provides caching that allows to answer these queries quickly. The 17 // user must make sure that the cached data is invalidated properly whenever 18 // a content of some tracked block is changed. 19 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// 20 21 #include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionPrecedenceTracking.h" 22 #include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h" 23 24 using namespace llvm; 25 26 #ifndef NDEBUG 27 static cl::opt<bool> ExpensiveAsserts( 28 "ipt-expensive-asserts", 29 cl::desc("Perform expensive assert validation on every query to Instruction" 30 " Precedence Tracking"), 31 cl::init(false), cl::Hidden); 32 #endif 33 34 const Instruction *InstructionPrecedenceTracking::getFirstSpecialInstruction( 35 const BasicBlock *BB) { 36 #ifndef NDEBUG 37 // If there is a bug connected to invalid cache, turn on ExpensiveAsserts to 38 // catch this situation as early as possible. 39 if (ExpensiveAsserts) 40 validateAll(); 41 else 42 validate(BB); 43 #endif 44 45 if (FirstSpecialInsts.find(BB) == FirstSpecialInsts.end()) { 46 fill(BB); 47 assert(FirstSpecialInsts.find(BB) != FirstSpecialInsts.end() && "Must be!"); 48 } 49 return FirstSpecialInsts[BB]; 50 } 51 52 bool InstructionPrecedenceTracking::hasSpecialInstructions( 53 const BasicBlock *BB) { 54 return getFirstSpecialInstruction(BB) != nullptr; 55 } 56 57 bool InstructionPrecedenceTracking::isPreceededBySpecialInstruction( 58 const Instruction *Insn) { 59 const Instruction *MaybeFirstSpecial = 60 getFirstSpecialInstruction(Insn->getParent()); 61 return MaybeFirstSpecial && OI.dominates(MaybeFirstSpecial, Insn); 62 } 63 64 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::fill(const BasicBlock *BB) { 65 FirstSpecialInsts.erase(BB); 66 for (auto &I : *BB) 67 if (isSpecialInstruction(&I)) { 68 FirstSpecialInsts[BB] = &I; 69 return; 70 } 71 72 // Mark this block as having no special instructions. 73 FirstSpecialInsts[BB] = nullptr; 74 } 75 76 #ifndef NDEBUG 77 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::validate(const BasicBlock *BB) const { 78 auto It = FirstSpecialInsts.find(BB); 79 // Bail if we don't have anything cached for this block. 80 if (It == FirstSpecialInsts.end()) 81 return; 82 83 for (const Instruction &Insn : *BB) 84 if (isSpecialInstruction(&Insn)) { 85 assert(It->second == &Insn && 86 "Cached first special instruction is wrong!"); 87 return; 88 } 89 90 assert(It->second == nullptr && 91 "Block is marked as having special instructions but in fact it has " 92 "none!"); 93 } 94 95 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::validateAll() const { 96 // Check that for every known block the cached value is correct. 97 for (auto &It : FirstSpecialInsts) 98 validate(It.first); 99 } 100 #endif 101 102 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::invalidateBlock(const BasicBlock *BB) { 103 OI.invalidateBlock(BB); 104 FirstSpecialInsts.erase(BB); 105 } 106 107 void InstructionPrecedenceTracking::clear() { 108 for (auto It : FirstSpecialInsts) 109 OI.invalidateBlock(It.first); 110 FirstSpecialInsts.clear(); 111 #ifndef NDEBUG 112 // The map should be valid after clearing (at least empty). 113 validateAll(); 114 #endif 115 } 116 117 bool ImplicitControlFlowTracking::isSpecialInstruction( 118 const Instruction *Insn) const { 119 // If a block's instruction doesn't always pass the control to its successor 120 // instruction, mark the block as having implicit control flow. We use them 121 // to avoid wrong assumptions of sort "if A is executed and B post-dominates 122 // A, then B is also executed". This is not true is there is an implicit 123 // control flow instruction (e.g. a guard) between them. 124 // 125 // TODO: Currently, isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor returns false 126 // for volatile stores and loads because they can trap. The discussion on 127 // whether or not it is correct is still ongoing. We might want to get rid 128 // of this logic in the future. Anyways, trapping instructions shouldn't 129 // introduce implicit control flow, so we explicitly allow them here. This 130 // must be removed once isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor is fixed. 131 if (isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor(Insn)) 132 return false; 133 if (isa<LoadInst>(Insn)) { 134 assert(cast<LoadInst>(Insn)->isVolatile() && 135 "Non-volatile load should transfer execution to successor!"); 136 return false; 137 } 138 if (isa<StoreInst>(Insn)) { 139 assert(cast<StoreInst>(Insn)->isVolatile() && 140 "Non-volatile store should transfer execution to successor!"); 141 return false; 142 } 143 return true; 144 } 145