1FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier 2=================================================== 3 4SYNOPSIS 5-------- 6 7:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*] 8 9DESCRIPTION 10----------- 11 12:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one 13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This 14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that 15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information 16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to 17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different 18inputs in one file in a specific order. 19 20The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to 21match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the 22:option:`--input-file` option is used. 23 24OPTIONS 25------- 26 27.. option:: -help 28 29 Print a summary of command line options. 30 31.. option:: --check-prefix prefix 32 33 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to 34 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``". 35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input 36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the 37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more 38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might 39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same. 40 41.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,... 42 43 An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be 44 specified as a comma separated list. 45 46.. option:: --input-file filename 47 48 File to check (defaults to stdin). 49 50.. option:: --match-full-lines 51 52 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This 53 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire 54 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless 55 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative 56 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!) 57 58 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or 59 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive 60 check pattern. 61 62.. option:: --strict-whitespace 63 64 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and 65 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab). 66 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line 67 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes. 68 69.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern 70 71 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive 72 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with 73 ``CHECK-NOT``\ s. 74 75 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing 76 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang 77 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain 78 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns. 79 80.. option:: --enable-var-scope 81 82 Enables scope for regex variables. 83 84 Variables with names that start with ``$`` are considered global and 85 remain set throughout the file. 86 87 All other variables get undefined after each encountered ``CHECK-LABEL``. 88 89.. option:: -D<VAR=VALUE> 90 91 Sets a filecheck variable ``VAR`` with value ``VALUE`` that can be used in 92 ``CHECK:`` lines. 93 94.. option:: -version 95 96 Show the version number of this program. 97 98.. option:: --allow-deprecated-dag-overlap 99 100 Enable overlapping among matches in a group of consecutive ``CHECK-DAG:`` 101 directives. This option is deprecated and is only provided for convenience 102 as old tests are migrated to the new non-overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:`` 103 implementation. 104 105EXIT STATUS 106----------- 107 108If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents, 109it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a 110non-zero value. 111 112TUTORIAL 113-------- 114 115FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN 116line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks 117like this: 118 119.. code-block:: llvm 120 121 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s 122 123This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe 124that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This 125means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output) 126against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by 127"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file 128(after the RUN line): 129 130.. code-block:: llvm 131 132 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) { 133 entry: 134 ; CHECK: sub1: 135 ; CHECK: subl 136 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v) 137 ret void 138 } 139 140 define void @inc4(i64* %p) { 141 entry: 142 ; CHECK: inc4: 143 ; CHECK: incq 144 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1) 145 ret void 146 } 147 148Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can 149see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code 150output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to 151verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify. 152 153The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that 154must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace 155differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents 156of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly. 157 158One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging 159test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above 160is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match 161unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere 162else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``" 163exists anywhere in the file. 164 165The FileCheck -check-prefix option 166~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 167 168The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test 169configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many 170circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with 171:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example: 172 173.. code-block:: llvm 174 175 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \ 176 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32 177 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \ 178 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64 179 180 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind { 181 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1 182 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1 183 ; X32: pinsrd_1: 184 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0 185 186 ; X64: pinsrd_1: 187 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0 188 } 189 190In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with 191both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation. 192 193The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive 194~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 195 196Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches 197happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In 198this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify 199this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``". 200For example, something like this works as you'd expect: 201 202.. code-block:: llvm 203 204 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) { 205 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16 206 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0 207 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3, 208 <2 x double> %tmp7, 209 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 > 210 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16 211 ret void 212 213 ; CHECK: t2: 214 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax 215 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0 216 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0 217 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax 218 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax) 219 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret 220 } 221 222"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one 223newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be 224the first directive in a file. 225 226The "CHECK-SAME:" directive 227~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 228 229Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen 230on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" 231and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom 232check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``". 233 234"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``" 235(described below). 236 237For example, the following works like you'd expect: 238 239.. code-block:: llvm 240 241 !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2) 242 243 ; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5, 244 ; CHECK-NOT: column: 245 ; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]] 246 247"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between 248it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first 249directive in a file. 250 251The "CHECK-EMPTY:" directive 252~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 253 254If you need to check that the next line has nothing on it, not even whitespace, 255you can use the "``CHECK-EMPTY:``" directive. 256 257.. code-block:: llvm 258 259 foo 260 261 bar 262 ; CHECK: foo 263 ; CHECK-EMPTY: 264 ; CHECK-NEXT: bar 265 266Just like "``CHECK-NEXT:``" the directive will fail if there is more than one 267newline before it finds the next blank line, and it cannot be the first 268directive in a file. 269 270The "CHECK-NOT:" directive 271~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 272 273The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur 274between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For 275example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this 276can be used: 277 278.. code-block:: llvm 279 280 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) { 281 store i32 %V, i32* %P 282 283 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8* 284 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2 285 286 %A = load i8* %P3 287 ret i8 %A 288 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0 289 ; CHECK-NOT: load 290 ; CHECK: ret i8 291 } 292 293The "CHECK-DAG:" directive 294~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 295 296If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential 297order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or 298before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits 299vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks 300in the natural order: 301 302.. code-block:: c++ 303 304 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s 305 306 struct Foo { virtual void method(); }; 307 Foo f; // emit vtable 308 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo = 309 310 struct Bar { virtual void method(); }; 311 Bar b; 312 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar = 313 314``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to 315exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result, 316the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all 317occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind 318occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example, 319 320.. code-block:: llvm 321 322 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE 323 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT 324 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER 325 326This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``. 327 328With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological 329orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use. 330It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output 331sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example, 332 333.. code-block:: llvm 334 335 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2 336 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4 337 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]] 338 339In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed. 340 341If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block, 342be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use. 343 344So, for instance, the code below will pass: 345 346.. code-block:: text 347 348 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0] 349 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1] 350 vmov.32 d0[1] 351 vmov.32 d0[0] 352 353While this other code, will not: 354 355.. code-block:: text 356 357 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0] 358 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1] 359 vmov.32 d1[1] 360 vmov.32 d0[0] 361 362While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of 363register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before 364use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because 365of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask 366real bugs away. 367 368In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks. 369 370A ``CHECK-DAG:`` directive skips matches that overlap the matches of any 371preceding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block. Not only 372is this non-overlapping behavior consistent with other directives, but it's 373also necessary to handle sets of non-unique strings or patterns. For example, 374the following directives look for unordered log entries for two tasks in a 375parallel program, such as the OpenMP runtime: 376 377.. code-block:: text 378 379 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin 380 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end 381 // 382 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin 383 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end 384 385The second pair of directives is guaranteed not to match the same log entries 386as the first pair even though the patterns are identical and even if the text 387of the log entries is identical because the thread ID manages to be reused. 388 389The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive 390~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 391 392Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one 393or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a 394later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check 395flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the 396actual source of the problem. 397 398In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``" 399directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK`` 400directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line 401matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in 402``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or 403other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides 404the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently, 405preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block. 406If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, all local variables are cleared at the 407beginning of the block. 408 409For example, 410 411.. code-block:: llvm 412 413 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) { 414 entry: 415 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base: 416 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0 417 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base 418 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]] 419 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A* 420 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0) 421 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B* 422 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x) 423 ret %struct.C* %this 424 } 425 426 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) { 427 entry: 428 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base: 429 430The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three 431``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the 432``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in 433the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail, 434FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test 435failures to be detected in a single invocation. 436 437There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that 438correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must 439simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified. 440 441``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses. 442 443FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax 444~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 445 446All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match. 447For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For 448some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this, 449FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings, 450surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. FileCheck implements a POSIX 451regular expression matcher; it supports Extended POSIX regular expressions 452(ERE). Because we want to use fixed string matching for a majority of what we 453do, FileCheck has been designed to support mixing and matching fixed string 454matching with regular expressions. This allows you to write things like this: 455 456.. code-block:: llvm 457 458 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}} 459 460In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm 461register will be allowed. 462 463Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are 464visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double 465braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double 466braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like 467``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern. 468 469FileCheck Variables 470~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 471 472It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again 473later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register, 474but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this, 475:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into 476patterns. Here is a simple example: 477 478.. code-block:: llvm 479 480 ; CHECK: test5: 481 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]] 482 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]] 483 484The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the 485variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in 486``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck` 487variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can 488be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*``. If a colon follows the name, 489then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use. 490 491:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always 492get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they 493were defined on. For example: 494 495.. code-block:: llvm 496 497 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]] 498 499Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register, 500and don't care exactly which register it is. 501 502If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, variables with names that 503start with ``$`` are considered to be global. All others variables are 504local. All local variables get undefined at the beginning of each 505CHECK-LABEL block. Global variables are not affected by CHECK-LABEL. 506This makes it easier to ensure that individual tests are not affected 507by variables set in preceding tests. 508 509FileCheck Expressions 510~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 511 512Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the 513match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain 514fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute 515line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers 516change due to text addition or deletion. 517 518To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``, 519``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These 520expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an 521optional integer offset). 522 523This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include 524relative line number references, for example: 525 526.. code-block:: c++ 527 528 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator 529 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}} 530 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}} 531 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}} 532 int a 533 534Matching Newline Characters 535~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 536 537To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class 538``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern: 539 540.. code-block:: c++ 541 542 // CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd" 543 544matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump): 545 546.. code-block:: text 547 548 DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000233) 549 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd") 550 551letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value 552``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``". 553