1================================ 2Source Level Debugging with LLVM 3================================ 4 5.. contents:: 6 :local: 7 8Introduction 9============ 10 11This document is the central repository for all information pertaining to debug 12information in LLVM. It describes the :ref:`actual format that the LLVM debug 13information takes <format>`, which is useful for those interested in creating 14front-ends or dealing directly with the information. Further, this document 15provides specific examples of what debug information for C/C++ looks like. 16 17Philosophy behind LLVM debugging information 18-------------------------------------------- 19 20The idea of the LLVM debugging information is to capture how the important 21pieces of the source-language's Abstract Syntax Tree map onto LLVM code. 22Several design aspects have shaped the solution that appears here. The 23important ones are: 24 25* Debugging information should have very little impact on the rest of the 26 compiler. No transformations, analyses, or code generators should need to 27 be modified because of debugging information. 28 29* LLVM optimizations should interact in :ref:`well-defined and easily described 30 ways <intro_debugopt>` with the debugging information. 31 32* Because LLVM is designed to support arbitrary programming languages, 33 LLVM-to-LLVM tools should not need to know anything about the semantics of 34 the source-level-language. 35 36* Source-level languages are often **widely** different from one another. 37 LLVM should not put any restrictions of the flavor of the source-language, 38 and the debugging information should work with any language. 39 40* With code generator support, it should be possible to use an LLVM compiler 41 to compile a program to native machine code and standard debugging 42 formats. This allows compatibility with traditional machine-code level 43 debuggers, like GDB or DBX. 44 45The approach used by the LLVM implementation is to use a small set of 46:ref:`intrinsic functions <format_common_intrinsics>` to define a mapping 47between LLVM program objects and the source-level objects. The description of 48the source-level program is maintained in LLVM metadata in an 49:ref:`implementation-defined format <ccxx_frontend>` (the C/C++ front-end 50currently uses working draft 7 of the `DWARF 3 standard 51<http://www.eagercon.com/dwarf/dwarf3std.htm>`_). 52 53When a program is being debugged, a debugger interacts with the user and turns 54the stored debug information into source-language specific information. As 55such, a debugger must be aware of the source-language, and is thus tied to a 56specific language or family of languages. 57 58Debug information consumers 59--------------------------- 60 61The role of debug information is to provide meta information normally stripped 62away during the compilation process. This meta information provides an LLVM 63user a relationship between generated code and the original program source 64code. 65 66Currently, there are two backend consumers of debug info: DwarfDebug and 67CodeViewDebug. DwarfDebug produces DWARF suitable for use with GDB, LLDB, and 68other DWARF-based debuggers. :ref:`CodeViewDebug <codeview>` produces CodeView, 69the Microsoft debug info format, which is usable with Microsoft debuggers such 70as Visual Studio and WinDBG. LLVM's debug information format is mostly derived 71from and inspired by DWARF, but it is feasible to translate into other target 72debug info formats such as STABS. 73 74It would also be reasonable to use debug information to feed profiling tools 75for analysis of generated code, or, tools for reconstructing the original 76source from generated code. 77 78.. _intro_debugopt: 79 80Debug information and optimizations 81----------------------------------- 82 83An extremely high priority of LLVM debugging information is to make it interact 84well with optimizations and analysis. In particular, the LLVM debug 85information provides the following guarantees: 86 87* LLVM debug information **always provides information to accurately read 88 the source-level state of the program**, regardless of which LLVM 89 optimizations have been run, and without any modification to the 90 optimizations themselves. However, some optimizations may impact the 91 ability to modify the current state of the program with a debugger, such 92 as setting program variables, or calling functions that have been 93 deleted. 94 95* As desired, LLVM optimizations can be upgraded to be aware of debugging 96 information, allowing them to update the debugging information as they 97 perform aggressive optimizations. This means that, with effort, the LLVM 98 optimizers could optimize debug code just as well as non-debug code. 99 100* LLVM debug information does not prevent optimizations from 101 happening (for example inlining, basic block reordering/merging/cleanup, 102 tail duplication, etc). 103 104* LLVM debug information is automatically optimized along with the rest of 105 the program, using existing facilities. For example, duplicate 106 information is automatically merged by the linker, and unused information 107 is automatically removed. 108 109Basically, the debug information allows you to compile a program with 110"``-O0 -g``" and get full debug information, allowing you to arbitrarily modify 111the program as it executes from a debugger. Compiling a program with 112"``-O3 -g``" gives you full debug information that is always available and 113accurate for reading (e.g., you get accurate stack traces despite tail call 114elimination and inlining), but you might lose the ability to modify the program 115and call functions which were optimized out of the program, or inlined away 116completely. 117 118The :doc:`LLVM test-suite <TestSuiteMakefileGuide>` provides a framework to 119test the optimizer's handling of debugging information. It can be run like 120this: 121 122.. code-block:: bash 123 124 % cd llvm/projects/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks # or some other level 125 % make TEST=dbgopt 126 127This will test impact of debugging information on optimization passes. If 128debugging information influences optimization passes then it will be reported 129as a failure. See :doc:`TestingGuide` for more information on LLVM test 130infrastructure and how to run various tests. 131 132.. _format: 133 134Debugging information format 135============================ 136 137LLVM debugging information has been carefully designed to make it possible for 138the optimizer to optimize the program and debugging information without 139necessarily having to know anything about debugging information. In 140particular, the use of metadata avoids duplicated debugging information from 141the beginning, and the global dead code elimination pass automatically deletes 142debugging information for a function if it decides to delete the function. 143 144To do this, most of the debugging information (descriptors for types, 145variables, functions, source files, etc) is inserted by the language front-end 146in the form of LLVM metadata. 147 148Debug information is designed to be agnostic about the target debugger and 149debugging information representation (e.g. DWARF/Stabs/etc). It uses a generic 150pass to decode the information that represents variables, types, functions, 151namespaces, etc: this allows for arbitrary source-language semantics and 152type-systems to be used, as long as there is a module written for the target 153debugger to interpret the information. 154 155To provide basic functionality, the LLVM debugger does have to make some 156assumptions about the source-level language being debugged, though it keeps 157these to a minimum. The only common features that the LLVM debugger assumes 158exist are `source files <LangRef.html#difile>`_, and `program objects 159<LangRef.html#diglobalvariable>`_. These abstract objects are used by a 160debugger to form stack traces, show information about local variables, etc. 161 162This section of the documentation first describes the representation aspects 163common to any source-language. :ref:`ccxx_frontend` describes the data layout 164conventions used by the C and C++ front-ends. 165 166Debug information descriptors are `specialized metadata nodes 167<LangRef.html#specialized-metadata>`_, first-class subclasses of ``Metadata``. 168 169.. _format_common_intrinsics: 170 171Debugger intrinsic functions 172---------------------------- 173 174LLVM uses several intrinsic functions (name prefixed with "``llvm.dbg``") to 175track source local variables through optimization and code generation. 176 177``llvm.dbg.addr`` 178^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179 180.. code-block:: llvm 181 182 void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata, metadata, metadata) 183 184This intrinsic provides information about a local element (e.g., variable). 185The first argument is metadata holding the address of variable, typically a 186static alloca in the function entry block. The second argument is a 187`local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a description of 188the variable. The third argument is a `complex expression 189<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_. An `llvm.dbg.addr` intrinsic describes the 190*address* of a source variable. 191 192.. code-block:: text 193 194 %i.addr = alloca i32, align 4 195 call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata i32* %i.addr, metadata !1, 196 metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !2 197 !1 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i 198 !2 = !DILocation(...) 199 ... 200 %buffer = alloca [256 x i8], align 8 201 ; The address of i is buffer+64. 202 call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata [256 x i8]* %buffer, metadata !3, 203 metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus, 64)), !dbg !4 204 !3 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i 205 !4 = !DILocation(...) 206 207A frontend should generate exactly one call to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` at the point 208of declaration of a source variable. Optimization passes that fully promote the 209variable from memory to SSA values will replace this call with possibly 210multiple calls to `llvm.dbg.value`. Passes that delete stores are effectively 211partial promotion, and they will insert a mix of calls to ``llvm.dbg.value`` 212and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` to track the source variable value when it is available. 213After optimization, there may be multiple calls to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` describing 214the program points where the variables lives in memory. All calls for the same 215concrete source variable must agree on the memory location. 216 217 218``llvm.dbg.declare`` 219^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 220 221.. code-block:: llvm 222 223 void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) 224 225This intrinsic is identical to `llvm.dbg.addr`, except that there can only be 226one call to `llvm.dbg.declare` for a given concrete `local variable 227<LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_. It is not control-dependent, meaning that if 228a call to `llvm.dbg.declare` exists and has a valid location argument, that 229address is considered to be the true home of the variable across its entire 230lifetime. This makes it hard for optimizations to preserve accurate debug info 231in the presence of ``llvm.dbg.declare``, so we are transitioning away from it, 232and we plan to deprecate it in future LLVM releases. 233 234 235``llvm.dbg.value`` 236^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 237 238.. code-block:: llvm 239 240 void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, metadata, metadata) 241 242This intrinsic provides information when a user source variable is set to a new 243value. The first argument is the new value (wrapped as metadata). The second 244argument is a `local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a 245description of the variable. The third argument is a `complex expression 246<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_. 247 248An `llvm.dbg.value` intrinsic describes the *value* of a source variable 249directly, not its address. Note that the value operand of this intrinsic may 250be indirect (i.e, a pointer to the source variable), provided that interpreting 251the complex expression derives the direct value. 252 253Object lifetimes and scoping 254============================ 255 256In many languages, the local variables in functions can have their lifetimes or 257scopes limited to a subset of a function. In the C family of languages, for 258example, variables are only live (readable and writable) within the source 259block that they are defined in. In functional languages, values are only 260readable after they have been defined. Though this is a very obvious concept, 261it is non-trivial to model in LLVM, because it has no notion of scoping in this 262sense, and does not want to be tied to a language's scoping rules. 263 264In order to handle this, the LLVM debug format uses the metadata attached to 265llvm instructions to encode line number and scoping information. Consider the 266following C fragment, for example: 267 268.. code-block:: c 269 270 1. void foo() { 271 2. int X = 21; 272 3. int Y = 22; 273 4. { 274 5. int Z = 23; 275 6. Z = X; 276 7. } 277 8. X = Y; 278 9. } 279 280.. FIXME: Update the following example to use llvm.dbg.addr once that is the 281 default in clang. 282 283Compiled to LLVM, this function would be represented like this: 284 285.. code-block:: text 286 287 ; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable 288 define void @foo() #0 !dbg !4 { 289 entry: 290 %X = alloca i32, align 4 291 %Y = alloca i32, align 4 292 %Z = alloca i32, align 4 293 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !13), !dbg !14 294 store i32 21, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !14 295 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Y, metadata !15, metadata !13), !dbg !16 296 store i32 22, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !16 297 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !17, metadata !13), !dbg !19 298 store i32 23, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !19 299 %0 = load i32, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !20 300 store i32 %0, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !21 301 %1 = load i32, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !22 302 store i32 %1, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !23 303 ret void, !dbg !24 304 } 305 306 ; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone 307 declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) #1 308 309 attributes #0 = { nounwind ssp uwtable "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "no-frame-pointer-elim"="true" "no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" } 310 attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone } 311 312 !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0} 313 !llvm.module.flags = !{!7, !8, !9} 314 !llvm.ident = !{!10} 315 316 !0 = !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)", isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !2, subprograms: !3, globals: !2, imports: !2) 317 !1 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin", directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info") 318 !2 = !{} 319 !3 = !{!4} 320 !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, isOptimized: false, variables: !2) 321 !5 = !DISubroutineType(types: !6) 322 !6 = !{null} 323 !7 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 2} 324 !8 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} 325 !9 = !{i32 1, !"PIC Level", i32 2} 326 !10 = !{!"clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)"} 327 !11 = !DILocalVariable(name: "X", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 2, type: !12) 328 !12 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, align: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed) 329 !13 = !DIExpression() 330 !14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4) 331 !15 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Y", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 3, type: !12) 332 !16 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 9, scope: !4) 333 !17 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Z", scope: !18, file: !1, line: 5, type: !12) 334 !18 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5) 335 !19 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !18) 336 !20 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 11, scope: !18) 337 !21 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 9, scope: !18) 338 !22 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 9, scope: !4) 339 !23 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 7, scope: !4) 340 !24 = !DILocation(line: 9, column: 3, scope: !4) 341 342 343This example illustrates a few important details about LLVM debugging 344information. In particular, it shows how the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic and 345location information, which are attached to an instruction, are applied 346together to allow a debugger to analyze the relationship between statements, 347variable definitions, and the code used to implement the function. 348 349.. code-block:: llvm 350 351 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !13), !dbg !14 352 ; [debug line = 2:7] [debug variable = X] 353 354The first intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for the 355variable ``X``. The metadata ``!dbg !14`` attached to the intrinsic provides 356scope information for the variable ``X``. 357 358.. code-block:: text 359 360 !14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4) 361 !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, 362 isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, 363 isOptimized: false, variables: !2) 364 365Here ``!14`` is metadata providing `location information 366<LangRef.html#dilocation>`_. In this example, scope is encoded by ``!4``, a 367`subprogram descriptor <LangRef.html#disubprogram>`_. This way the location 368information attached to the intrinsics indicates that the variable ``X`` is 369declared at line number 2 at a function level scope in function ``foo``. 370 371Now lets take another example. 372 373.. code-block:: llvm 374 375 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !17, metadata !13), !dbg !19 376 ; [debug line = 5:9] [debug variable = Z] 377 378The third intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for 379variable ``Z``. The metadata ``!dbg !19`` attached to the intrinsic provides 380scope information for the variable ``Z``. 381 382.. code-block:: text 383 384 !18 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5) 385 !19 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !18) 386 387Here ``!19`` indicates that ``Z`` is declared at line number 5 and column 388number 11 inside of lexical scope ``!18``. The lexical scope itself resides 389inside of subprogram ``!4`` described above. 390 391The scope information attached with each instruction provides a straightforward 392way to find instructions covered by a scope. 393 394Object lifetime in optimized code 395================================= 396 397In the example above, every variable assignment uniquely corresponds to a 398memory store to the variable's position on the stack. However in heavily 399optimized code LLVM promotes most variables into SSA values, which can 400eventually be placed in physical registers or memory locations. To track SSA 401values through compilation, when objects are promoted to SSA values an 402``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic is created for each assignment, recording the 403variable's new location. Compared with the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic: 404 405* A dbg.value terminates the effect of any preceeding dbg.values for (any 406 overlapping fragments of) the specified variable. 407* The dbg.value's position in the IR defines where in the instruction stream 408 the variable's value changes. 409* Operands can be constants, indicating the variable is assigned a 410 constant value. 411 412Care must be taken to update ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics when optimization 413passes alter or move instructions and blocks -- the developer could observe such 414changes reflected in the value of variables when debugging the program. For any 415execution of the optimized program, the set of variable values presented to the 416developer by the debugger should not show a state that would never have existed 417in the execution of the unoptimized program, given the same input. Doing so 418risks misleading the developer by reporting a state that does not exist, 419damaging their understanding of the optimized program and undermining their 420trust in the debugger. 421 422Sometimes perfectly preserving variable locations is not possible, often when a 423redundant calculation is optimized out. In such cases, a ``llvm.dbg.value`` 424with operand ``undef`` should be used, to terminate earlier variable locations 425and let the debugger present ``optimized out`` to the developer. Withholding 426these potentially stale variable values from the developer diminishes the 427amount of available debug information, but increases the reliability of the 428remaining information. 429 430To illustrate some potential issues, consider the following example: 431 432.. code-block:: llvm 433 434 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 435 entry: 436 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2) 437 br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr 438 truebr: 439 %tval = add i32 %bar, 1 440 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %tval, metadata !1, metadata !2) 441 %g1 = call i32 @gazonk() 442 br label %exit 443 falsebr: 444 %fval = add i32 %bar, 2 445 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %fval, metadata !1, metadata !2) 446 %g2 = call i32 @gazonk() 447 br label %exit 448 exit: 449 %merge = phi [ %tval, %truebr ], [ %fval, %falsebr ] 450 %g = phi [ %g1, %truebr ], [ %g2, %falsebr ] 451 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %merge, metadata !1, metadata !2) 452 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2) 453 %plusten = add i32 %merge, 10 454 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 455 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2) 456 ret i32 %toret 457 } 458 459Containing two source-level variables in ``!1`` and ``!3``. The function could, 460perhaps, be optimized into the following code: 461 462.. code-block:: llvm 463 464 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 465 entry: 466 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 467 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 468 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 469 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 470 ret i32 %toret 471 } 472 473What ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics should be placed to represent the original variable 474locations in this code? Unfortunately the the second, third and fourth 475dbg.values for ``!1`` in the source function have had their operands 476(%tval, %fval, %merge) optimized out. Assuming we cannot recover them, we 477might consider this placement of dbg.values: 478 479.. code-block:: llvm 480 481 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 482 entry: 483 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2) 484 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 485 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2) 486 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 487 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 488 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 489 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2) 490 ret i32 %toret 491 } 492 493However, this will cause ``!3`` to have the return value of ``@gazonk()`` at 494the same time as ``!1`` has the constant value zero -- a pair of assignments 495that never occurred in the unoptimized program. To avoid this, we must terminate 496the range that ``!1`` has the constant value assignment by inserting an undef 497dbg.value before the dbg.value for ``!3``: 498 499.. code-block:: llvm 500 501 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 502 entry: 503 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2) 504 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 505 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 undef, metadata !1, metadata !2) 506 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2) 507 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 508 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 509 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 510 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2) 511 ret i32 %toret 512 } 513 514In general, if any dbg.value has its operand optimized out and cannot be 515recovered, then an undef dbg.value is necessary to terminate earlier variable 516locations. Additional undef dbg.values may be necessary when the debugger can 517observe re-ordering of assignments. 518 519How variable location metadata is transformed during CodeGen 520============================================================ 521 522LLVM preserves debug information throughout mid-level and backend passes, 523ultimately producing a mapping between source-level information and 524instruction ranges. This 525is relatively straightforwards for line number information, as mapping 526instructions to line numbers is a simple association. For variable locations 527however the story is more complex. As each ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic 528represents a source-level assignment of a value to a source variable, the 529variable location intrinsics effectively embed a small imperative program 530within the LLVM IR. By the end of CodeGen, this becomes a mapping from each 531variable to their machine locations over ranges of instructions. 532From IR to object emission, the major transformations which affect variable 533location fidelity are: 5341. Instruction Selection 5352. Register allocation 5363. Block layout 537 538each of which are discussed below. In addition, instruction scheduling can 539significantly change the ordering of the program, and occurs in a number of 540different passes. 541 542Variable locations in Instruction Selection and MIR 543--------------------------------------------------- 544 545Instruction selection creates a MIR function from an IR function, and just as 546it transforms ``intermediate`` instructions into machine instructions, so must 547``intermediate`` variable locations become machine variable locations. 548Within IR, variable locations are always identified by a Value, but in MIR 549there can be different types of variable locations. In addition, some IR 550locations become unavailable, for example if the operation of multiple IR 551instructions are combined into one machine instruction (such as 552multiply-and-accumulate) then intermediate Values are lost. To track variable 553locations through instruction selection, they are first separated into 554locations that do not depend on code generation (constants, stack locations, 555allocated virtual registers) and those that do. For those that do, debug 556metadata is attached to SDNodes in SelectionDAGs. After instruction selection 557has occurred and a MIR function is created, if the SDNode associated with debug 558metadata is allocated a virtual register, that virtual register is used as the 559variable location. If the SDNode is folded into a machine instruction or 560otherwise transformed into a non-register, the variable location becomes 561unavailable. 562 563Locations that are unavailable are treated as if they have been optimized out: 564in IR the location would be assigned ``undef`` by a debug intrinsic, and in MIR 565the equivalent location is used. 566 567After MIR locations are assigned to each variable, machine pseudo-instructions 568corresponding to each ``llvm.dbg.value`` and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` intrinsic are 569inserted. These ``DBG_VALUE`` instructions appear thus: 570 571.. code-block:: text 572 573 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !123, !DIExpression() 574 575And have the following operands: 576 * The first operand can record the variable location as a register, an 577 immediate, or the base address register if the original debug intrinsic 578 referred to memory. ``$noreg`` indicates the variable location is undefined, 579 equivalent to an ``undef`` dbg.value operand. 580 * The type of the second operand indicates whether the variable location is 581 directly referred to by the DBG_VALUE, or whether it is indirect. The 582 ``$noreg`` register signifies the former, an immediate operand (0) the 583 latter. 584 * Operand 3 is the Variable field of the original debug intrinsic. 585 * Operand 4 is the Expression field of the original debug intrinsic. 586 587The position at which the DBG_VALUEs are inserted should correspond to the 588positions of their matching ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics in the IR block. As 589with optimization, LLVM aims to preserve the order in which variable 590assignments occurred in the source program. However SelectionDAG performs some 591instruction scheduling, which can reorder assignments (discussed below). 592Function parameter locations are moved to the beginning of the function if 593they're not already, to ensure they're immediately available on function entry. 594 595To demonstrate variable locations during instruction selection, consider 596the following example: 597 598.. code-block:: llvm 599 600 define i32 @foo(i32* %addr) { 601 entry: 602 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 603 br label %bb1, !dbg !5 604 605 bb1: ; preds = %bb1, %entry 606 %bar.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %add, %bb1 ] 607 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %bar.0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 608 %addr1 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 1, !dbg !5 609 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr1, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 610 %loaded1 = load i32, i32* %addr1, !dbg !5 611 %addr2 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 %bar.0, !dbg !5 612 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr2, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 613 %loaded2 = load i32, i32* %addr2, !dbg !5 614 %add = add i32 %bar.0, 1, !dbg !5 615 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %add, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 616 %added = add i32 %loaded1, %loaded2 617 %cond = icmp ult i32 %added, %bar.0, !dbg !5 618 br i1 %cond, label %bb1, label %bb2, !dbg !5 619 620 bb2: ; preds = %bb1 621 ret i32 0, !dbg !5 622 } 623 624If one compiles this IR with ``llc -o - -start-after=codegen-prepare -stop-after=expand-isel-pseudos -mtriple=x86_64--``, the following MIR is produced: 625 626.. code-block:: text 627 628 bb.0.entry: 629 successors: %bb.1(0x80000000) 630 liveins: $rdi 631 632 %2:gr64 = COPY $rdi 633 %3:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags 634 DBG_VALUE 0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 635 636 bb.1.bb1: 637 successors: %bb.1(0x7c000000), %bb.2(0x04000000) 638 639 %0:gr32 = PHI %3, %bb.0, %1, %bb.1 640 DBG_VALUE %0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 641 DBG_VALUE %2, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4, DW_OP_stack_value), debug-location !5 642 %4:gr32 = MOV32rm %2, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 643 %5:gr64_nosp = MOVSX64rr32 %0, debug-location !5 644 DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 645 %1:gr32 = INC32r %0, implicit-def dead $eflags, debug-location !5 646 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 647 %6:gr32 = ADD32rm %4, %2, 4, killed %5, 0, $noreg, implicit-def dead $eflags :: (load 4 from %ir.addr2) 648 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %0, implicit-def $eflags, debug-location !5 649 JB_1 %bb.1, implicit $eflags, debug-location !5 650 JMP_1 %bb.2, debug-location !5 651 652 bb.2.bb2: 653 %8:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags 654 $eax = COPY %8, debug-location !5 655 RET 0, $eax, debug-location !5 656 657Observe first that there is a DBG_VALUE instruction for every ``llvm.dbg.value`` 658intrinsic in the source IR, ensuring no source level assignments go missing. 659Then consider the different ways in which variable locations have been recorded: 660 661* For the first dbg.value an immediate operand is used to record a zero value. 662* The dbg.value of the PHI instruction leads to a DBG_VALUE of virtual register 663 ``%0``. 664* The first GEP has its effect folded into the first load instruction 665 (as a 4-byte offset), but the variable location is salvaged by folding 666 the GEPs effect into the DIExpression. 667* The second GEP is also folded into the corresponding load. However, it is 668 insufficiently simple to be salvaged, and is emitted as a ``$noreg`` 669 DBG_VALUE, indicating that the variable takes on an undefined location. 670* The final dbg.value has its Value placed in virtual register ``%1``. 671 672Instruction Scheduling 673---------------------- 674 675A number of passes can reschedule instructions, notably instruction selection 676and the pre-and-post RA machine schedulers. Instruction scheduling can 677significantly change the nature of the program -- in the (very unlikely) worst 678case the instruction sequence could be completely reversed. In such 679circumstances LLVM follows the principle applied to optimizations, that it is 680better for the debugger not to display any state than a misleading state. 681Thus, whenever instructions are advanced in order of execution, any 682corresponding DBG_VALUE is kept in its original position, and if an instruction 683is delayed then the variable is given an undefined location for the duration 684of the delay. To illustrate, consider this pseudo-MIR: 685 686.. code-block:: text 687 688 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 689 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 690 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 691 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 692 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 693 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 694 695Imagine that the SUB32rr were moved forward to give us the following MIR: 696 697.. code-block:: text 698 699 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 700 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 701 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 702 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 703 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 704 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 705 706In this circumstance LLVM would leave the MIR as shown above. Were we to move 707the DBG_VALUE of virtual register %7 upwards with the SUB32rr, we would re-order 708assignments and introduce a new state of the program. Wheras with the solution 709above, the debugger will see one fewer combination of variable values, because 710``!3`` and ``!5`` will change value at the same time. This is preferred over 711misrepresenting the original program. 712 713In comparison, if one sunk the MOV32rm, LLVM would produce the following: 714 715.. code-block:: text 716 717 DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !1, !2 718 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 719 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 720 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 721 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 722 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 723 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 724 725Here, to avoid presenting a state in which the first assignment to ``!1`` 726disappears, the DBG_VALUE at the top of the block assigns the variable the 727undefined location, until its value is available at the end of the block where 728an additional DBG_VALUE is added. Were any other DBG_VALUE for ``!1`` to occur 729in the instructions that the MOV32rm was sunk past, the DBG_VALUE for ``%1`` 730would be dropped and the debugger would never observe it in the variable. This 731accurately reflects that the value is not available during the corresponding 732portion of the original program. 733 734Variable locations during Register Allocation 735--------------------------------------------- 736 737To avoid debug instructions interfering with the register allocator, the 738LiveDebugVariables pass extracts variable locations from a MIR function and 739deletes the corresponding DBG_VALUE instructions. Some localized copy 740propagation is performed within blocks. After register allocation, the 741VirtRegRewriter pass re-inserts DBG_VALUE instructions in their orignal 742positions, translating virtual register references into their physical 743machine locations. To avoid encoding incorrect variable locations, in this 744pass any DBG_VALUE of a virtual register that is not live, is replaced by 745the undefined location. 746 747LiveDebugValues expansion of variable locations 748----------------------------------------------- 749 750After all optimizations have run and shortly before emission, the 751LiveDebugValues pass runs to achieve two aims: 752 753* To propagate the location of variables through copies and register spills, 754* For every block, to record every valid variable location in that block. 755 756After this pass the DBG_VALUE instruction changes meaning: rather than 757corresponding to a source-level assignment where the variable may change value, 758it asserts the location of a variable in a block, and loses effect outside the 759block. Propagating variable locations through copies and spills is 760straightforwards: determining the variable location in every basic block 761requries the consideraton of control flow. Consider the following IR, which 762presents several difficulties: 763 764.. code-block:: text 765 766 define dso_local i32 @foo(i1 %cond, i32 %input) !dbg !12 { 767 entry: 768 br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr 769 770 bb1: 771 %value = phi i32 [ %value1, %truebr ], [ %value2, %falsebr ] 772 br label %exit, !dbg !26 773 774 truebr: 775 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 776 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 1, metadata !23, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 777 %value1 = add i32 %input, 1 778 br label %bb1 779 780 falsebr: 781 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 782 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 2, metadata !23, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 783 %value = add i32 %input, 2 784 br label %bb1 785 786 exit: 787 ret i32 %value, !dbg !30 788 } 789 790Here the difficulties are: 791 792* The control flow is roughly the opposite of basic block order 793* The value of the ``!23`` variable merges into ``%bb1``, but there is no PHI 794 node 795 796As mentioned above, the ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics essentially form an 797imperative program embedded in the IR, with each intrinsic defining a variable 798location. This *could* be converted to an SSA form by mem2reg, in the same way 799that it uses use-def chains to identify control flow merges and insert phi 800nodes for IR Values. However, because debug variable locations are defined for 801every machine instruction, in effect every IR instruction uses every variable 802location, which would lead to a large number of debugging intrinsics being 803generated. 804 805Examining the example above, variable ``!30`` is assigned ``%input`` on both 806conditional paths through the function, while ``!23`` is assigned differing 807constant values on either path. Where control flow merges in ``%bb1`` we would 808want ``!30`` to keep its location (``%input``), but ``!23`` to become undefined 809as we cannot determine at runtime what value it should have in %bb1 without 810inserting a PHI node. mem2reg does not insert the PHI node to avoid changing 811codegen when debugging is enabled, and does not insert the other dbg.values 812to avoid adding very large numbers of intrinsics. 813 814Instead, LiveDebugValues determines variable locations when control 815flow merges. A dataflow analysis is used to propagate locations between blocks: 816when control flow merges, if a variable has the same location in all 817predecessors then that location is propagated into the successor. If the 818predecessor locations disagree, the location becomes undefined. 819 820Once LiveDebugValues has run, every block should have all valid variable 821locations described by DBG_VALUE instructions within the block. Very little 822effort is then required by supporting classes (such as 823DbgEntityHistoryCalculator) to build a map of each instruction to every 824valid variable location, without the need to consider control flow. From 825the example above, it is otherwise difficult to determine that the location 826of variable ``!30`` should flow "up" into block ``%bb1``, but that the location 827of variable ``!23`` should not flow "down" into the ``%exit`` block. 828 829.. _ccxx_frontend: 830 831C/C++ front-end specific debug information 832========================================== 833 834The C and C++ front-ends represent information about the program in a format 835that is effectively identical to `DWARF 3.0 836<http://www.eagercon.com/dwarf/dwarf3std.htm>`_ in terms of information 837content. This allows code generators to trivially support native debuggers by 838generating standard dwarf information, and contains enough information for 839non-dwarf targets to translate it as needed. 840 841This section describes the forms used to represent C and C++ programs. Other 842languages could pattern themselves after this (which itself is tuned to 843representing programs in the same way that DWARF 3 does), or they could choose 844to provide completely different forms if they don't fit into the DWARF model. 845As support for debugging information gets added to the various LLVM 846source-language front-ends, the information used should be documented here. 847 848The following sections provide examples of a few C/C++ constructs and the debug 849information that would best describe those constructs. The canonical 850references are the ``DIDescriptor`` classes defined in 851``include/llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h`` and the implementations of the helper functions 852in ``lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp``. 853 854C/C++ source file information 855----------------------------- 856 857``llvm::Instruction`` provides easy access to metadata attached with an 858instruction. One can extract line number information encoded in LLVM IR using 859``Instruction::getDebugLoc()`` and ``DILocation::getLine()``. 860 861.. code-block:: c++ 862 863 if (DILocation *Loc = I->getDebugLoc()) { // Here I is an LLVM instruction 864 unsigned Line = Loc->getLine(); 865 StringRef File = Loc->getFilename(); 866 StringRef Dir = Loc->getDirectory(); 867 bool ImplicitCode = Loc->isImplicitCode(); 868 } 869 870When the flag ImplicitCode is true then it means that the Instruction has been 871added by the front-end but doesn't correspond to source code written by the user. For example 872 873.. code-block:: c++ 874 875 if (MyBoolean) { 876 MyObject MO; 877 ... 878 } 879 880At the end of the scope the MyObject's destructor is called but it isn't written 881explicitly. This information is useful to avoid to have counters on brackets when 882making code coverage. 883 884C/C++ global variable information 885--------------------------------- 886 887Given an integer global variable declared as follows: 888 889.. code-block:: c 890 891 _Alignas(8) int MyGlobal = 100; 892 893a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors: 894 895.. code-block:: text 896 897 ;; 898 ;; Define the global itself. 899 ;; 900 @MyGlobal = global i32 100, align 8, !dbg !0 901 902 ;; 903 ;; List of debug info of globals 904 ;; 905 !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1} 906 907 ;; Some unrelated metadata. 908 !llvm.module.flags = !{!6, !7} 909 !llvm.ident = !{!8} 910 911 ;; Define the global variable itself 912 !0 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(name: "MyGlobal", scope: !1, file: !2, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, align: 64) 913 914 ;; Define the compile unit. 915 !1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2, 916 producer: "clang version 4.0.0", 917 isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, 918 enums: !3, globals: !4) 919 920 ;; 921 ;; Define the file 922 ;; 923 !2 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin", 924 directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info") 925 926 ;; An empty array. 927 !3 = !{} 928 929 ;; The Array of Global Variables 930 !4 = !{!0} 931 932 ;; 933 ;; Define the type 934 ;; 935 !5 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed) 936 937 ;; Dwarf version to output. 938 !6 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 4} 939 940 ;; Debug info schema version. 941 !7 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} 942 943 ;; Compiler identification 944 !8 = !{!"clang version 4.0.0"} 945 946 947The align value in DIGlobalVariable description specifies variable alignment in 948case it was forced by C11 _Alignas(), C++11 alignas() keywords or compiler 949attribute __attribute__((aligned ())). In other case (when this field is missing) 950alignment is considered default. This is used when producing DWARF output 951for DW_AT_alignment value. 952 953C/C++ function information 954-------------------------- 955 956Given a function declared as follows: 957 958.. code-block:: c 959 960 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { 961 return 0; 962 } 963 964a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors: 965 966.. code-block:: text 967 968 ;; 969 ;; Define the anchor for subprograms. 970 ;; 971 !4 = !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, 972 isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, 973 flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, 974 variables: !2) 975 976 ;; 977 ;; Define the subprogram itself. 978 ;; 979 define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** %argv) !dbg !4 { 980 ... 981 } 982 983Fortran specific debug information 984================================== 985 986Fortran function information 987---------------------------- 988 989There are a few DWARF attributes defined to support client debugging of Fortran programs. LLVM can generate (or omit) the appropriate DWARF attributes for the prefix-specs of ELEMENTAL, PURE, IMPURE, RECURSIVE, and NON_RECURSIVE. This is done by using the spFlags values: DISPFlagElemental, DISPFlagPure, and DISPFlagRecursive. 990 991.. code-block:: fortran 992 993 elemental function elem_func(a) 994 995a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors: 996 997.. code-block:: text 998 999 !11 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "subroutine2", scope: !1, file: !1, 1000 line: 5, type: !8, scopeLine: 6, 1001 spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition | DISPFlagElemental, unit: !0, 1002 retainedNodes: !2) 1003 1004and this will materialize an additional DWARF attribute as: 1005 1006.. code-block:: text 1007 1008 DW_TAG_subprogram [3] 1009 DW_AT_low_pc [DW_FORM_addr] (0x0000000000000010 ".text") 1010 DW_AT_high_pc [DW_FORM_data4] (0x00000001) 1011 ... 1012 DW_AT_elemental [DW_FORM_flag_present] (true) 1013 1014Debugging information format 1015============================ 1016 1017Debugging Information Extension for Objective C Properties 1018---------------------------------------------------------- 1019 1020Introduction 1021^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1022 1023Objective C provides a simpler way to declare and define accessor methods using 1024declared properties. The language provides features to declare a property and 1025to let compiler synthesize accessor methods. 1026 1027The debugger lets developer inspect Objective C interfaces and their instance 1028variables and class variables. However, the debugger does not know anything 1029about the properties defined in Objective C interfaces. The debugger consumes 1030information generated by compiler in DWARF format. The format does not support 1031encoding of Objective C properties. This proposal describes DWARF extensions to 1032encode Objective C properties, which the debugger can use to let developers 1033inspect Objective C properties. 1034 1035Proposal 1036^^^^^^^^ 1037 1038Objective C properties exist separately from class members. A property can be 1039defined only by "setter" and "getter" selectors, and be calculated anew on each 1040access. Or a property can just be a direct access to some declared ivar. 1041Finally it can have an ivar "automatically synthesized" for it by the compiler, 1042in which case the property can be referred to in user code directly using the 1043standard C dereference syntax as well as through the property "dot" syntax, but 1044there is no entry in the ``@interface`` declaration corresponding to this ivar. 1045 1046To facilitate debugging, these properties we will add a new DWARF TAG into the 1047``DW_TAG_structure_type`` definition for the class to hold the description of a 1048given property, and a set of DWARF attributes that provide said description. 1049The property tag will also contain the name and declared type of the property. 1050 1051If there is a related ivar, there will also be a DWARF property attribute placed 1052in the ``DW_TAG_member`` DIE for that ivar referring back to the property TAG 1053for that property. And in the case where the compiler synthesizes the ivar 1054directly, the compiler is expected to generate a ``DW_TAG_member`` for that 1055ivar (with the ``DW_AT_artificial`` set to 1), whose name will be the name used 1056to access this ivar directly in code, and with the property attribute pointing 1057back to the property it is backing. 1058 1059The following examples will serve as illustration for our discussion: 1060 1061.. code-block:: objc 1062 1063 @interface I1 { 1064 int n2; 1065 } 1066 1067 @property int p1; 1068 @property int p2; 1069 @end 1070 1071 @implementation I1 1072 @synthesize p1; 1073 @synthesize p2 = n2; 1074 @end 1075 1076This produces the following DWARF (this is a "pseudo dwarfdump" output): 1077 1078.. code-block:: none 1079 1080 0x00000100: TAG_structure_type [7] * 1081 AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 ) 1082 AT_name( "I1" ) 1083 AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" ) 1084 AT_decl_line( 3 ) 1085 1086 0x00000110 TAG_APPLE_property 1087 AT_name ( "p1" ) 1088 AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1089 1090 0x00000120: TAG_APPLE_property 1091 AT_name ( "p2" ) 1092 AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1093 1094 0x00000130: TAG_member [8] 1095 AT_name( "_p1" ) 1096 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000110} "p1" ) 1097 AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1098 AT_artificial ( 0x1 ) 1099 1100 0x00000140: TAG_member [8] 1101 AT_name( "n2" ) 1102 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000120} "p2" ) 1103 AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1104 1105 0x00000150: AT_type( ( int ) ) 1106 1107Note, the current convention is that the name of the ivar for an 1108auto-synthesized property is the name of the property from which it derives 1109with an underscore prepended, as is shown in the example. But we actually 1110don't need to know this convention, since we are given the name of the ivar 1111directly. 1112 1113Also, it is common practice in ObjC to have different property declarations in 1114the @interface and @implementation - e.g. to provide a read-only property in 1115the interface,and a read-write interface in the implementation. In that case, 1116the compiler should emit whichever property declaration will be in force in the 1117current translation unit. 1118 1119Developers can decorate a property with attributes which are encoded using 1120``DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute``. 1121 1122.. code-block:: objc 1123 1124 @property (readonly, nonatomic) int pr; 1125 1126.. code-block:: none 1127 1128 TAG_APPLE_property [8] 1129 AT_name( "pr" ) 1130 AT_type ( {0x00000147} (int) ) 1131 AT_APPLE_property_attribute (DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly, DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic) 1132 1133The setter and getter method names are attached to the property using 1134``DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter`` and ``DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter`` attributes. 1135 1136.. code-block:: objc 1137 1138 @interface I1 1139 @property (setter=myOwnP3Setter:) int p3; 1140 -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a; 1141 @end 1142 1143 @implementation I1 1144 @synthesize p3; 1145 -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a{ } 1146 @end 1147 1148The DWARF for this would be: 1149 1150.. code-block:: none 1151 1152 0x000003bd: TAG_structure_type [7] * 1153 AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 ) 1154 AT_name( "I1" ) 1155 AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" ) 1156 AT_decl_line( 3 ) 1157 1158 0x000003cd TAG_APPLE_property 1159 AT_name ( "p3" ) 1160 AT_APPLE_property_setter ( "myOwnP3Setter:" ) 1161 AT_type( {0x00000147} ( int ) ) 1162 1163 0x000003f3: TAG_member [8] 1164 AT_name( "_p3" ) 1165 AT_type ( {0x00000147} ( int ) ) 1166 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x000003cd} ) 1167 AT_artificial ( 0x1 ) 1168 1169New DWARF Tags 1170^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1171 1172+-----------------------+--------+ 1173| TAG | Value | 1174+=======================+========+ 1175| DW_TAG_APPLE_property | 0x4200 | 1176+-----------------------+--------+ 1177 1178New DWARF Attributes 1179^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1180 1181+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1182| Attribute | Value | Classes | 1183+================================+========+===========+ 1184| DW_AT_APPLE_property | 0x3fed | Reference | 1185+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1186| DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter | 0x3fe9 | String | 1187+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1188| DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter | 0x3fea | String | 1189+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1190| DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute | 0x3feb | Constant | 1191+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1192 1193New DWARF Constants 1194^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1195 1196+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1197| Name | Value | 1198+======================================+=======+ 1199| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly | 0x01 | 1200+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1201| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_getter | 0x02 | 1202+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1203| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_assign | 0x04 | 1204+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1205| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readwrite | 0x08 | 1206+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1207| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_retain | 0x10 | 1208+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1209| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_copy | 0x20 | 1210+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1211| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic | 0x40 | 1212+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1213| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_setter | 0x80 | 1214+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1215| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_atomic | 0x100 | 1216+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1217| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_weak | 0x200 | 1218+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1219| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_strong | 0x400 | 1220+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1221| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_unsafe_unretained | 0x800 | 1222+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1223| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nullability | 0x1000| 1224+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1225| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_null_resettable | 0x2000| 1226+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1227| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_class | 0x4000| 1228+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1229 1230Name Accelerator Tables 1231----------------------- 1232 1233Introduction 1234^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1235 1236The "``.debug_pubnames``" and "``.debug_pubtypes``" formats are not what a 1237debugger needs. The "``pub``" in the section name indicates that the entries 1238in the table are publicly visible names only. This means no static or hidden 1239functions show up in the "``.debug_pubnames``". No static variables or private 1240class variables are in the "``.debug_pubtypes``". Many compilers add different 1241things to these tables, so we can't rely upon the contents between gcc, icc, or 1242clang. 1243 1244The typical query given by users tends not to match up with the contents of 1245these tables. For example, the DWARF spec states that "In the case of the name 1246of a function member or static data member of a C++ structure, class or union, 1247the name presented in the "``.debug_pubnames``" section is not the simple name 1248given by the ``DW_AT_name attribute`` of the referenced debugging information 1249entry, but rather the fully qualified name of the data or function member." 1250So the only names in these tables for complex C++ entries is a fully 1251qualified name. Debugger users tend not to enter their search strings as 1252"``a::b::c(int,const Foo&) const``", but rather as "``c``", "``b::c``" , or 1253"``a::b::c``". So the name entered in the name table must be demangled in 1254order to chop it up appropriately and additional names must be manually entered 1255into the table to make it effective as a name lookup table for debuggers to 1256use. 1257 1258All debuggers currently ignore the "``.debug_pubnames``" table as a result of 1259its inconsistent and useless public-only name content making it a waste of 1260space in the object file. These tables, when they are written to disk, are not 1261sorted in any way, leaving every debugger to do its own parsing and sorting. 1262These tables also include an inlined copy of the string values in the table 1263itself making the tables much larger than they need to be on disk, especially 1264for large C++ programs. 1265 1266Can't we just fix the sections by adding all of the names we need to this 1267table? No, because that is not what the tables are defined to contain and we 1268won't know the difference between the old bad tables and the new good tables. 1269At best we could make our own renamed sections that contain all of the data we 1270need. 1271 1272These tables are also insufficient for what a debugger like LLDB needs. LLDB 1273uses clang for its expression parsing where LLDB acts as a PCH. LLDB is then 1274often asked to look for type "``foo``" or namespace "``bar``", or list items in 1275namespace "``baz``". Namespaces are not included in the pubnames or pubtypes 1276tables. Since clang asks a lot of questions when it is parsing an expression, 1277we need to be very fast when looking up names, as it happens a lot. Having new 1278accelerator tables that are optimized for very quick lookups will benefit this 1279type of debugging experience greatly. 1280 1281We would like to generate name lookup tables that can be mapped into memory 1282from disk, and used as is, with little or no up-front parsing. We would also 1283be able to control the exact content of these different tables so they contain 1284exactly what we need. The Name Accelerator Tables were designed to fix these 1285issues. In order to solve these issues we need to: 1286 1287* Have a format that can be mapped into memory from disk and used as is 1288* Lookups should be very fast 1289* Extensible table format so these tables can be made by many producers 1290* Contain all of the names needed for typical lookups out of the box 1291* Strict rules for the contents of tables 1292 1293Table size is important and the accelerator table format should allow the reuse 1294of strings from common string tables so the strings for the names are not 1295duplicated. We also want to make sure the table is ready to be used as-is by 1296simply mapping the table into memory with minimal header parsing. 1297 1298The name lookups need to be fast and optimized for the kinds of lookups that 1299debuggers tend to do. Optimally we would like to touch as few parts of the 1300mapped table as possible when doing a name lookup and be able to quickly find 1301the name entry we are looking for, or discover there are no matches. In the 1302case of debuggers we optimized for lookups that fail most of the time. 1303 1304Each table that is defined should have strict rules on exactly what is in the 1305accelerator tables and documented so clients can rely on the content. 1306 1307Hash Tables 1308^^^^^^^^^^^ 1309 1310Standard Hash Tables 1311"""""""""""""""""""" 1312 1313Typical hash tables have a header, buckets, and each bucket points to the 1314bucket contents: 1315 1316.. code-block:: none 1317 1318 .------------. 1319 | HEADER | 1320 |------------| 1321 | BUCKETS | 1322 |------------| 1323 | DATA | 1324 `------------' 1325 1326The BUCKETS are an array of offsets to DATA for each hash: 1327 1328.. code-block:: none 1329 1330 .------------. 1331 | 0x00001000 | BUCKETS[0] 1332 | 0x00002000 | BUCKETS[1] 1333 | 0x00002200 | BUCKETS[2] 1334 | 0x000034f0 | BUCKETS[3] 1335 | | ... 1336 | 0xXXXXXXXX | BUCKETS[n_buckets] 1337 '------------' 1338 1339So for ``bucket[3]`` in the example above, we have an offset into the table 13400x000034f0 which points to a chain of entries for the bucket. Each bucket must 1341contain a next pointer, full 32 bit hash value, the string itself, and the data 1342for the current string value. 1343 1344.. code-block:: none 1345 1346 .------------. 1347 0x000034f0: | 0x00003500 | next pointer 1348 | 0x12345678 | 32 bit hash 1349 | "erase" | string value 1350 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1351 |------------| 1352 0x00003500: | 0x00003550 | next pointer 1353 | 0x29273623 | 32 bit hash 1354 | "dump" | string value 1355 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1356 |------------| 1357 0x00003550: | 0x00000000 | next pointer 1358 | 0x82638293 | 32 bit hash 1359 | "main" | string value 1360 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1361 `------------' 1362 1363The problem with this layout for debuggers is that we need to optimize for the 1364negative lookup case where the symbol we're searching for is not present. So 1365if we were to lookup "``printf``" in the table above, we would make a 32-bit 1366hash for "``printf``", it might match ``bucket[3]``. We would need to go to 1367the offset 0x000034f0 and start looking to see if our 32 bit hash matches. To 1368do so, we need to read the next pointer, then read the hash, compare it, and 1369skip to the next bucket. Each time we are skipping many bytes in memory and 1370touching new pages just to do the compare on the full 32 bit hash. All of 1371these accesses then tell us that we didn't have a match. 1372 1373Name Hash Tables 1374"""""""""""""""" 1375 1376To solve the issues mentioned above we have structured the hash tables a bit 1377differently: a header, buckets, an array of all unique 32 bit hash values, 1378followed by an array of hash value data offsets, one for each hash value, then 1379the data for all hash values: 1380 1381.. code-block:: none 1382 1383 .-------------. 1384 | HEADER | 1385 |-------------| 1386 | BUCKETS | 1387 |-------------| 1388 | HASHES | 1389 |-------------| 1390 | OFFSETS | 1391 |-------------| 1392 | DATA | 1393 `-------------' 1394 1395The ``BUCKETS`` in the name tables are an index into the ``HASHES`` array. By 1396making all of the full 32 bit hash values contiguous in memory, we allow 1397ourselves to efficiently check for a match while touching as little memory as 1398possible. Most often checking the 32 bit hash values is as far as the lookup 1399goes. If it does match, it usually is a match with no collisions. So for a 1400table with "``n_buckets``" buckets, and "``n_hashes``" unique 32 bit hash 1401values, we can clarify the contents of the ``BUCKETS``, ``HASHES`` and 1402``OFFSETS`` as: 1403 1404.. code-block:: none 1405 1406 .-------------------------. 1407 | HEADER.magic | uint32_t 1408 | HEADER.version | uint16_t 1409 | HEADER.hash_function | uint16_t 1410 | HEADER.bucket_count | uint32_t 1411 | HEADER.hashes_count | uint32_t 1412 | HEADER.header_data_len | uint32_t 1413 | HEADER_DATA | HeaderData 1414 |-------------------------| 1415 | BUCKETS | uint32_t[n_buckets] // 32 bit hash indexes 1416 |-------------------------| 1417 | HASHES | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit hash values 1418 |-------------------------| 1419 | OFFSETS | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit offsets to hash value data 1420 |-------------------------| 1421 | ALL HASH DATA | 1422 `-------------------------' 1423 1424So taking the exact same data from the standard hash example above we end up 1425with: 1426 1427.. code-block:: none 1428 1429 .------------. 1430 | HEADER | 1431 |------------| 1432 | 0 | BUCKETS[0] 1433 | 2 | BUCKETS[1] 1434 | 5 | BUCKETS[2] 1435 | 6 | BUCKETS[3] 1436 | | ... 1437 | ... | BUCKETS[n_buckets] 1438 |------------| 1439 | 0x........ | HASHES[0] 1440 | 0x........ | HASHES[1] 1441 | 0x........ | HASHES[2] 1442 | 0x........ | HASHES[3] 1443 | 0x........ | HASHES[4] 1444 | 0x........ | HASHES[5] 1445 | 0x12345678 | HASHES[6] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1446 | 0x29273623 | HASHES[7] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1447 | 0x82638293 | HASHES[8] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1448 | 0x........ | HASHES[9] 1449 | 0x........ | HASHES[10] 1450 | 0x........ | HASHES[11] 1451 | 0x........ | HASHES[12] 1452 | 0x........ | HASHES[13] 1453 | 0x........ | HASHES[n_hashes] 1454 |------------| 1455 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[0] 1456 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[1] 1457 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[2] 1458 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[3] 1459 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[4] 1460 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[5] 1461 | 0x000034f0 | OFFSETS[6] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1462 | 0x00003500 | OFFSETS[7] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1463 | 0x00003550 | OFFSETS[8] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1464 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[9] 1465 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[10] 1466 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[11] 1467 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[12] 1468 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[13] 1469 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[n_hashes] 1470 |------------| 1471 | | 1472 | | 1473 | | 1474 | | 1475 | | 1476 |------------| 1477 0x000034f0: | 0x00001203 | .debug_str ("erase") 1478 | 0x00000004 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "erase" 1479 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1480 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1481 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1482 | 0x........ | HashData[3] 1483 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1484 |------------| 1485 0x00003500: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("collision") 1486 | 0x00000002 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "collision" 1487 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1488 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1489 | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("dump") 1490 | 0x00000003 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "dump" 1491 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1492 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1493 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1494 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1495 |------------| 1496 0x00003550: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("main") 1497 | 0x00000009 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "main" 1498 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1499 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1500 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1501 | 0x........ | HashData[3] 1502 | 0x........ | HashData[4] 1503 | 0x........ | HashData[5] 1504 | 0x........ | HashData[6] 1505 | 0x........ | HashData[7] 1506 | 0x........ | HashData[8] 1507 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1508 `------------' 1509 1510So we still have all of the same data, we just organize it more efficiently for 1511debugger lookup. If we repeat the same "``printf``" lookup from above, we 1512would hash "``printf``" and find it matches ``BUCKETS[3]`` by taking the 32 bit 1513hash value and modulo it by ``n_buckets``. ``BUCKETS[3]`` contains "6" which 1514is the index into the ``HASHES`` table. We would then compare any consecutive 151532 bit hashes values in the ``HASHES`` array as long as the hashes would be in 1516``BUCKETS[3]``. We do this by verifying that each subsequent hash value modulo 1517``n_buckets`` is still 3. In the case of a failed lookup we would access the 1518memory for ``BUCKETS[3]``, and then compare a few consecutive 32 bit hashes 1519before we know that we have no match. We don't end up marching through 1520multiple words of memory and we really keep the number of processor data cache 1521lines being accessed as small as possible. 1522 1523The string hash that is used for these lookup tables is the Daniel J. 1524Bernstein hash which is also used in the ELF ``GNU_HASH`` sections. It is a 1525very good hash for all kinds of names in programs with very few hash 1526collisions. 1527 1528Empty buckets are designated by using an invalid hash index of ``UINT32_MAX``. 1529 1530Details 1531^^^^^^^ 1532 1533These name hash tables are designed to be generic where specializations of the 1534table get to define additional data that goes into the header ("``HeaderData``"), 1535how the string value is stored ("``KeyType``") and the content of the data for each 1536hash value. 1537 1538Header Layout 1539""""""""""""" 1540 1541The header has a fixed part, and the specialized part. The exact format of the 1542header is: 1543 1544.. code-block:: c 1545 1546 struct Header 1547 { 1548 uint32_t magic; // 'HASH' magic value to allow endian detection 1549 uint16_t version; // Version number 1550 uint16_t hash_function; // The hash function enumeration that was used 1551 uint32_t bucket_count; // The number of buckets in this hash table 1552 uint32_t hashes_count; // The total number of unique hash values and hash data offsets in this table 1553 uint32_t header_data_len; // The bytes to skip to get to the hash indexes (buckets) for correct alignment 1554 // Specifically the length of the following HeaderData field - this does not 1555 // include the size of the preceding fields 1556 HeaderData header_data; // Implementation specific header data 1557 }; 1558 1559The header starts with a 32 bit "``magic``" value which must be ``'HASH'`` 1560encoded as an ASCII integer. This allows the detection of the start of the 1561hash table and also allows the table's byte order to be determined so the table 1562can be correctly extracted. The "``magic``" value is followed by a 16 bit 1563``version`` number which allows the table to be revised and modified in the 1564future. The current version number is 1. ``hash_function`` is a ``uint16_t`` 1565enumeration that specifies which hash function was used to produce this table. 1566The current values for the hash function enumerations include: 1567 1568.. code-block:: c 1569 1570 enum HashFunctionType 1571 { 1572 eHashFunctionDJB = 0u, // Daniel J Bernstein hash function 1573 }; 1574 1575``bucket_count`` is a 32 bit unsigned integer that represents how many buckets 1576are in the ``BUCKETS`` array. ``hashes_count`` is the number of unique 32 bit 1577hash values that are in the ``HASHES`` array, and is the same number of offsets 1578are contained in the ``OFFSETS`` array. ``header_data_len`` specifies the size 1579in bytes of the ``HeaderData`` that is filled in by specialized versions of 1580this table. 1581 1582Fixed Lookup 1583"""""""""""" 1584 1585The header is followed by the buckets, hashes, offsets, and hash value data. 1586 1587.. code-block:: c 1588 1589 struct FixedTable 1590 { 1591 uint32_t buckets[Header.bucket_count]; // An array of hash indexes into the "hashes[]" array below 1592 uint32_t hashes [Header.hashes_count]; // Every unique 32 bit hash for the entire table is in this table 1593 uint32_t offsets[Header.hashes_count]; // An offset that corresponds to each item in the "hashes[]" array above 1594 }; 1595 1596``buckets`` is an array of 32 bit indexes into the ``hashes`` array. The 1597``hashes`` array contains all of the 32 bit hash values for all names in the 1598hash table. Each hash in the ``hashes`` table has an offset in the ``offsets`` 1599array that points to the data for the hash value. 1600 1601This table setup makes it very easy to repurpose these tables to contain 1602different data, while keeping the lookup mechanism the same for all tables. 1603This layout also makes it possible to save the table to disk and map it in 1604later and do very efficient name lookups with little or no parsing. 1605 1606DWARF lookup tables can be implemented in a variety of ways and can store a lot 1607of information for each name. We want to make the DWARF tables extensible and 1608able to store the data efficiently so we have used some of the DWARF features 1609that enable efficient data storage to define exactly what kind of data we store 1610for each name. 1611 1612The ``HeaderData`` contains a definition of the contents of each HashData chunk. 1613We might want to store an offset to all of the debug information entries (DIEs) 1614for each name. To keep things extensible, we create a list of items, or 1615Atoms, that are contained in the data for each name. First comes the type of 1616the data in each atom: 1617 1618.. code-block:: c 1619 1620 enum AtomType 1621 { 1622 eAtomTypeNULL = 0u, 1623 eAtomTypeDIEOffset = 1u, // DIE offset, check form for encoding 1624 eAtomTypeCUOffset = 2u, // DIE offset of the compiler unit header that contains the item in question 1625 eAtomTypeTag = 3u, // DW_TAG_xxx value, should be encoded as DW_FORM_data1 (if no tags exceed 255) or DW_FORM_data2 1626 eAtomTypeNameFlags = 4u, // Flags from enum NameFlags 1627 eAtomTypeTypeFlags = 5u, // Flags from enum TypeFlags 1628 }; 1629 1630The enumeration values and their meanings are: 1631 1632.. code-block:: none 1633 1634 eAtomTypeNULL - a termination atom that specifies the end of the atom list 1635 eAtomTypeDIEOffset - an offset into the .debug_info section for the DWARF DIE for this name 1636 eAtomTypeCUOffset - an offset into the .debug_info section for the CU that contains the DIE 1637 eAtomTypeDIETag - The DW_TAG_XXX enumeration value so you don't have to parse the DWARF to see what it is 1638 eAtomTypeNameFlags - Flags for functions and global variables (isFunction, isInlined, isExternal...) 1639 eAtomTypeTypeFlags - Flags for types (isCXXClass, isObjCClass, ...) 1640 1641Then we allow each atom type to define the atom type and how the data for each 1642atom type data is encoded: 1643 1644.. code-block:: c 1645 1646 struct Atom 1647 { 1648 uint16_t type; // AtomType enum value 1649 uint16_t form; // DWARF DW_FORM_XXX defines 1650 }; 1651 1652The ``form`` type above is from the DWARF specification and defines the exact 1653encoding of the data for the Atom type. See the DWARF specification for the 1654``DW_FORM_`` definitions. 1655 1656.. code-block:: c 1657 1658 struct HeaderData 1659 { 1660 uint32_t die_offset_base; 1661 uint32_t atom_count; 1662 Atoms atoms[atom_count0]; 1663 }; 1664 1665``HeaderData`` defines the base DIE offset that should be added to any atoms 1666that are encoded using the ``DW_FORM_ref1``, ``DW_FORM_ref2``, 1667``DW_FORM_ref4``, ``DW_FORM_ref8`` or ``DW_FORM_ref_udata``. It also defines 1668what is contained in each ``HashData`` object -- ``Atom.form`` tells us how large 1669each field will be in the ``HashData`` and the ``Atom.type`` tells us how this data 1670should be interpreted. 1671 1672For the current implementations of the "``.apple_names``" (all functions + 1673globals), the "``.apple_types``" (names of all types that are defined), and 1674the "``.apple_namespaces``" (all namespaces), we currently set the ``Atom`` 1675array to be: 1676 1677.. code-block:: c 1678 1679 HeaderData.atom_count = 1; 1680 HeaderData.atoms[0].type = eAtomTypeDIEOffset; 1681 HeaderData.atoms[0].form = DW_FORM_data4; 1682 1683This defines the contents to be the DIE offset (eAtomTypeDIEOffset) that is 1684encoded as a 32 bit value (DW_FORM_data4). This allows a single name to have 1685multiple matching DIEs in a single file, which could come up with an inlined 1686function for instance. Future tables could include more information about the 1687DIE such as flags indicating if the DIE is a function, method, block, 1688or inlined. 1689 1690The KeyType for the DWARF table is a 32 bit string table offset into the 1691".debug_str" table. The ".debug_str" is the string table for the DWARF which 1692may already contain copies of all of the strings. This helps make sure, with 1693help from the compiler, that we reuse the strings between all of the DWARF 1694sections and keeps the hash table size down. Another benefit to having the 1695compiler generate all strings as DW_FORM_strp in the debug info, is that 1696DWARF parsing can be made much faster. 1697 1698After a lookup is made, we get an offset into the hash data. The hash data 1699needs to be able to deal with 32 bit hash collisions, so the chunk of data 1700at the offset in the hash data consists of a triple: 1701 1702.. code-block:: c 1703 1704 uint32_t str_offset 1705 uint32_t hash_data_count 1706 HashData[hash_data_count] 1707 1708If "str_offset" is zero, then the bucket contents are done. 99.9% of the 1709hash data chunks contain a single item (no 32 bit hash collision): 1710 1711.. code-block:: none 1712 1713 .------------. 1714 | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main") 1715 | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count 1716 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1717 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1718 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset 1719 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset 1720 | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain) 1721 `------------' 1722 1723If there are collisions, you will have multiple valid string offsets: 1724 1725.. code-block:: none 1726 1727 .------------. 1728 | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main") 1729 | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count 1730 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1731 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1732 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset 1733 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset 1734 | 0x00002023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0002023] => "print") 1735 | 0x00000002 | uint32_t HashData count 1736 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1737 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1738 | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain) 1739 `------------' 1740 1741Current testing with real world C++ binaries has shown that there is around 1 174232 bit hash collision per 100,000 name entries. 1743 1744Contents 1745^^^^^^^^ 1746 1747As we said, we want to strictly define exactly what is included in the 1748different tables. For DWARF, we have 3 tables: "``.apple_names``", 1749"``.apple_types``", and "``.apple_namespaces``". 1750 1751"``.apple_names``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose 1752``DW_TAG`` is a ``DW_TAG_label``, ``DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine``, or 1753``DW_TAG_subprogram`` that has address attributes: ``DW_AT_low_pc``, 1754``DW_AT_high_pc``, ``DW_AT_ranges`` or ``DW_AT_entry_pc``. It also contains 1755``DW_TAG_variable`` DIEs that have a ``DW_OP_addr`` in the location (global and 1756static variables). All global and static variables should be included, 1757including those scoped within functions and classes. For example using the 1758following code: 1759 1760.. code-block:: c 1761 1762 static int var = 0; 1763 1764 void f () 1765 { 1766 static int var = 0; 1767 } 1768 1769Both of the static ``var`` variables would be included in the table. All 1770functions should emit both their full names and their basenames. For C or C++, 1771the full name is the mangled name (if available) which is usually in the 1772``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, and the ``DW_AT_name`` contains the 1773function basename. If global or static variables have a mangled name in a 1774``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, this should be emitted along with the 1775simple name found in the ``DW_AT_name`` attribute. 1776 1777"``.apple_types``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose 1778tag is one of: 1779 1780* DW_TAG_array_type 1781* DW_TAG_class_type 1782* DW_TAG_enumeration_type 1783* DW_TAG_pointer_type 1784* DW_TAG_reference_type 1785* DW_TAG_string_type 1786* DW_TAG_structure_type 1787* DW_TAG_subroutine_type 1788* DW_TAG_typedef 1789* DW_TAG_union_type 1790* DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type 1791* DW_TAG_set_type 1792* DW_TAG_subrange_type 1793* DW_TAG_base_type 1794* DW_TAG_const_type 1795* DW_TAG_file_type 1796* DW_TAG_namelist 1797* DW_TAG_packed_type 1798* DW_TAG_volatile_type 1799* DW_TAG_restrict_type 1800* DW_TAG_atomic_type 1801* DW_TAG_interface_type 1802* DW_TAG_unspecified_type 1803* DW_TAG_shared_type 1804 1805Only entries with a ``DW_AT_name`` attribute are included, and the entry must 1806not be a forward declaration (``DW_AT_declaration`` attribute with a non-zero 1807value). For example, using the following code: 1808 1809.. code-block:: c 1810 1811 int main () 1812 { 1813 int *b = 0; 1814 return *b; 1815 } 1816 1817We get a few type DIEs: 1818 1819.. code-block:: none 1820 1821 0x00000067: TAG_base_type [5] 1822 AT_encoding( DW_ATE_signed ) 1823 AT_name( "int" ) 1824 AT_byte_size( 0x04 ) 1825 1826 0x0000006e: TAG_pointer_type [6] 1827 AT_type( {0x00000067} ( int ) ) 1828 AT_byte_size( 0x08 ) 1829 1830The DW_TAG_pointer_type is not included because it does not have a ``DW_AT_name``. 1831 1832"``.apple_namespaces``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_namespace`` DIEs. 1833If we run into a namespace that has no name this is an anonymous namespace, and 1834the name should be output as "``(anonymous namespace)``" (without the quotes). 1835Why? This matches the output of the ``abi::cxa_demangle()`` that is in the 1836standard C++ library that demangles mangled names. 1837 1838 1839Language Extensions and File Format Changes 1840^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1841 1842Objective-C Extensions 1843"""""""""""""""""""""" 1844 1845"``.apple_objc``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_subprogram`` DIEs for an 1846Objective-C class. The name used in the hash table is the name of the 1847Objective-C class itself. If the Objective-C class has a category, then an 1848entry is made for both the class name without the category, and for the class 1849name with the category. So if we have a DIE at offset 0x1234 with a name of 1850method "``-[NSString(my_additions) stringWithSpecialString:]``", we would add 1851an entry for "``NSString``" that points to DIE 0x1234, and an entry for 1852"``NSString(my_additions)``" that points to 0x1234. This allows us to quickly 1853track down all Objective-C methods for an Objective-C class when doing 1854expressions. It is needed because of the dynamic nature of Objective-C where 1855anyone can add methods to a class. The DWARF for Objective-C methods is also 1856emitted differently from C++ classes where the methods are not usually 1857contained in the class definition, they are scattered about across one or more 1858compile units. Categories can also be defined in different shared libraries. 1859So we need to be able to quickly find all of the methods and class functions 1860given the Objective-C class name, or quickly find all methods and class 1861functions for a class + category name. This table does not contain any 1862selector names, it just maps Objective-C class names (or class names + 1863category) to all of the methods and class functions. The selectors are added 1864as function basenames in the "``.debug_names``" section. 1865 1866In the "``.apple_names``" section for Objective-C functions, the full name is 1867the entire function name with the brackets ("``-[NSString 1868stringWithCString:]``") and the basename is the selector only 1869("``stringWithCString:``"). 1870 1871Mach-O Changes 1872"""""""""""""" 1873 1874The sections names for the apple hash tables are for non-mach-o files. For 1875mach-o files, the sections should be contained in the ``__DWARF`` segment with 1876names as follows: 1877 1878* "``.apple_names``" -> "``__apple_names``" 1879* "``.apple_types``" -> "``__apple_types``" 1880* "``.apple_namespaces``" -> "``__apple_namespac``" (16 character limit) 1881* "``.apple_objc``" -> "``__apple_objc``" 1882 1883.. _codeview: 1884 1885CodeView Debug Info Format 1886========================== 1887 1888LLVM supports emitting CodeView, the Microsoft debug info format, and this 1889section describes the design and implementation of that support. 1890 1891Format Background 1892----------------- 1893 1894CodeView as a format is clearly oriented around C++ debugging, and in C++, the 1895majority of debug information tends to be type information. Therefore, the 1896overriding design constraint of CodeView is the separation of type information 1897from other "symbol" information so that type information can be efficiently 1898merged across translation units. Both type information and symbol information is 1899generally stored as a sequence of records, where each record begins with a 190016-bit record size and a 16-bit record kind. 1901 1902Type information is usually stored in the ``.debug$T`` section of the object 1903file. All other debug info, such as line info, string table, symbol info, and 1904inlinee info, is stored in one or more ``.debug$S`` sections. There may only be 1905one ``.debug$T`` section per object file, since all other debug info refers to 1906it. If a PDB (enabled by the ``/Zi`` MSVC option) was used during compilation, 1907the ``.debug$T`` section will contain only an ``LF_TYPESERVER2`` record pointing 1908to the PDB. When using PDBs, symbol information appears to remain in the object 1909file ``.debug$S`` sections. 1910 1911Type records are referred to by their index, which is the number of records in 1912the stream before a given record plus ``0x1000``. Many common basic types, such 1913as the basic integral types and unqualified pointers to them, are represented 1914using type indices less than ``0x1000``. Such basic types are built in to 1915CodeView consumers and do not require type records. 1916 1917Each type record may only contain type indices that are less than its own type 1918index. This ensures that the graph of type stream references is acyclic. While 1919the source-level type graph may contain cycles through pointer types (consider a 1920linked list struct), these cycles are removed from the type stream by always 1921referring to the forward declaration record of user-defined record types. Only 1922"symbol" records in the ``.debug$S`` streams may refer to complete, 1923non-forward-declaration type records. 1924 1925Working with CodeView 1926--------------------- 1927 1928These are instructions for some common tasks for developers working to improve 1929LLVM's CodeView support. Most of them revolve around using the CodeView dumper 1930embedded in ``llvm-readobj``. 1931 1932* Testing MSVC's output:: 1933 1934 $ cl -c -Z7 foo.cpp # Use /Z7 to keep types in the object file 1935 $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj 1936 1937* Getting LLVM IR debug info out of Clang:: 1938 1939 $ clang -g -gcodeview --target=x86_64-windows-msvc foo.cpp -S -emit-llvm 1940 1941 Use this to generate LLVM IR for LLVM test cases. 1942 1943* Generate and dump CodeView from LLVM IR metadata:: 1944 1945 $ llc foo.ll -filetype=obj -o foo.obj 1946 $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj > foo.txt 1947 1948 Use this pattern in lit test cases and FileCheck the output of llvm-readobj 1949 1950Improving LLVM's CodeView support is a process of finding interesting type 1951records, constructing a C++ test case that makes MSVC emit those records, 1952dumping the records, understanding them, and then generating equivalent records 1953in LLVM's backend. 1954 1955Testing Debug Info Preservation in Optimizations 1956================================================ 1957 1958The following paragraphs are an introduction to the debugify utility 1959and examples of how to use it in regression tests to check debug info 1960preservation after optimizations. 1961 1962The ``debugify`` utility 1963------------------------ 1964 1965The ``debugify`` synthetic debug info testing utility consists of two 1966main parts. The ``debugify`` pass and the ``check-debugify`` one. They are 1967meant to be used with ``opt`` for development purposes. 1968 1969The first applies synthetic debug information to every instruction of the module, 1970while the latter checks that this DI is still available after an optimization 1971has occurred, reporting any errors/warnings while doing so. 1972 1973The instructions are assigned sequentially increasing line locations, 1974and are immediately used by debug value intrinsics when possible. 1975 1976For example, here is a module before: 1977 1978.. code-block:: llvm 1979 1980 define void @f(i32* %x) { 1981 entry: 1982 %x.addr = alloca i32*, align 8 1983 store i32* %x, i32** %x.addr, align 8 1984 %0 = load i32*, i32** %x.addr, align 8 1985 store i32 10, i32* %0, align 4 1986 ret void 1987 } 1988 1989and after running ``opt -debugify`` on it we get: 1990 1991.. code-block:: text 1992 1993 define void @f(i32* %x) !dbg !6 { 1994 entry: 1995 %x.addr = alloca i32*, align 8, !dbg !12 1996 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32** %x.addr, metadata !9, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !12 1997 store i32* %x, i32** %x.addr, align 8, !dbg !13 1998 %0 = load i32*, i32** %x.addr, align 8, !dbg !14 1999 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32* %0, metadata !11, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !14 2000 store i32 10, i32* %0, align 4, !dbg !15 2001 ret void, !dbg !16 2002 } 2003 2004 !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0} 2005 !llvm.debugify = !{!3, !4} 2006 !llvm.module.flags = !{!5} 2007 2008 !0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C, file: !1, producer: "debugify", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2) 2009 !1 = !DIFile(filename: "debugify-sample.ll", directory: "/") 2010 !2 = !{} 2011 !3 = !{i32 5} 2012 !4 = !{i32 2} 2013 !5 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} 2014 !6 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", linkageName: "f", scope: null, file: !1, line: 1, type: !7, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, isOptimized: true, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !8) 2015 !7 = !DISubroutineType(types: !2) 2016 !8 = !{!9, !11} 2017 !9 = !DILocalVariable(name: "1", scope: !6, file: !1, line: 1, type: !10) 2018 !10 = !DIBasicType(name: "ty64", size: 64, encoding: DW_ATE_unsigned) 2019 !11 = !DILocalVariable(name: "2", scope: !6, file: !1, line: 3, type: !10) 2020 !12 = !DILocation(line: 1, column: 1, scope: !6) 2021 !13 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 1, scope: !6) 2022 !14 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 1, scope: !6) 2023 !15 = !DILocation(line: 4, column: 1, scope: !6) 2024 !16 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 1, scope: !6) 2025 2026The following is an example of the -check-debugify output: 2027 2028.. code-block:: none 2029 2030 $ opt -enable-debugify -loop-vectorize llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/i8-induction.ll -disable-output 2031 ERROR: Instruction with empty DebugLoc in function f -- %index = phi i32 [ 0, %vector.ph ], [ %index.next, %vector.body ] 2032 2033Errors/warnings can range from instructions with empty debug location to an 2034instruction having a type that's incompatible with the source variable it describes, 2035all the way to missing lines and missing debug value intrinsics. 2036 2037Fixing errors 2038^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 2039 2040Each of the errors above has a relevant API available to fix it. 2041 2042* In the case of missing debug location, ``Instruction::setDebugLoc`` or possibly 2043 ``IRBuilder::setCurrentDebugLocation`` when using a Builder and the new location 2044 should be reused. 2045 2046* When a debug value has incompatible type ``llvm::replaceAllDbgUsesWith`` can be used. 2047 After a RAUW call an incompatible type error can occur because RAUW does not handle 2048 widening and narrowing of variables while ``llvm::replaceAllDbgUsesWith`` does. It is 2049 also capable of changing the DWARF expression used by the debugger to describe the variable. 2050 It also prevents use-before-def by salvaging or deleting invalid debug values. 2051 2052* When a debug value is missing ``llvm::salvageDebugInfo`` can be used when no replacement 2053 exists, or ``llvm::replaceAllDbgUsesWith`` when a replacement exists. 2054 2055Using ``debugify`` 2056------------------ 2057 2058In order for ``check-debugify`` to work, the DI must be coming from 2059``debugify``. Thus, modules with existing DI will be skipped. 2060 2061The most straightforward way to use ``debugify`` is as follows:: 2062 2063 $ opt -debugify -pass-to-test -check-debugify sample.ll 2064 2065This will inject synthetic DI to ``sample.ll`` run the ``pass-to-test`` 2066and then check for missing DI. 2067 2068Some other ways to run debugify are avaliable: 2069 2070.. code-block:: bash 2071 2072 # Same as the above example. 2073 $ opt -enable-debugify -pass-to-test sample.ll 2074 2075 # Suppresses verbose debugify output. 2076 $ opt -enable-debugify -debugify-quiet -pass-to-test sample.ll 2077 2078 # Prepend -debugify before and append -check-debugify -strip after 2079 # each pass on the pipeline (similar to -verify-each). 2080 $ opt -debugify-each -O2 sample.ll 2081 2082``debugify`` can also be used to test a backend, e.g: 2083 2084.. code-block:: bash 2085 2086 $ opt -debugify < sample.ll | llc -o - 2087 2088``debugify`` in regression tests 2089^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 2090 2091The ``-debugify`` pass is especially helpful when it comes to testing that 2092a given pass preserves DI while transforming the module. For this to work, 2093the ``-debugify`` output must be stable enough to use in regression tests. 2094Changes to this pass are not allowed to break existing tests. 2095 2096It allows us to test for DI loss in the same tests we check that the 2097transformation is actually doing what it should. 2098 2099Here is an example from ``test/Transforms/InstCombine/cast-mul-select.ll``: 2100 2101.. code-block:: llvm 2102 2103 ; RUN: opt < %s -debugify -instcombine -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DEBUGINFO 2104 2105 define i32 @mul(i32 %x, i32 %y) { 2106 ; DBGINFO-LABEL: @mul( 2107 ; DBGINFO-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = mul i32 {{.*}} 2108 ; DBGINFO-NEXT: call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 [[C]] 2109 ; DBGINFO-NEXT: [[D:%.*]] = and i32 {{.*}} 2110 ; DBGINFO-NEXT: call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 [[D]] 2111 2112 %A = trunc i32 %x to i8 2113 %B = trunc i32 %y to i8 2114 %C = mul i8 %A, %B 2115 %D = zext i8 %C to i32 2116 ret i32 %D 2117 } 2118 2119Here we test that the two ``dbg.value`` instrinsics are preserved and 2120are correctly pointing to the ``[[C]]`` and ``[[D]]`` variables. 2121 2122.. note:: 2123 2124 Note, that when writing this kind of regression tests, it is important 2125 to make them as robust as possible. That's why we should try to avoid 2126 hardcoding line/variable numbers in check lines. If for example you test 2127 for a ``DILocation`` to have a specific line number, and someone later adds 2128 an instruction before the one we check the test will fail. In the cases this 2129 can't be avoided (say, if a test wouldn't be precise enough), moving the 2130 test to its own file is preferred. 2131