1================================
2Source Level Debugging with LLVM
3================================
4
5.. contents::
6   :local:
7
8Introduction
9============
10
11This document is the central repository for all information pertaining to debug
12information in LLVM.  It describes the :ref:`actual format that the LLVM debug
13information takes <format>`, which is useful for those interested in creating
14front-ends or dealing directly with the information.  Further, this document
15provides specific examples of what debug information for C/C++ looks like.
16
17Philosophy behind LLVM debugging information
18--------------------------------------------
19
20The idea of the LLVM debugging information is to capture how the important
21pieces of the source-language's Abstract Syntax Tree map onto LLVM code.
22Several design aspects have shaped the solution that appears here.  The
23important ones are:
24
25* Debugging information should have very little impact on the rest of the
26  compiler.  No transformations, analyses, or code generators should need to
27  be modified because of debugging information.
28
29* LLVM optimizations should interact in :ref:`well-defined and easily described
30  ways <intro_debugopt>` with the debugging information.
31
32* Because LLVM is designed to support arbitrary programming languages,
33  LLVM-to-LLVM tools should not need to know anything about the semantics of
34  the source-level-language.
35
36* Source-level languages are often **widely** different from one another.
37  LLVM should not put any restrictions of the flavor of the source-language,
38  and the debugging information should work with any language.
39
40* With code generator support, it should be possible to use an LLVM compiler
41  to compile a program to native machine code and standard debugging
42  formats.  This allows compatibility with traditional machine-code level
43  debuggers, like GDB or DBX.
44
45The approach used by the LLVM implementation is to use a small set of
46:ref:`intrinsic functions <format_common_intrinsics>` to define a mapping
47between LLVM program objects and the source-level objects.  The description of
48the source-level program is maintained in LLVM metadata in an
49:ref:`implementation-defined format <ccxx_frontend>` (the C/C++ front-end
50currently uses working draft 7 of the `DWARF 3 standard
51<http://www.eagercon.com/dwarf/dwarf3std.htm>`_).
52
53When a program is being debugged, a debugger interacts with the user and turns
54the stored debug information into source-language specific information.  As
55such, a debugger must be aware of the source-language, and is thus tied to a
56specific language or family of languages.
57
58Debug information consumers
59---------------------------
60
61The role of debug information is to provide meta information normally stripped
62away during the compilation process.  This meta information provides an LLVM
63user a relationship between generated code and the original program source
64code.
65
66Currently, there are two backend consumers of debug info: DwarfDebug and
67CodeViewDebug. DwarfDebug produces DWARF suitable for use with GDB, LLDB, and
68other DWARF-based debuggers. :ref:`CodeViewDebug <codeview>` produces CodeView,
69the Microsoft debug info format, which is usable with Microsoft debuggers such
70as Visual Studio and WinDBG. LLVM's debug information format is mostly derived
71from and inspired by DWARF, but it is feasible to translate into other target
72debug info formats such as STABS.
73
74It would also be reasonable to use debug information to feed profiling tools
75for analysis of generated code, or, tools for reconstructing the original
76source from generated code.
77
78.. _intro_debugopt:
79
80Debug information and optimizations
81-----------------------------------
82
83An extremely high priority of LLVM debugging information is to make it interact
84well with optimizations and analysis.  In particular, the LLVM debug
85information provides the following guarantees:
86
87* LLVM debug information **always provides information to accurately read
88  the source-level state of the program**, regardless of which LLVM
89  optimizations have been run. :doc:`HowToUpdateDebugInfo` specifies how debug
90  info should be updated in various kinds of code transformations to avoid
91  breaking this guarantee, and how to preserve as much useful debug info as
92  possible.  Note that some optimizations may impact the ability to modify the
93  current state of the program with a debugger, such as setting program
94  variables, or calling functions that have been deleted.
95
96* As desired, LLVM optimizations can be upgraded to be aware of debugging
97  information, allowing them to update the debugging information as they
98  perform aggressive optimizations.  This means that, with effort, the LLVM
99  optimizers could optimize debug code just as well as non-debug code.
100
101* LLVM debug information does not prevent optimizations from
102  happening (for example inlining, basic block reordering/merging/cleanup,
103  tail duplication, etc).
104
105* LLVM debug information is automatically optimized along with the rest of
106  the program, using existing facilities.  For example, duplicate
107  information is automatically merged by the linker, and unused information
108  is automatically removed.
109
110Basically, the debug information allows you to compile a program with
111"``-O0 -g``" and get full debug information, allowing you to arbitrarily modify
112the program as it executes from a debugger.  Compiling a program with
113"``-O3 -g``" gives you full debug information that is always available and
114accurate for reading (e.g., you get accurate stack traces despite tail call
115elimination and inlining), but you might lose the ability to modify the program
116and call functions which were optimized out of the program, or inlined away
117completely.
118
119The :doc:`LLVM test-suite <TestSuiteMakefileGuide>` provides a framework to
120test the optimizer's handling of debugging information.  It can be run like
121this:
122
123.. code-block:: bash
124
125  % cd llvm/projects/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks  # or some other level
126  % make TEST=dbgopt
127
128This will test impact of debugging information on optimization passes.  If
129debugging information influences optimization passes then it will be reported
130as a failure.  See :doc:`TestingGuide` for more information on LLVM test
131infrastructure and how to run various tests.
132
133.. _format:
134
135Debugging information format
136============================
137
138LLVM debugging information has been carefully designed to make it possible for
139the optimizer to optimize the program and debugging information without
140necessarily having to know anything about debugging information.  In
141particular, the use of metadata avoids duplicated debugging information from
142the beginning, and the global dead code elimination pass automatically deletes
143debugging information for a function if it decides to delete the function.
144
145To do this, most of the debugging information (descriptors for types,
146variables, functions, source files, etc) is inserted by the language front-end
147in the form of LLVM metadata.
148
149Debug information is designed to be agnostic about the target debugger and
150debugging information representation (e.g. DWARF/Stabs/etc).  It uses a generic
151pass to decode the information that represents variables, types, functions,
152namespaces, etc: this allows for arbitrary source-language semantics and
153type-systems to be used, as long as there is a module written for the target
154debugger to interpret the information.
155
156To provide basic functionality, the LLVM debugger does have to make some
157assumptions about the source-level language being debugged, though it keeps
158these to a minimum.  The only common features that the LLVM debugger assumes
159exist are `source files <LangRef.html#difile>`_, and `program objects
160<LangRef.html#diglobalvariable>`_.  These abstract objects are used by a
161debugger to form stack traces, show information about local variables, etc.
162
163This section of the documentation first describes the representation aspects
164common to any source-language.  :ref:`ccxx_frontend` describes the data layout
165conventions used by the C and C++ front-ends.
166
167Debug information descriptors are `specialized metadata nodes
168<LangRef.html#specialized-metadata>`_, first-class subclasses of ``Metadata``.
169
170.. _format_common_intrinsics:
171
172Debugger intrinsic functions
173----------------------------
174
175LLVM uses several intrinsic functions (name prefixed with "``llvm.dbg``") to
176track source local variables through optimization and code generation.
177
178``llvm.dbg.addr``
179^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
180
181.. code-block:: llvm
182
183  void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata, metadata, metadata)
184
185This intrinsic provides information about a local element (e.g., variable).
186The first argument is metadata holding the address of variable, typically a
187static alloca in the function entry block.  The second argument is a
188`local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a description of
189the variable.  The third argument is a `complex expression
190<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_.  An `llvm.dbg.addr` intrinsic describes the
191*address* of a source variable.
192
193.. code-block:: text
194
195    %i.addr = alloca i32, align 4
196    call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata i32* %i.addr, metadata !1,
197                             metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !2
198    !1 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i
199    !2 = !DILocation(...)
200    ...
201    %buffer = alloca [256 x i8], align 8
202    ; The address of i is buffer+64.
203    call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata [256 x i8]* %buffer, metadata !3,
204                             metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus, 64)), !dbg !4
205    !3 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i
206    !4 = !DILocation(...)
207
208A frontend should generate exactly one call to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` at the point
209of declaration of a source variable. Optimization passes that fully promote the
210variable from memory to SSA values will replace this call with possibly
211multiple calls to `llvm.dbg.value`. Passes that delete stores are effectively
212partial promotion, and they will insert a mix of calls to ``llvm.dbg.value``
213and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` to track the source variable value when it is available.
214After optimization, there may be multiple calls to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` describing
215the program points where the variables lives in memory. All calls for the same
216concrete source variable must agree on the memory location.
217
218
219``llvm.dbg.declare``
220^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
221
222.. code-block:: llvm
223
224  void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata)
225
226This intrinsic is identical to `llvm.dbg.addr`, except that there can only be
227one call to `llvm.dbg.declare` for a given concrete `local variable
228<LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_. It is not control-dependent, meaning that if
229a call to `llvm.dbg.declare` exists and has a valid location argument, that
230address is considered to be the true home of the variable across its entire
231lifetime. This makes it hard for optimizations to preserve accurate debug info
232in the presence of ``llvm.dbg.declare``, so we are transitioning away from it,
233and we plan to deprecate it in future LLVM releases.
234
235
236``llvm.dbg.value``
237^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
238
239.. code-block:: llvm
240
241  void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, metadata, metadata)
242
243This intrinsic provides information when a user source variable is set to a new
244value.  The first argument is the new value (wrapped as metadata).  The second
245argument is a `local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a
246description of the variable.  The third argument is a `complex expression
247<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_.
248
249An `llvm.dbg.value` intrinsic describes the *value* of a source variable
250directly, not its address.  Note that the value operand of this intrinsic may
251be indirect (i.e, a pointer to the source variable), provided that interpreting
252the complex expression derives the direct value.
253
254Object lifetimes and scoping
255============================
256
257In many languages, the local variables in functions can have their lifetimes or
258scopes limited to a subset of a function.  In the C family of languages, for
259example, variables are only live (readable and writable) within the source
260block that they are defined in.  In functional languages, values are only
261readable after they have been defined.  Though this is a very obvious concept,
262it is non-trivial to model in LLVM, because it has no notion of scoping in this
263sense, and does not want to be tied to a language's scoping rules.
264
265In order to handle this, the LLVM debug format uses the metadata attached to
266llvm instructions to encode line number and scoping information.  Consider the
267following C fragment, for example:
268
269.. code-block:: c
270
271  1.  void foo() {
272  2.    int X = 21;
273  3.    int Y = 22;
274  4.    {
275  5.      int Z = 23;
276  6.      Z = X;
277  7.    }
278  8.    X = Y;
279  9.  }
280
281.. FIXME: Update the following example to use llvm.dbg.addr once that is the
282   default in clang.
283
284Compiled to LLVM, this function would be represented like this:
285
286.. code-block:: text
287
288  ; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable
289  define void @foo() #0 !dbg !4 {
290  entry:
291    %X = alloca i32, align 4
292    %Y = alloca i32, align 4
293    %Z = alloca i32, align 4
294    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !13
295    store i32 21, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !13
296    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Y, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !15
297    store i32 22, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !15
298    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !16, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !18
299    store i32 23, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !18
300    %0 = load i32, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !19
301    store i32 %0, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !20
302    %1 = load i32, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !21
303    store i32 %1, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !22
304    ret void, !dbg !23
305  }
306
307  ; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
308  declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) #1
309
310  attributes #0 = { nounwind ssp uwtable "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "frame-pointer"="all" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" }
311  attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone }
312
313  !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0}
314  !llvm.module.flags = !{!7, !8, !9}
315  !llvm.ident = !{!10}
316
317  !0 = !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)", isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !2, subprograms: !3, globals: !2, imports: !2)
318  !1 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin", directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info")
319  !2 = !{}
320  !3 = !{!4}
321  !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2)
322  !5 = !DISubroutineType(types: !6)
323  !6 = !{null}
324  !7 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 2}
325  !8 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
326  !9 = !{i32 1, !"PIC Level", i32 2}
327  !10 = !{!"clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)"}
328  !11 = !DILocalVariable(name: "X", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 2, type: !12)
329  !12 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, align: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed)
330  !13 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4)
331  !14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Y", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 3, type: !12)
332  !15 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 9, scope: !4)
333  !16 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Z", scope: !17, file: !1, line: 5, type: !12)
334  !17 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5)
335  !18 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !17)
336  !19 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 11, scope: !17)
337  !20 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 9, scope: !17)
338  !21 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 9, scope: !4)
339  !22 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 7, scope: !4)
340  !23 = !DILocation(line: 9, column: 3, scope: !4)
341
342
343This example illustrates a few important details about LLVM debugging
344information.  In particular, it shows how the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic and
345location information, which are attached to an instruction, are applied
346together to allow a debugger to analyze the relationship between statements,
347variable definitions, and the code used to implement the function.
348
349.. code-block:: llvm
350
351  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !13
352    ; [debug line = 2:7] [debug variable = X]
353
354The first intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for the
355variable ``X``.  The metadata ``!dbg !13`` attached to the intrinsic provides
356scope information for the variable ``X``.
357
358.. code-block:: text
359
360  !13 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4)
361  !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5,
362                              isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1,
363                              isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2)
364
365Here ``!13`` is metadata providing `location information
366<LangRef.html#dilocation>`_.  In this example, scope is encoded by ``!4``, a
367`subprogram descriptor <LangRef.html#disubprogram>`_.  This way the location
368information attached to the intrinsics indicates that the variable ``X`` is
369declared at line number 2 at a function level scope in function ``foo``.
370
371Now lets take another example.
372
373.. code-block:: llvm
374
375  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !16, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !18
376    ; [debug line = 5:9] [debug variable = Z]
377
378The third intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for
379variable ``Z``.  The metadata ``!dbg !18`` attached to the intrinsic provides
380scope information for the variable ``Z``.
381
382.. code-block:: text
383
384  !17 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5)
385  !18 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !17)
386
387Here ``!18`` indicates that ``Z`` is declared at line number 5 and column
388number 11 inside of lexical scope ``!17``.  The lexical scope itself resides
389inside of subprogram ``!4`` described above.
390
391The scope information attached with each instruction provides a straightforward
392way to find instructions covered by a scope.
393
394Object lifetime in optimized code
395=================================
396
397In the example above, every variable assignment uniquely corresponds to a
398memory store to the variable's position on the stack. However in heavily
399optimized code LLVM promotes most variables into SSA values, which can
400eventually be placed in physical registers or memory locations. To track SSA
401values through compilation, when objects are promoted to SSA values an
402``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic is created for each assignment, recording the
403variable's new location. Compared with the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic:
404
405* A dbg.value terminates the effect of any preceding dbg.values for (any
406  overlapping fragments of) the specified variable.
407* The dbg.value's position in the IR defines where in the instruction stream
408  the variable's value changes.
409* Operands can be constants, indicating the variable is assigned a
410  constant value.
411
412Care must be taken to update ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics when optimization
413passes alter or move instructions and blocks -- the developer could observe such
414changes reflected in the value of variables when debugging the program. For any
415execution of the optimized program, the set of variable values presented to the
416developer by the debugger should not show a state that would never have existed
417in the execution of the unoptimized program, given the same input. Doing so
418risks misleading the developer by reporting a state that does not exist,
419damaging their understanding of the optimized program and undermining their
420trust in the debugger.
421
422Sometimes perfectly preserving variable locations is not possible, often when a
423redundant calculation is optimized out. In such cases, a ``llvm.dbg.value``
424with operand ``undef`` should be used, to terminate earlier variable locations
425and let the debugger present ``optimized out`` to the developer. Withholding
426these potentially stale variable values from the developer diminishes the
427amount of available debug information, but increases the reliability of the
428remaining information.
429
430To illustrate some potential issues, consider the following example:
431
432.. code-block:: llvm
433
434  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
435  entry:
436    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2)
437    br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr
438  truebr:
439    %tval = add i32 %bar, 1
440    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %tval, metadata !1, metadata !2)
441    %g1 = call i32 @gazonk()
442    br label %exit
443  falsebr:
444    %fval = add i32 %bar, 2
445    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %fval, metadata !1, metadata !2)
446    %g2 = call i32 @gazonk()
447    br label %exit
448  exit:
449    %merge = phi [ %tval, %truebr ], [ %fval, %falsebr ]
450    %g = phi [ %g1, %truebr ], [ %g2, %falsebr ]
451    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %merge, metadata !1, metadata !2)
452    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2)
453    %plusten = add i32 %merge, 10
454    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
455    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2)
456    ret i32 %toret
457  }
458
459Containing two source-level variables in ``!1`` and ``!3``. The function could,
460perhaps, be optimized into the following code:
461
462.. code-block:: llvm
463
464  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
465  entry:
466    %g = call i32 @gazonk()
467    %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12
468    %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper
469    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
470    ret i32 %toret
471  }
472
473What ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics should be placed to represent the original variable
474locations in this code? Unfortunately the second, third and fourth
475dbg.values for ``!1`` in the source function have had their operands
476(%tval, %fval, %merge) optimized out. Assuming we cannot recover them, we
477might consider this placement of dbg.values:
478
479.. code-block:: llvm
480
481  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
482  entry:
483    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2)
484    %g = call i32 @gazonk()
485    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2)
486    %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12
487    %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper
488    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
489    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2)
490    ret i32 %toret
491  }
492
493However, this will cause ``!3`` to have the return value of ``@gazonk()`` at
494the same time as ``!1`` has the constant value zero -- a pair of assignments
495that never occurred in the unoptimized program. To avoid this, we must terminate
496the range that ``!1`` has the constant value assignment by inserting an undef
497dbg.value before the dbg.value for ``!3``:
498
499.. code-block:: llvm
500
501  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
502  entry:
503    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2)
504    %g = call i32 @gazonk()
505    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 undef, metadata !1, metadata !2)
506    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2)
507    %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12
508    %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper
509    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
510    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2)
511    ret i32 %toret
512  }
513
514In general, if any dbg.value has its operand optimized out and cannot be
515recovered, then an undef dbg.value is necessary to terminate earlier variable
516locations. Additional undef dbg.values may be necessary when the debugger can
517observe re-ordering of assignments.
518
519How variable location metadata is transformed during CodeGen
520============================================================
521
522LLVM preserves debug information throughout mid-level and backend passes,
523ultimately producing a mapping between source-level information and
524instruction ranges. This
525is relatively straightforwards for line number information, as mapping
526instructions to line numbers is a simple association. For variable locations
527however the story is more complex. As each ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic
528represents a source-level assignment of a value to a source variable, the
529variable location intrinsics effectively embed a small imperative program
530within the LLVM IR. By the end of CodeGen, this becomes a mapping from each
531variable to their machine locations over ranges of instructions.
532From IR to object emission, the major transformations which affect variable
533location fidelity are:
534
5351. Instruction Selection
5362. Register allocation
5373. Block layout
538
539each of which are discussed below. In addition, instruction scheduling can
540significantly change the ordering of the program, and occurs in a number of
541different passes.
542
543Some variable locations are not transformed during CodeGen. Stack locations
544specified by ``llvm.dbg.declare`` are valid and unchanging for the entire
545duration of the function, and are recorded in a simple MachineFunction table.
546Location changes in the prologue and epilogue of a function are also ignored:
547frame setup and destruction may take several instructions, require a
548disproportionate amount of debugging information in the output binary to
549describe, and should be stepped over by debuggers anyway.
550
551Variable locations in Instruction Selection and MIR
552---------------------------------------------------
553
554Instruction selection creates a MIR function from an IR function, and just as
555it transforms ``intermediate`` instructions into machine instructions, so must
556``intermediate`` variable locations become machine variable locations.
557Within IR, variable locations are always identified by a Value, but in MIR
558there can be different types of variable locations. In addition, some IR
559locations become unavailable, for example if the operation of multiple IR
560instructions are combined into one machine instruction (such as
561multiply-and-accumulate) then intermediate Values are lost. To track variable
562locations through instruction selection, they are first separated into
563locations that do not depend on code generation (constants, stack locations,
564allocated virtual registers) and those that do. For those that do, debug
565metadata is attached to SDNodes in SelectionDAGs. After instruction selection
566has occurred and a MIR function is created, if the SDNode associated with debug
567metadata is allocated a virtual register, that virtual register is used as the
568variable location. If the SDNode is folded into a machine instruction or
569otherwise transformed into a non-register, the variable location becomes
570unavailable.
571
572Locations that are unavailable are treated as if they have been optimized out:
573in IR the location would be assigned ``undef`` by a debug intrinsic, and in MIR
574the equivalent location is used.
575
576After MIR locations are assigned to each variable, machine pseudo-instructions
577corresponding to each ``llvm.dbg.value`` and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` intrinsic are
578inserted. There are two forms of this type of instruction.
579
580The first form, ``DBG_VALUE``, appears thus:
581
582.. code-block:: text
583
584  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !123, !DIExpression()
585
586And has the following operands:
587 * The first operand can record the variable location as a register,
588   a frame index, an immediate, or the base address register if the original
589   debug intrinsic referred to memory. ``$noreg`` indicates the variable
590   location is undefined, equivalent to an ``undef`` dbg.value operand.
591 * The type of the second operand indicates whether the variable location is
592   directly referred to by the DBG_VALUE, or whether it is indirect. The
593   ``$noreg`` register signifies the former, an immediate operand (0) the
594   latter.
595 * Operand 3 is the Variable field of the original debug intrinsic.
596 * Operand 4 is the Expression field of the original debug intrinsic.
597
598The second form, ``DBG_VALUE_LIST``, appears thus:
599
600.. code-block:: text
601
602  DBG_VALUE_LIST !123, !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0, DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 1, DW_OP_plus), %1, %2
603
604And has the following operands:
605 * The first operand is the Variable field of the original debug intrinsic.
606 * The second operand is the Expression field of the original debug intrinsic.
607 * Any number of operands, from the 3rd onwards, record a sequence of variable
608   location operands, which may take any of the same values as the first
609   operand of the ``DBG_VALUE`` instruction above. These variable location
610   operands are inserted into the final DWARF Expression in positions indicated
611   by the DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator in the `DIExpression
612   <LangRef.html#diexpression>`.
613
614The position at which the DBG_VALUEs are inserted should correspond to the
615positions of their matching ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics in the IR block.  As
616with optimization, LLVM aims to preserve the order in which variable
617assignments occurred in the source program. However SelectionDAG performs some
618instruction scheduling, which can reorder assignments (discussed below).
619Function parameter locations are moved to the beginning of the function if
620they're not already, to ensure they're immediately available on function entry.
621
622To demonstrate variable locations during instruction selection, consider
623the following example:
624
625.. code-block:: llvm
626
627  define i32 @foo(i32* %addr) {
628  entry:
629    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
630    br label %bb1, !dbg !5
631
632  bb1:                                              ; preds = %bb1, %entry
633    %bar.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %add, %bb1 ]
634    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %bar.0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
635    %addr1 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 1, !dbg !5
636    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr1, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
637    %loaded1 = load i32, i32* %addr1, !dbg !5
638    %addr2 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 %bar.0, !dbg !5
639    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr2, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
640    %loaded2 = load i32, i32* %addr2, !dbg !5
641    %add = add i32 %bar.0, 1, !dbg !5
642    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %add, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
643    %added = add i32 %loaded1, %loaded2
644    %cond = icmp ult i32 %added, %bar.0, !dbg !5
645    br i1 %cond, label %bb1, label %bb2, !dbg !5
646
647  bb2:                                              ; preds = %bb1
648    ret i32 0, !dbg !5
649  }
650
651If one compiles this IR with ``llc -o - -start-after=codegen-prepare -stop-after=expand-isel-pseudos -mtriple=x86_64--``, the following MIR is produced:
652
653.. code-block:: text
654
655  bb.0.entry:
656    successors: %bb.1(0x80000000)
657    liveins: $rdi
658
659    %2:gr64 = COPY $rdi
660    %3:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags
661    DBG_VALUE 0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
662
663  bb.1.bb1:
664    successors: %bb.1(0x7c000000), %bb.2(0x04000000)
665
666    %0:gr32 = PHI %3, %bb.0, %1, %bb.1
667    DBG_VALUE %0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
668    DBG_VALUE %2, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4, DW_OP_stack_value), debug-location !5
669    %4:gr32 = MOV32rm %2, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
670    %5:gr64_nosp = MOVSX64rr32 %0, debug-location !5
671    DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
672    %1:gr32 = INC32r %0, implicit-def dead $eflags, debug-location !5
673    DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
674    %6:gr32 = ADD32rm %4, %2, 4, killed %5, 0, $noreg, implicit-def dead $eflags :: (load 4 from %ir.addr2)
675    %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %0, implicit-def $eflags, debug-location !5
676    JB_1 %bb.1, implicit $eflags, debug-location !5
677    JMP_1 %bb.2, debug-location !5
678
679  bb.2.bb2:
680    %8:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags
681    $eax = COPY %8, debug-location !5
682    RET 0, $eax, debug-location !5
683
684Observe first that there is a DBG_VALUE instruction for every ``llvm.dbg.value``
685intrinsic in the source IR, ensuring no source level assignments go missing.
686Then consider the different ways in which variable locations have been recorded:
687
688* For the first dbg.value an immediate operand is used to record a zero value.
689* The dbg.value of the PHI instruction leads to a DBG_VALUE of virtual register
690  ``%0``.
691* The first GEP has its effect folded into the first load instruction
692  (as a 4-byte offset), but the variable location is salvaged by folding
693  the GEPs effect into the DIExpression.
694* The second GEP is also folded into the corresponding load. However, it is
695  insufficiently simple to be salvaged, and is emitted as a ``$noreg``
696  DBG_VALUE, indicating that the variable takes on an undefined location.
697* The final dbg.value has its Value placed in virtual register ``%1``.
698
699Instruction Scheduling
700----------------------
701
702A number of passes can reschedule instructions, notably instruction selection
703and the pre-and-post RA machine schedulers. Instruction scheduling can
704significantly change the nature of the program -- in the (very unlikely) worst
705case the instruction sequence could be completely reversed. In such
706circumstances LLVM follows the principle applied to optimizations, that it is
707better for the debugger not to display any state than a misleading state.
708Thus, whenever instructions are advanced in order of execution, any
709corresponding DBG_VALUE is kept in its original position, and if an instruction
710is delayed then the variable is given an undefined location for the duration
711of the delay. To illustrate, consider this pseudo-MIR:
712
713.. code-block:: text
714
715  %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
716  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2
717  %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags
718  DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4
719  %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags
720  DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6
721
722Imagine that the SUB32rr were moved forward to give us the following MIR:
723
724.. code-block:: text
725
726  %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags
727  %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
728  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2
729  %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags
730  DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4
731  DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6
732
733In this circumstance LLVM would leave the MIR as shown above. Were we to move
734the DBG_VALUE of virtual register %7 upwards with the SUB32rr, we would re-order
735assignments and introduce a new state of the program. Whereas with the solution
736above, the debugger will see one fewer combination of variable values, because
737``!3`` and ``!5`` will change value at the same time. This is preferred over
738misrepresenting the original program.
739
740In comparison, if one sunk the MOV32rm, LLVM would produce the following:
741
742.. code-block:: text
743
744  DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !1, !2
745  %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags
746  DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4
747  %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags
748  DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6
749  %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
750  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2
751
752Here, to avoid presenting a state in which the first assignment to ``!1``
753disappears, the DBG_VALUE at the top of the block assigns the variable the
754undefined location, until its value is available at the end of the block where
755an additional DBG_VALUE is added. Were any other DBG_VALUE for ``!1`` to occur
756in the instructions that the MOV32rm was sunk past, the DBG_VALUE for ``%1``
757would be dropped and the debugger would never observe it in the variable. This
758accurately reflects that the value is not available during the corresponding
759portion of the original program.
760
761Variable locations during Register Allocation
762---------------------------------------------
763
764To avoid debug instructions interfering with the register allocator, the
765LiveDebugVariables pass extracts variable locations from a MIR function and
766deletes the corresponding DBG_VALUE instructions. Some localized copy
767propagation is performed within blocks. After register allocation, the
768VirtRegRewriter pass re-inserts DBG_VALUE instructions in their original
769positions, translating virtual register references into their physical
770machine locations. To avoid encoding incorrect variable locations, in this
771pass any DBG_VALUE of a virtual register that is not live, is replaced by
772the undefined location. The LiveDebugVariables may insert redundant DBG_VALUEs
773because of virtual register rewriting. These will be subsequently removed by
774the RemoveRedundantDebugValues pass.
775
776LiveDebugValues expansion of variable locations
777-----------------------------------------------
778
779After all optimizations have run and shortly before emission, the
780LiveDebugValues pass runs to achieve two aims:
781
782* To propagate the location of variables through copies and register spills,
783* For every block, to record every valid variable location in that block.
784
785After this pass the DBG_VALUE instruction changes meaning: rather than
786corresponding to a source-level assignment where the variable may change value,
787it asserts the location of a variable in a block, and loses effect outside the
788block. Propagating variable locations through copies and spills is
789straightforwards: determining the variable location in every basic block
790requires the consideration of control flow. Consider the following IR, which
791presents several difficulties:
792
793.. code-block:: text
794
795  define dso_local i32 @foo(i1 %cond, i32 %input) !dbg !12 {
796  entry:
797    br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr
798
799  bb1:
800    %value = phi i32 [ %value1, %truebr ], [ %value2, %falsebr ]
801    br label %exit, !dbg !26
802
803  truebr:
804    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !23
805    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 1, metadata !22, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !23
806    %value1 = add i32 %input, 1
807    br label %bb1
808
809  falsebr:
810    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !23
811    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 2, metadata !22, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !23
812    %value = add i32 %input, 2
813    br label %bb1
814
815  exit:
816    ret i32 %value, !dbg !30
817  }
818
819Here the difficulties are:
820
821* The control flow is roughly the opposite of basic block order
822* The value of the ``!22`` variable merges into ``%bb1``, but there is no PHI
823  node
824
825As mentioned above, the ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics essentially form an
826imperative program embedded in the IR, with each intrinsic defining a variable
827location. This *could* be converted to an SSA form by mem2reg, in the same way
828that it uses use-def chains to identify control flow merges and insert phi
829nodes for IR Values. However, because debug variable locations are defined for
830every machine instruction, in effect every IR instruction uses every variable
831location, which would lead to a large number of debugging intrinsics being
832generated.
833
834Examining the example above, variable ``!30`` is assigned ``%input`` on both
835conditional paths through the function, while ``!22`` is assigned differing
836constant values on either path. Where control flow merges in ``%bb1`` we would
837want ``!30`` to keep its location (``%input``), but ``!22`` to become undefined
838as we cannot determine at runtime what value it should have in %bb1 without
839inserting a PHI node. mem2reg does not insert the PHI node to avoid changing
840codegen when debugging is enabled, and does not insert the other dbg.values
841to avoid adding very large numbers of intrinsics.
842
843Instead, LiveDebugValues determines variable locations when control
844flow merges. A dataflow analysis is used to propagate locations between blocks:
845when control flow merges, if a variable has the same location in all
846predecessors then that location is propagated into the successor. If the
847predecessor locations disagree, the location becomes undefined.
848
849Once LiveDebugValues has run, every block should have all valid variable
850locations described by DBG_VALUE instructions within the block. Very little
851effort is then required by supporting classes (such as
852DbgEntityHistoryCalculator) to build a map of each instruction to every
853valid variable location, without the need to consider control flow. From
854the example above, it is otherwise difficult to determine that the location
855of variable ``!30`` should flow "up" into block ``%bb1``, but that the location
856of variable ``!22`` should not flow "down" into the ``%exit`` block.
857
858.. _ccxx_frontend:
859
860C/C++ front-end specific debug information
861==========================================
862
863The C and C++ front-ends represent information about the program in a
864format that is effectively identical to `DWARF <http://www.dwarfstd.org/>`_
865in terms of information content.  This allows code generators to
866trivially support native debuggers by generating standard dwarf
867information, and contains enough information for non-dwarf targets to
868translate it as needed.
869
870This section describes the forms used to represent C and C++ programs.  Other
871languages could pattern themselves after this (which itself is tuned to
872representing programs in the same way that DWARF does), or they could choose
873to provide completely different forms if they don't fit into the DWARF model.
874As support for debugging information gets added to the various LLVM
875source-language front-ends, the information used should be documented here.
876
877The following sections provide examples of a few C/C++ constructs and
878the debug information that would best describe those constructs.  The
879canonical references are the ``DINode`` classes defined in
880``include/llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h`` and the implementations of the
881helper functions in ``lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp``.
882
883C/C++ source file information
884-----------------------------
885
886``llvm::Instruction`` provides easy access to metadata attached with an
887instruction.  One can extract line number information encoded in LLVM IR using
888``Instruction::getDebugLoc()`` and ``DILocation::getLine()``.
889
890.. code-block:: c++
891
892  if (DILocation *Loc = I->getDebugLoc()) { // Here I is an LLVM instruction
893    unsigned Line = Loc->getLine();
894    StringRef File = Loc->getFilename();
895    StringRef Dir = Loc->getDirectory();
896    bool ImplicitCode = Loc->isImplicitCode();
897  }
898
899When the flag ImplicitCode is true then it means that the Instruction has been
900added by the front-end but doesn't correspond to source code written by the user. For example
901
902.. code-block:: c++
903
904  if (MyBoolean) {
905    MyObject MO;
906    ...
907  }
908
909At the end of the scope the MyObject's destructor is called but it isn't written
910explicitly. This information is useful to avoid to have counters on brackets when
911making code coverage.
912
913C/C++ global variable information
914---------------------------------
915
916Given an integer global variable declared as follows:
917
918.. code-block:: c
919
920  _Alignas(8) int MyGlobal = 100;
921
922a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors:
923
924.. code-block:: text
925
926  ;;
927  ;; Define the global itself.
928  ;;
929  @MyGlobal = global i32 100, align 8, !dbg !0
930
931  ;;
932  ;; List of debug info of globals
933  ;;
934  !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1}
935
936  ;; Some unrelated metadata.
937  !llvm.module.flags = !{!6, !7}
938  !llvm.ident = !{!8}
939
940  ;; Define the global variable itself
941  !0 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(name: "MyGlobal", scope: !1, file: !2, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, align: 64)
942
943  ;; Define the compile unit.
944  !1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2,
945                               producer: "clang version 4.0.0",
946                               isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug,
947                               enums: !3, globals: !4)
948
949  ;;
950  ;; Define the file
951  ;;
952  !2 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin",
953               directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info")
954
955  ;; An empty array.
956  !3 = !{}
957
958  ;; The Array of Global Variables
959  !4 = !{!0}
960
961  ;;
962  ;; Define the type
963  ;;
964  !5 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed)
965
966  ;; Dwarf version to output.
967  !6 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 4}
968
969  ;; Debug info schema version.
970  !7 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
971
972  ;; Compiler identification
973  !8 = !{!"clang version 4.0.0"}
974
975
976The align value in DIGlobalVariable description specifies variable alignment in
977case it was forced by C11 _Alignas(), C++11 alignas() keywords or compiler
978attribute __attribute__((aligned ())). In other case (when this field is missing)
979alignment is considered default. This is used when producing DWARF output
980for DW_AT_alignment value.
981
982C/C++ function information
983--------------------------
984
985Given a function declared as follows:
986
987.. code-block:: c
988
989  int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
990    return 0;
991  }
992
993a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors:
994
995.. code-block:: text
996
997  ;;
998  ;; Define the anchor for subprograms.
999  ;;
1000  !4 = !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5,
1001                     isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1,
1002                     flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false,
1003                     retainedNodes: !2)
1004
1005  ;;
1006  ;; Define the subprogram itself.
1007  ;;
1008  define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** %argv) !dbg !4 {
1009  ...
1010  }
1011
1012C++ specific debug information
1013==============================
1014
1015C++ special member functions information
1016----------------------------------------
1017
1018DWARF v5 introduces attributes defined to enhance debugging information of C++ programs. LLVM can generate (or omit) these appropriate DWARF attributes. In C++ a special member function Ctors, Dtors, Copy/Move Ctors, assignment operators can be declared with C++11 keyword deleted. This is represented in LLVM using spFlags value DISPFlagDeleted.
1019
1020Given a class declaration with copy constructor declared as deleted:
1021
1022.. code-block:: c
1023
1024  class foo {
1025   public:
1026     foo(const foo&) = deleted;
1027  };
1028
1029A C++ frontend would generate following:
1030
1031.. code-block:: text
1032
1033  !17 = !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !11, file: !1, line: 5, type: !18, scopeLine: 5, flags: DIFlagPublic | DIFlagPrototyped, spFlags: DISPFlagDeleted)
1034
1035and this will produce an additional DWARF attribute as:
1036
1037.. code-block:: text
1038
1039  DW_TAG_subprogram [7] *
1040    DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strx1]    (indexed (00000006) string = "foo")
1041    DW_AT_decl_line [DW_FORM_data1]       (5)
1042    ...
1043    DW_AT_deleted [DW_FORM_flag_present]  (true)
1044
1045Fortran specific debug information
1046==================================
1047
1048Fortran function information
1049----------------------------
1050
1051There are a few DWARF attributes defined to support client debugging of Fortran programs.  LLVM can generate (or omit) the appropriate DWARF attributes for the prefix-specs of ELEMENTAL, PURE, IMPURE, RECURSIVE, and NON_RECURSIVE.  This is done by using the spFlags values: DISPFlagElemental, DISPFlagPure, and DISPFlagRecursive.
1052
1053.. code-block:: fortran
1054
1055  elemental function elem_func(a)
1056
1057a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors:
1058
1059.. code-block:: text
1060
1061  !11 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "subroutine2", scope: !1, file: !1,
1062          line: 5, type: !8, scopeLine: 6,
1063          spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition | DISPFlagElemental, unit: !0,
1064          retainedNodes: !2)
1065
1066and this will materialize an additional DWARF attribute as:
1067
1068.. code-block:: text
1069
1070  DW_TAG_subprogram [3]
1071     DW_AT_low_pc [DW_FORM_addr]     (0x0000000000000010 ".text")
1072     DW_AT_high_pc [DW_FORM_data4]   (0x00000001)
1073     ...
1074     DW_AT_elemental [DW_FORM_flag_present]  (true)
1075
1076There are a few DWARF tags defined to represent Fortran specific constructs i.e DW_TAG_string_type for representing Fortran character(n). In LLVM this is represented as DIStringType.
1077
1078.. code-block:: fortran
1079
1080  character(len=*), intent(in) :: string
1081
1082a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors:
1083
1084.. code-block:: text
1085
1086  !DILocalVariable(name: "string", arg: 1, scope: !10, file: !3, line: 4, type: !15)
1087  !DIStringType(name: "character(*)!2", stringLength: !16, stringLengthExpression: !DIExpression(), size: 32)
1088
1089and this will materialize in DWARF tags as:
1090
1091.. code-block:: text
1092
1093   DW_TAG_string_type
1094                DW_AT_name      ("character(*)!2")
1095                DW_AT_string_length     (0x00000064)
1096   0x00000064:    DW_TAG_variable
1097                  DW_AT_location      (DW_OP_fbreg +16)
1098                  DW_AT_type  (0x00000083 "integer*8")
1099                  ...
1100                  DW_AT_artificial    (true)
1101
1102Debugging information format
1103============================
1104
1105Debugging Information Extension for Objective C Properties
1106----------------------------------------------------------
1107
1108Introduction
1109^^^^^^^^^^^^
1110
1111Objective C provides a simpler way to declare and define accessor methods using
1112declared properties.  The language provides features to declare a property and
1113to let compiler synthesize accessor methods.
1114
1115The debugger lets developer inspect Objective C interfaces and their instance
1116variables and class variables.  However, the debugger does not know anything
1117about the properties defined in Objective C interfaces.  The debugger consumes
1118information generated by compiler in DWARF format.  The format does not support
1119encoding of Objective C properties.  This proposal describes DWARF extensions to
1120encode Objective C properties, which the debugger can use to let developers
1121inspect Objective C properties.
1122
1123Proposal
1124^^^^^^^^
1125
1126Objective C properties exist separately from class members.  A property can be
1127defined only by "setter" and "getter" selectors, and be calculated anew on each
1128access.  Or a property can just be a direct access to some declared ivar.
1129Finally it can have an ivar "automatically synthesized" for it by the compiler,
1130in which case the property can be referred to in user code directly using the
1131standard C dereference syntax as well as through the property "dot" syntax, but
1132there is no entry in the ``@interface`` declaration corresponding to this ivar.
1133
1134To facilitate debugging, these properties we will add a new DWARF TAG into the
1135``DW_TAG_structure_type`` definition for the class to hold the description of a
1136given property, and a set of DWARF attributes that provide said description.
1137The property tag will also contain the name and declared type of the property.
1138
1139If there is a related ivar, there will also be a DWARF property attribute placed
1140in the ``DW_TAG_member`` DIE for that ivar referring back to the property TAG
1141for that property.  And in the case where the compiler synthesizes the ivar
1142directly, the compiler is expected to generate a ``DW_TAG_member`` for that
1143ivar (with the ``DW_AT_artificial`` set to 1), whose name will be the name used
1144to access this ivar directly in code, and with the property attribute pointing
1145back to the property it is backing.
1146
1147The following examples will serve as illustration for our discussion:
1148
1149.. code-block:: objc
1150
1151  @interface I1 {
1152    int n2;
1153  }
1154
1155  @property int p1;
1156  @property int p2;
1157  @end
1158
1159  @implementation I1
1160  @synthesize p1;
1161  @synthesize p2 = n2;
1162  @end
1163
1164This produces the following DWARF (this is a "pseudo dwarfdump" output):
1165
1166.. code-block:: none
1167
1168  0x00000100:  TAG_structure_type [7] *
1169                 AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 )
1170                 AT_name( "I1" )
1171                 AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" )
1172                 AT_decl_line( 3 )
1173
1174  0x00000110    TAG_APPLE_property
1175                  AT_name ( "p1" )
1176                  AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1177
1178  0x00000120:   TAG_APPLE_property
1179                  AT_name ( "p2" )
1180                  AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1181
1182  0x00000130:   TAG_member [8]
1183                  AT_name( "_p1" )
1184                  AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000110} "p1" )
1185                  AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1186                  AT_artificial ( 0x1 )
1187
1188  0x00000140:    TAG_member [8]
1189                   AT_name( "n2" )
1190                   AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000120} "p2" )
1191                   AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1192
1193  0x00000150:  AT_type( ( int ) )
1194
1195Note, the current convention is that the name of the ivar for an
1196auto-synthesized property is the name of the property from which it derives
1197with an underscore prepended, as is shown in the example.  But we actually
1198don't need to know this convention, since we are given the name of the ivar
1199directly.
1200
1201Also, it is common practice in ObjC to have different property declarations in
1202the @interface and @implementation - e.g. to provide a read-only property in
1203the interface, and a read-write interface in the implementation.  In that case,
1204the compiler should emit whichever property declaration will be in force in the
1205current translation unit.
1206
1207Developers can decorate a property with attributes which are encoded using
1208``DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute``.
1209
1210.. code-block:: objc
1211
1212  @property (readonly, nonatomic) int pr;
1213
1214.. code-block:: none
1215
1216  TAG_APPLE_property [8]
1217    AT_name( "pr" )
1218    AT_type ( {0x00000147} (int) )
1219    AT_APPLE_property_attribute (DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly, DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic)
1220
1221The setter and getter method names are attached to the property using
1222``DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter`` and ``DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter`` attributes.
1223
1224.. code-block:: objc
1225
1226  @interface I1
1227  @property (setter=myOwnP3Setter:) int p3;
1228  -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a;
1229  @end
1230
1231  @implementation I1
1232  @synthesize p3;
1233  -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a{ }
1234  @end
1235
1236The DWARF for this would be:
1237
1238.. code-block:: none
1239
1240  0x000003bd: TAG_structure_type [7] *
1241                AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 )
1242                AT_name( "I1" )
1243                AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" )
1244                AT_decl_line( 3 )
1245
1246  0x000003cd      TAG_APPLE_property
1247                    AT_name ( "p3" )
1248                    AT_APPLE_property_setter ( "myOwnP3Setter:" )
1249                    AT_type( {0x00000147} ( int ) )
1250
1251  0x000003f3:     TAG_member [8]
1252                    AT_name( "_p3" )
1253                    AT_type ( {0x00000147} ( int ) )
1254                    AT_APPLE_property ( {0x000003cd} )
1255                    AT_artificial ( 0x1 )
1256
1257New DWARF Tags
1258^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1259
1260+-----------------------+--------+
1261| TAG                   | Value  |
1262+=======================+========+
1263| DW_TAG_APPLE_property | 0x4200 |
1264+-----------------------+--------+
1265
1266New DWARF Attributes
1267^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1268
1269+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1270| Attribute                      | Value  | Classes   |
1271+================================+========+===========+
1272| DW_AT_APPLE_property           | 0x3fed | Reference |
1273+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1274| DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter    | 0x3fe9 | String    |
1275+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1276| DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter    | 0x3fea | String    |
1277+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1278| DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute | 0x3feb | Constant  |
1279+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1280
1281New DWARF Constants
1282^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1283
1284+--------------------------------------+-------+
1285| Name                                 | Value |
1286+======================================+=======+
1287| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly           | 0x01  |
1288+--------------------------------------+-------+
1289| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_getter             | 0x02  |
1290+--------------------------------------+-------+
1291| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_assign             | 0x04  |
1292+--------------------------------------+-------+
1293| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readwrite          | 0x08  |
1294+--------------------------------------+-------+
1295| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_retain             | 0x10  |
1296+--------------------------------------+-------+
1297| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_copy               | 0x20  |
1298+--------------------------------------+-------+
1299| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic          | 0x40  |
1300+--------------------------------------+-------+
1301| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_setter             | 0x80  |
1302+--------------------------------------+-------+
1303| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_atomic             | 0x100 |
1304+--------------------------------------+-------+
1305| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_weak               | 0x200 |
1306+--------------------------------------+-------+
1307| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_strong             | 0x400 |
1308+--------------------------------------+-------+
1309| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_unsafe_unretained  | 0x800 |
1310+--------------------------------------+-------+
1311| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nullability        | 0x1000|
1312+--------------------------------------+-------+
1313| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_null_resettable    | 0x2000|
1314+--------------------------------------+-------+
1315| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_class              | 0x4000|
1316+--------------------------------------+-------+
1317
1318Name Accelerator Tables
1319-----------------------
1320
1321Introduction
1322^^^^^^^^^^^^
1323
1324The "``.debug_pubnames``" and "``.debug_pubtypes``" formats are not what a
1325debugger needs.  The "``pub``" in the section name indicates that the entries
1326in the table are publicly visible names only.  This means no static or hidden
1327functions show up in the "``.debug_pubnames``".  No static variables or private
1328class variables are in the "``.debug_pubtypes``".  Many compilers add different
1329things to these tables, so we can't rely upon the contents between gcc, icc, or
1330clang.
1331
1332The typical query given by users tends not to match up with the contents of
1333these tables.  For example, the DWARF spec states that "In the case of the name
1334of a function member or static data member of a C++ structure, class or union,
1335the name presented in the "``.debug_pubnames``" section is not the simple name
1336given by the ``DW_AT_name attribute`` of the referenced debugging information
1337entry, but rather the fully qualified name of the data or function member."
1338So the only names in these tables for complex C++ entries is a fully
1339qualified name.  Debugger users tend not to enter their search strings as
1340"``a::b::c(int,const Foo&) const``", but rather as "``c``", "``b::c``" , or
1341"``a::b::c``".  So the name entered in the name table must be demangled in
1342order to chop it up appropriately and additional names must be manually entered
1343into the table to make it effective as a name lookup table for debuggers to
1344use.
1345
1346All debuggers currently ignore the "``.debug_pubnames``" table as a result of
1347its inconsistent and useless public-only name content making it a waste of
1348space in the object file.  These tables, when they are written to disk, are not
1349sorted in any way, leaving every debugger to do its own parsing and sorting.
1350These tables also include an inlined copy of the string values in the table
1351itself making the tables much larger than they need to be on disk, especially
1352for large C++ programs.
1353
1354Can't we just fix the sections by adding all of the names we need to this
1355table? No, because that is not what the tables are defined to contain and we
1356won't know the difference between the old bad tables and the new good tables.
1357At best we could make our own renamed sections that contain all of the data we
1358need.
1359
1360These tables are also insufficient for what a debugger like LLDB needs.  LLDB
1361uses clang for its expression parsing where LLDB acts as a PCH.  LLDB is then
1362often asked to look for type "``foo``" or namespace "``bar``", or list items in
1363namespace "``baz``".  Namespaces are not included in the pubnames or pubtypes
1364tables.  Since clang asks a lot of questions when it is parsing an expression,
1365we need to be very fast when looking up names, as it happens a lot.  Having new
1366accelerator tables that are optimized for very quick lookups will benefit this
1367type of debugging experience greatly.
1368
1369We would like to generate name lookup tables that can be mapped into memory
1370from disk, and used as is, with little or no up-front parsing.  We would also
1371be able to control the exact content of these different tables so they contain
1372exactly what we need.  The Name Accelerator Tables were designed to fix these
1373issues.  In order to solve these issues we need to:
1374
1375* Have a format that can be mapped into memory from disk and used as is
1376* Lookups should be very fast
1377* Extensible table format so these tables can be made by many producers
1378* Contain all of the names needed for typical lookups out of the box
1379* Strict rules for the contents of tables
1380
1381Table size is important and the accelerator table format should allow the reuse
1382of strings from common string tables so the strings for the names are not
1383duplicated.  We also want to make sure the table is ready to be used as-is by
1384simply mapping the table into memory with minimal header parsing.
1385
1386The name lookups need to be fast and optimized for the kinds of lookups that
1387debuggers tend to do.  Optimally we would like to touch as few parts of the
1388mapped table as possible when doing a name lookup and be able to quickly find
1389the name entry we are looking for, or discover there are no matches.  In the
1390case of debuggers we optimized for lookups that fail most of the time.
1391
1392Each table that is defined should have strict rules on exactly what is in the
1393accelerator tables and documented so clients can rely on the content.
1394
1395Hash Tables
1396^^^^^^^^^^^
1397
1398Standard Hash Tables
1399""""""""""""""""""""
1400
1401Typical hash tables have a header, buckets, and each bucket points to the
1402bucket contents:
1403
1404.. code-block:: none
1405
1406  .------------.
1407  |  HEADER    |
1408  |------------|
1409  |  BUCKETS   |
1410  |------------|
1411  |  DATA      |
1412  `------------'
1413
1414The BUCKETS are an array of offsets to DATA for each hash:
1415
1416.. code-block:: none
1417
1418  .------------.
1419  | 0x00001000 | BUCKETS[0]
1420  | 0x00002000 | BUCKETS[1]
1421  | 0x00002200 | BUCKETS[2]
1422  | 0x000034f0 | BUCKETS[3]
1423  |            | ...
1424  | 0xXXXXXXXX | BUCKETS[n_buckets]
1425  '------------'
1426
1427So for ``bucket[3]`` in the example above, we have an offset into the table
14280x000034f0 which points to a chain of entries for the bucket.  Each bucket must
1429contain a next pointer, full 32 bit hash value, the string itself, and the data
1430for the current string value.
1431
1432.. code-block:: none
1433
1434              .------------.
1435  0x000034f0: | 0x00003500 | next pointer
1436              | 0x12345678 | 32 bit hash
1437              | "erase"    | string value
1438              | data[n]    | HashData for this bucket
1439              |------------|
1440  0x00003500: | 0x00003550 | next pointer
1441              | 0x29273623 | 32 bit hash
1442              | "dump"     | string value
1443              | data[n]    | HashData for this bucket
1444              |------------|
1445  0x00003550: | 0x00000000 | next pointer
1446              | 0x82638293 | 32 bit hash
1447              | "main"     | string value
1448              | data[n]    | HashData for this bucket
1449              `------------'
1450
1451The problem with this layout for debuggers is that we need to optimize for the
1452negative lookup case where the symbol we're searching for is not present.  So
1453if we were to lookup "``printf``" in the table above, we would make a 32-bit
1454hash for "``printf``", it might match ``bucket[3]``.  We would need to go to
1455the offset 0x000034f0 and start looking to see if our 32 bit hash matches.  To
1456do so, we need to read the next pointer, then read the hash, compare it, and
1457skip to the next bucket.  Each time we are skipping many bytes in memory and
1458touching new pages just to do the compare on the full 32 bit hash.  All of
1459these accesses then tell us that we didn't have a match.
1460
1461Name Hash Tables
1462""""""""""""""""
1463
1464To solve the issues mentioned above we have structured the hash tables a bit
1465differently: a header, buckets, an array of all unique 32 bit hash values,
1466followed by an array of hash value data offsets, one for each hash value, then
1467the data for all hash values:
1468
1469.. code-block:: none
1470
1471  .-------------.
1472  |  HEADER     |
1473  |-------------|
1474  |  BUCKETS    |
1475  |-------------|
1476  |  HASHES     |
1477  |-------------|
1478  |  OFFSETS    |
1479  |-------------|
1480  |  DATA       |
1481  `-------------'
1482
1483The ``BUCKETS`` in the name tables are an index into the ``HASHES`` array.  By
1484making all of the full 32 bit hash values contiguous in memory, we allow
1485ourselves to efficiently check for a match while touching as little memory as
1486possible.  Most often checking the 32 bit hash values is as far as the lookup
1487goes.  If it does match, it usually is a match with no collisions.  So for a
1488table with "``n_buckets``" buckets, and "``n_hashes``" unique 32 bit hash
1489values, we can clarify the contents of the ``BUCKETS``, ``HASHES`` and
1490``OFFSETS`` as:
1491
1492.. code-block:: none
1493
1494  .-------------------------.
1495  |  HEADER.magic           | uint32_t
1496  |  HEADER.version         | uint16_t
1497  |  HEADER.hash_function   | uint16_t
1498  |  HEADER.bucket_count    | uint32_t
1499  |  HEADER.hashes_count    | uint32_t
1500  |  HEADER.header_data_len | uint32_t
1501  |  HEADER_DATA            | HeaderData
1502  |-------------------------|
1503  |  BUCKETS                | uint32_t[n_buckets] // 32 bit hash indexes
1504  |-------------------------|
1505  |  HASHES                 | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit hash values
1506  |-------------------------|
1507  |  OFFSETS                | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit offsets to hash value data
1508  |-------------------------|
1509  |  ALL HASH DATA          |
1510  `-------------------------'
1511
1512So taking the exact same data from the standard hash example above we end up
1513with:
1514
1515.. code-block:: none
1516
1517              .------------.
1518              | HEADER     |
1519              |------------|
1520              |          0 | BUCKETS[0]
1521              |          2 | BUCKETS[1]
1522              |          5 | BUCKETS[2]
1523              |          6 | BUCKETS[3]
1524              |            | ...
1525              |        ... | BUCKETS[n_buckets]
1526              |------------|
1527              | 0x........ | HASHES[0]
1528              | 0x........ | HASHES[1]
1529              | 0x........ | HASHES[2]
1530              | 0x........ | HASHES[3]
1531              | 0x........ | HASHES[4]
1532              | 0x........ | HASHES[5]
1533              | 0x12345678 | HASHES[6]    hash for BUCKETS[3]
1534              | 0x29273623 | HASHES[7]    hash for BUCKETS[3]
1535              | 0x82638293 | HASHES[8]    hash for BUCKETS[3]
1536              | 0x........ | HASHES[9]
1537              | 0x........ | HASHES[10]
1538              | 0x........ | HASHES[11]
1539              | 0x........ | HASHES[12]
1540              | 0x........ | HASHES[13]
1541              | 0x........ | HASHES[n_hashes]
1542              |------------|
1543              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[0]
1544              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[1]
1545              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[2]
1546              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[3]
1547              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[4]
1548              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[5]
1549              | 0x000034f0 | OFFSETS[6]   offset for BUCKETS[3]
1550              | 0x00003500 | OFFSETS[7]   offset for BUCKETS[3]
1551              | 0x00003550 | OFFSETS[8]   offset for BUCKETS[3]
1552              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[9]
1553              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[10]
1554              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[11]
1555              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[12]
1556              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[13]
1557              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[n_hashes]
1558              |------------|
1559              |            |
1560              |            |
1561              |            |
1562              |            |
1563              |            |
1564              |------------|
1565  0x000034f0: | 0x00001203 | .debug_str ("erase")
1566              | 0x00000004 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "erase"
1567              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1568              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1569              | 0x........ | HashData[2]
1570              | 0x........ | HashData[3]
1571              | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash)
1572              |------------|
1573  0x00003500: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("collision")
1574              | 0x00000002 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "collision"
1575              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1576              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1577              | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("dump")
1578              | 0x00000003 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "dump"
1579              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1580              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1581              | 0x........ | HashData[2]
1582              | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash)
1583              |------------|
1584  0x00003550: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("main")
1585              | 0x00000009 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "main"
1586              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1587              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1588              | 0x........ | HashData[2]
1589              | 0x........ | HashData[3]
1590              | 0x........ | HashData[4]
1591              | 0x........ | HashData[5]
1592              | 0x........ | HashData[6]
1593              | 0x........ | HashData[7]
1594              | 0x........ | HashData[8]
1595              | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash)
1596              `------------'
1597
1598So we still have all of the same data, we just organize it more efficiently for
1599debugger lookup.  If we repeat the same "``printf``" lookup from above, we
1600would hash "``printf``" and find it matches ``BUCKETS[3]`` by taking the 32 bit
1601hash value and modulo it by ``n_buckets``.  ``BUCKETS[3]`` contains "6" which
1602is the index into the ``HASHES`` table.  We would then compare any consecutive
160332 bit hashes values in the ``HASHES`` array as long as the hashes would be in
1604``BUCKETS[3]``.  We do this by verifying that each subsequent hash value modulo
1605``n_buckets`` is still 3.  In the case of a failed lookup we would access the
1606memory for ``BUCKETS[3]``, and then compare a few consecutive 32 bit hashes
1607before we know that we have no match.  We don't end up marching through
1608multiple words of memory and we really keep the number of processor data cache
1609lines being accessed as small as possible.
1610
1611The string hash that is used for these lookup tables is the Daniel J.
1612Bernstein hash which is also used in the ELF ``GNU_HASH`` sections.  It is a
1613very good hash for all kinds of names in programs with very few hash
1614collisions.
1615
1616Empty buckets are designated by using an invalid hash index of ``UINT32_MAX``.
1617
1618Details
1619^^^^^^^
1620
1621These name hash tables are designed to be generic where specializations of the
1622table get to define additional data that goes into the header ("``HeaderData``"),
1623how the string value is stored ("``KeyType``") and the content of the data for each
1624hash value.
1625
1626Header Layout
1627"""""""""""""
1628
1629The header has a fixed part, and the specialized part.  The exact format of the
1630header is:
1631
1632.. code-block:: c
1633
1634  struct Header
1635  {
1636    uint32_t   magic;           // 'HASH' magic value to allow endian detection
1637    uint16_t   version;         // Version number
1638    uint16_t   hash_function;   // The hash function enumeration that was used
1639    uint32_t   bucket_count;    // The number of buckets in this hash table
1640    uint32_t   hashes_count;    // The total number of unique hash values and hash data offsets in this table
1641    uint32_t   header_data_len; // The bytes to skip to get to the hash indexes (buckets) for correct alignment
1642                                // Specifically the length of the following HeaderData field - this does not
1643                                // include the size of the preceding fields
1644    HeaderData header_data;     // Implementation specific header data
1645  };
1646
1647The header starts with a 32 bit "``magic``" value which must be ``'HASH'``
1648encoded as an ASCII integer.  This allows the detection of the start of the
1649hash table and also allows the table's byte order to be determined so the table
1650can be correctly extracted.  The "``magic``" value is followed by a 16 bit
1651``version`` number which allows the table to be revised and modified in the
1652future.  The current version number is 1. ``hash_function`` is a ``uint16_t``
1653enumeration that specifies which hash function was used to produce this table.
1654The current values for the hash function enumerations include:
1655
1656.. code-block:: c
1657
1658  enum HashFunctionType
1659  {
1660    eHashFunctionDJB = 0u, // Daniel J Bernstein hash function
1661  };
1662
1663``bucket_count`` is a 32 bit unsigned integer that represents how many buckets
1664are in the ``BUCKETS`` array.  ``hashes_count`` is the number of unique 32 bit
1665hash values that are in the ``HASHES`` array, and is the same number of offsets
1666are contained in the ``OFFSETS`` array.  ``header_data_len`` specifies the size
1667in bytes of the ``HeaderData`` that is filled in by specialized versions of
1668this table.
1669
1670Fixed Lookup
1671""""""""""""
1672
1673The header is followed by the buckets, hashes, offsets, and hash value data.
1674
1675.. code-block:: c
1676
1677  struct FixedTable
1678  {
1679    uint32_t buckets[Header.bucket_count];  // An array of hash indexes into the "hashes[]" array below
1680    uint32_t hashes [Header.hashes_count];  // Every unique 32 bit hash for the entire table is in this table
1681    uint32_t offsets[Header.hashes_count];  // An offset that corresponds to each item in the "hashes[]" array above
1682  };
1683
1684``buckets`` is an array of 32 bit indexes into the ``hashes`` array.  The
1685``hashes`` array contains all of the 32 bit hash values for all names in the
1686hash table.  Each hash in the ``hashes`` table has an offset in the ``offsets``
1687array that points to the data for the hash value.
1688
1689This table setup makes it very easy to repurpose these tables to contain
1690different data, while keeping the lookup mechanism the same for all tables.
1691This layout also makes it possible to save the table to disk and map it in
1692later and do very efficient name lookups with little or no parsing.
1693
1694DWARF lookup tables can be implemented in a variety of ways and can store a lot
1695of information for each name.  We want to make the DWARF tables extensible and
1696able to store the data efficiently so we have used some of the DWARF features
1697that enable efficient data storage to define exactly what kind of data we store
1698for each name.
1699
1700The ``HeaderData`` contains a definition of the contents of each HashData chunk.
1701We might want to store an offset to all of the debug information entries (DIEs)
1702for each name.  To keep things extensible, we create a list of items, or
1703Atoms, that are contained in the data for each name.  First comes the type of
1704the data in each atom:
1705
1706.. code-block:: c
1707
1708  enum AtomType
1709  {
1710    eAtomTypeNULL       = 0u,
1711    eAtomTypeDIEOffset  = 1u,   // DIE offset, check form for encoding
1712    eAtomTypeCUOffset   = 2u,   // DIE offset of the compiler unit header that contains the item in question
1713    eAtomTypeTag        = 3u,   // DW_TAG_xxx value, should be encoded as DW_FORM_data1 (if no tags exceed 255) or DW_FORM_data2
1714    eAtomTypeNameFlags  = 4u,   // Flags from enum NameFlags
1715    eAtomTypeTypeFlags  = 5u,   // Flags from enum TypeFlags
1716  };
1717
1718The enumeration values and their meanings are:
1719
1720.. code-block:: none
1721
1722  eAtomTypeNULL       - a termination atom that specifies the end of the atom list
1723  eAtomTypeDIEOffset  - an offset into the .debug_info section for the DWARF DIE for this name
1724  eAtomTypeCUOffset   - an offset into the .debug_info section for the CU that contains the DIE
1725  eAtomTypeDIETag     - The DW_TAG_XXX enumeration value so you don't have to parse the DWARF to see what it is
1726  eAtomTypeNameFlags  - Flags for functions and global variables (isFunction, isInlined, isExternal...)
1727  eAtomTypeTypeFlags  - Flags for types (isCXXClass, isObjCClass, ...)
1728
1729Then we allow each atom type to define the atom type and how the data for each
1730atom type data is encoded:
1731
1732.. code-block:: c
1733
1734  struct Atom
1735  {
1736    uint16_t type;  // AtomType enum value
1737    uint16_t form;  // DWARF DW_FORM_XXX defines
1738  };
1739
1740The ``form`` type above is from the DWARF specification and defines the exact
1741encoding of the data for the Atom type.  See the DWARF specification for the
1742``DW_FORM_`` definitions.
1743
1744.. code-block:: c
1745
1746  struct HeaderData
1747  {
1748    uint32_t die_offset_base;
1749    uint32_t atom_count;
1750    Atoms    atoms[atom_count0];
1751  };
1752
1753``HeaderData`` defines the base DIE offset that should be added to any atoms
1754that are encoded using the ``DW_FORM_ref1``, ``DW_FORM_ref2``,
1755``DW_FORM_ref4``, ``DW_FORM_ref8`` or ``DW_FORM_ref_udata``.  It also defines
1756what is contained in each ``HashData`` object -- ``Atom.form`` tells us how large
1757each field will be in the ``HashData`` and the ``Atom.type`` tells us how this data
1758should be interpreted.
1759
1760For the current implementations of the "``.apple_names``" (all functions +
1761globals), the "``.apple_types``" (names of all types that are defined), and
1762the "``.apple_namespaces``" (all namespaces), we currently set the ``Atom``
1763array to be:
1764
1765.. code-block:: c
1766
1767  HeaderData.atom_count = 1;
1768  HeaderData.atoms[0].type = eAtomTypeDIEOffset;
1769  HeaderData.atoms[0].form = DW_FORM_data4;
1770
1771This defines the contents to be the DIE offset (eAtomTypeDIEOffset) that is
1772encoded as a 32 bit value (DW_FORM_data4).  This allows a single name to have
1773multiple matching DIEs in a single file, which could come up with an inlined
1774function for instance.  Future tables could include more information about the
1775DIE such as flags indicating if the DIE is a function, method, block,
1776or inlined.
1777
1778The KeyType for the DWARF table is a 32 bit string table offset into the
1779".debug_str" table.  The ".debug_str" is the string table for the DWARF which
1780may already contain copies of all of the strings.  This helps make sure, with
1781help from the compiler, that we reuse the strings between all of the DWARF
1782sections and keeps the hash table size down.  Another benefit to having the
1783compiler generate all strings as DW_FORM_strp in the debug info, is that
1784DWARF parsing can be made much faster.
1785
1786After a lookup is made, we get an offset into the hash data.  The hash data
1787needs to be able to deal with 32 bit hash collisions, so the chunk of data
1788at the offset in the hash data consists of a triple:
1789
1790.. code-block:: c
1791
1792  uint32_t str_offset
1793  uint32_t hash_data_count
1794  HashData[hash_data_count]
1795
1796If "str_offset" is zero, then the bucket contents are done. 99.9% of the
1797hash data chunks contain a single item (no 32 bit hash collision):
1798
1799.. code-block:: none
1800
1801  .------------.
1802  | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main")
1803  | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count
1804  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset
1805  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset
1806  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset
1807  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset
1808  | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain)
1809  `------------'
1810
1811If there are collisions, you will have multiple valid string offsets:
1812
1813.. code-block:: none
1814
1815  .------------.
1816  | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main")
1817  | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count
1818  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset
1819  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset
1820  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset
1821  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset
1822  | 0x00002023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0002023] => "print")
1823  | 0x00000002 | uint32_t HashData count
1824  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset
1825  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset
1826  | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain)
1827  `------------'
1828
1829Current testing with real world C++ binaries has shown that there is around 1
183032 bit hash collision per 100,000 name entries.
1831
1832Contents
1833^^^^^^^^
1834
1835As we said, we want to strictly define exactly what is included in the
1836different tables.  For DWARF, we have 3 tables: "``.apple_names``",
1837"``.apple_types``", and "``.apple_namespaces``".
1838
1839"``.apple_names``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose
1840``DW_TAG`` is a ``DW_TAG_label``, ``DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine``, or
1841``DW_TAG_subprogram`` that has address attributes: ``DW_AT_low_pc``,
1842``DW_AT_high_pc``, ``DW_AT_ranges`` or ``DW_AT_entry_pc``.  It also contains
1843``DW_TAG_variable`` DIEs that have a ``DW_OP_addr`` in the location (global and
1844static variables).  All global and static variables should be included,
1845including those scoped within functions and classes.  For example using the
1846following code:
1847
1848.. code-block:: c
1849
1850  static int var = 0;
1851
1852  void f ()
1853  {
1854    static int var = 0;
1855  }
1856
1857Both of the static ``var`` variables would be included in the table.  All
1858functions should emit both their full names and their basenames.  For C or C++,
1859the full name is the mangled name (if available) which is usually in the
1860``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, and the ``DW_AT_name`` contains the
1861function basename.  If global or static variables have a mangled name in a
1862``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, this should be emitted along with the
1863simple name found in the ``DW_AT_name`` attribute.
1864
1865"``.apple_types``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose
1866tag is one of:
1867
1868* DW_TAG_array_type
1869* DW_TAG_class_type
1870* DW_TAG_enumeration_type
1871* DW_TAG_pointer_type
1872* DW_TAG_reference_type
1873* DW_TAG_string_type
1874* DW_TAG_structure_type
1875* DW_TAG_subroutine_type
1876* DW_TAG_typedef
1877* DW_TAG_union_type
1878* DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type
1879* DW_TAG_set_type
1880* DW_TAG_subrange_type
1881* DW_TAG_base_type
1882* DW_TAG_const_type
1883* DW_TAG_file_type
1884* DW_TAG_namelist
1885* DW_TAG_packed_type
1886* DW_TAG_volatile_type
1887* DW_TAG_restrict_type
1888* DW_TAG_atomic_type
1889* DW_TAG_interface_type
1890* DW_TAG_unspecified_type
1891* DW_TAG_shared_type
1892
1893Only entries with a ``DW_AT_name`` attribute are included, and the entry must
1894not be a forward declaration (``DW_AT_declaration`` attribute with a non-zero
1895value).  For example, using the following code:
1896
1897.. code-block:: c
1898
1899  int main ()
1900  {
1901    int *b = 0;
1902    return *b;
1903  }
1904
1905We get a few type DIEs:
1906
1907.. code-block:: none
1908
1909  0x00000067:     TAG_base_type [5]
1910                  AT_encoding( DW_ATE_signed )
1911                  AT_name( "int" )
1912                  AT_byte_size( 0x04 )
1913
1914  0x0000006e:     TAG_pointer_type [6]
1915                  AT_type( {0x00000067} ( int ) )
1916                  AT_byte_size( 0x08 )
1917
1918The DW_TAG_pointer_type is not included because it does not have a ``DW_AT_name``.
1919
1920"``.apple_namespaces``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_namespace`` DIEs.
1921If we run into a namespace that has no name this is an anonymous namespace, and
1922the name should be output as "``(anonymous namespace)``" (without the quotes).
1923Why?  This matches the output of the ``abi::cxa_demangle()`` that is in the
1924standard C++ library that demangles mangled names.
1925
1926
1927Language Extensions and File Format Changes
1928^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1929
1930Objective-C Extensions
1931""""""""""""""""""""""
1932
1933"``.apple_objc``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_subprogram`` DIEs for an
1934Objective-C class.  The name used in the hash table is the name of the
1935Objective-C class itself.  If the Objective-C class has a category, then an
1936entry is made for both the class name without the category, and for the class
1937name with the category.  So if we have a DIE at offset 0x1234 with a name of
1938method "``-[NSString(my_additions) stringWithSpecialString:]``", we would add
1939an entry for "``NSString``" that points to DIE 0x1234, and an entry for
1940"``NSString(my_additions)``" that points to 0x1234.  This allows us to quickly
1941track down all Objective-C methods for an Objective-C class when doing
1942expressions.  It is needed because of the dynamic nature of Objective-C where
1943anyone can add methods to a class.  The DWARF for Objective-C methods is also
1944emitted differently from C++ classes where the methods are not usually
1945contained in the class definition, they are scattered about across one or more
1946compile units.  Categories can also be defined in different shared libraries.
1947So we need to be able to quickly find all of the methods and class functions
1948given the Objective-C class name, or quickly find all methods and class
1949functions for a class + category name.  This table does not contain any
1950selector names, it just maps Objective-C class names (or class names +
1951category) to all of the methods and class functions.  The selectors are added
1952as function basenames in the "``.debug_names``" section.
1953
1954In the "``.apple_names``" section for Objective-C functions, the full name is
1955the entire function name with the brackets ("``-[NSString
1956stringWithCString:]``") and the basename is the selector only
1957("``stringWithCString:``").
1958
1959Mach-O Changes
1960""""""""""""""
1961
1962The sections names for the apple hash tables are for non-mach-o files.  For
1963mach-o files, the sections should be contained in the ``__DWARF`` segment with
1964names as follows:
1965
1966* "``.apple_names``" -> "``__apple_names``"
1967* "``.apple_types``" -> "``__apple_types``"
1968* "``.apple_namespaces``" -> "``__apple_namespac``" (16 character limit)
1969* "``.apple_objc``" -> "``__apple_objc``"
1970
1971.. _codeview:
1972
1973CodeView Debug Info Format
1974==========================
1975
1976LLVM supports emitting CodeView, the Microsoft debug info format, and this
1977section describes the design and implementation of that support.
1978
1979Format Background
1980-----------------
1981
1982CodeView as a format is clearly oriented around C++ debugging, and in C++, the
1983majority of debug information tends to be type information. Therefore, the
1984overriding design constraint of CodeView is the separation of type information
1985from other "symbol" information so that type information can be efficiently
1986merged across translation units. Both type information and symbol information is
1987generally stored as a sequence of records, where each record begins with a
198816-bit record size and a 16-bit record kind.
1989
1990Type information is usually stored in the ``.debug$T`` section of the object
1991file.  All other debug info, such as line info, string table, symbol info, and
1992inlinee info, is stored in one or more ``.debug$S`` sections. There may only be
1993one ``.debug$T`` section per object file, since all other debug info refers to
1994it. If a PDB (enabled by the ``/Zi`` MSVC option) was used during compilation,
1995the ``.debug$T`` section will contain only an ``LF_TYPESERVER2`` record pointing
1996to the PDB. When using PDBs, symbol information appears to remain in the object
1997file ``.debug$S`` sections.
1998
1999Type records are referred to by their index, which is the number of records in
2000the stream before a given record plus ``0x1000``. Many common basic types, such
2001as the basic integral types and unqualified pointers to them, are represented
2002using type indices less than ``0x1000``. Such basic types are built in to
2003CodeView consumers and do not require type records.
2004
2005Each type record may only contain type indices that are less than its own type
2006index. This ensures that the graph of type stream references is acyclic. While
2007the source-level type graph may contain cycles through pointer types (consider a
2008linked list struct), these cycles are removed from the type stream by always
2009referring to the forward declaration record of user-defined record types. Only
2010"symbol" records in the ``.debug$S`` streams may refer to complete,
2011non-forward-declaration type records.
2012
2013Working with CodeView
2014---------------------
2015
2016These are instructions for some common tasks for developers working to improve
2017LLVM's CodeView support. Most of them revolve around using the CodeView dumper
2018embedded in ``llvm-readobj``.
2019
2020* Testing MSVC's output::
2021
2022    $ cl -c -Z7 foo.cpp # Use /Z7 to keep types in the object file
2023    $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj
2024
2025* Getting LLVM IR debug info out of Clang::
2026
2027    $ clang -g -gcodeview --target=x86_64-windows-msvc foo.cpp -S -emit-llvm
2028
2029  Use this to generate LLVM IR for LLVM test cases.
2030
2031* Generate and dump CodeView from LLVM IR metadata::
2032
2033    $ llc foo.ll -filetype=obj -o foo.obj
2034    $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj > foo.txt
2035
2036  Use this pattern in lit test cases and FileCheck the output of llvm-readobj
2037
2038Improving LLVM's CodeView support is a process of finding interesting type
2039records, constructing a C++ test case that makes MSVC emit those records,
2040dumping the records, understanding them, and then generating equivalent records
2041in LLVM's backend.
2042