1FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier 2=================================================== 3 4SYNOPSIS 5-------- 6 7:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*] 8 9DESCRIPTION 10----------- 11 12:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one 13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This 14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that 15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information 16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to 17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different 18inputs in one file in a specific order. 19 20The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to 21match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the 22:option:`--input-file` option is used. 23 24OPTIONS 25------- 26 27.. option:: -help 28 29 Print a summary of command line options. 30 31.. option:: --check-prefix prefix 32 33 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to 34 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``". 35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input 36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the 37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more 38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might 39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same. 40 41.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,... 42 43 An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be 44 specified as a comma separated list. 45 46.. option:: --input-file filename 47 48 File to check (defaults to stdin). 49 50.. option:: --match-full-lines 51 52 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This 53 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire 54 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless 55 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative 56 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!) 57 58 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or 59 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive 60 check pattern. 61 62.. option:: --strict-whitespace 63 64 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and 65 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab). 66 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line 67 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes. 68 69.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern 70 71 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive 72 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with 73 ``CHECK-NOT``\ s. 74 75 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing 76 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang 77 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain 78 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns. 79 80.. option:: --enable-var-scope 81 82 Enables scope for regex variables. 83 84 Variables with names that start with ``$`` are considered global and 85 remain set throughout the file. 86 87 All other variables get undefined after each encountered ``CHECK-LABEL``. 88 89.. option:: -D<VAR=VALUE> 90 91 Sets a filecheck variable ``VAR`` with value ``VALUE`` that can be used in 92 ``CHECK:`` lines. 93 94.. option:: -version 95 96 Show the version number of this program. 97 98.. option:: -v 99 100 Print directive pattern matches. 101 102.. option:: -vv 103 104 Print information helpful in diagnosing internal FileCheck issues, such as 105 discarded overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:`` matches, implicit EOF pattern matches, 106 and ``CHECK-NOT:`` patterns that do not have matches. Implies ``-v``. 107 108.. option:: --allow-deprecated-dag-overlap 109 110 Enable overlapping among matches in a group of consecutive ``CHECK-DAG:`` 111 directives. This option is deprecated and is only provided for convenience 112 as old tests are migrated to the new non-overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:`` 113 implementation. 114 115EXIT STATUS 116----------- 117 118If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents, 119it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a 120non-zero value. 121 122TUTORIAL 123-------- 124 125FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN 126line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks 127like this: 128 129.. code-block:: llvm 130 131 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s 132 133This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe 134that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This 135means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output) 136against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by 137"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file 138(after the RUN line): 139 140.. code-block:: llvm 141 142 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) { 143 entry: 144 ; CHECK: sub1: 145 ; CHECK: subl 146 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v) 147 ret void 148 } 149 150 define void @inc4(i64* %p) { 151 entry: 152 ; CHECK: inc4: 153 ; CHECK: incq 154 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1) 155 ret void 156 } 157 158Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can 159see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code 160output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to 161verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify. 162 163The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that 164must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace 165differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents 166of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly. 167 168One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging 169test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above 170is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match 171unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere 172else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``" 173exists anywhere in the file. 174 175The FileCheck -check-prefix option 176~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 177 178The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test 179configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many 180circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with 181:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example: 182 183.. code-block:: llvm 184 185 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \ 186 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32 187 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \ 188 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64 189 190 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind { 191 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1 192 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1 193 ; X32: pinsrd_1: 194 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0 195 196 ; X64: pinsrd_1: 197 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0 198 } 199 200In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with 201both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation. 202 203The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive 204~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 205 206Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches 207happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In 208this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify 209this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``". 210For example, something like this works as you'd expect: 211 212.. code-block:: llvm 213 214 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) { 215 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16 216 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0 217 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3, 218 <2 x double> %tmp7, 219 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 > 220 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16 221 ret void 222 223 ; CHECK: t2: 224 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax 225 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0 226 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0 227 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax 228 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax) 229 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret 230 } 231 232"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one 233newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be 234the first directive in a file. 235 236The "CHECK-SAME:" directive 237~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 238 239Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen 240on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" 241and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom 242check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``". 243 244"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``" 245(described below). 246 247For example, the following works like you'd expect: 248 249.. code-block:: llvm 250 251 !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2) 252 253 ; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5, 254 ; CHECK-NOT: column: 255 ; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]] 256 257"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between 258it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first 259directive in a file. 260 261The "CHECK-EMPTY:" directive 262~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 263 264If you need to check that the next line has nothing on it, not even whitespace, 265you can use the "``CHECK-EMPTY:``" directive. 266 267.. code-block:: llvm 268 269 foo 270 271 bar 272 ; CHECK: foo 273 ; CHECK-EMPTY: 274 ; CHECK-NEXT: bar 275 276Just like "``CHECK-NEXT:``" the directive will fail if there is more than one 277newline before it finds the next blank line, and it cannot be the first 278directive in a file. 279 280The "CHECK-NOT:" directive 281~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 282 283The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur 284between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For 285example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this 286can be used: 287 288.. code-block:: llvm 289 290 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) { 291 store i32 %V, i32* %P 292 293 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8* 294 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2 295 296 %A = load i8* %P3 297 ret i8 %A 298 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0 299 ; CHECK-NOT: load 300 ; CHECK: ret i8 301 } 302 303The "CHECK-DAG:" directive 304~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 305 306If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential 307order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or 308before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits 309vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks 310in the natural order: 311 312.. code-block:: c++ 313 314 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s 315 316 struct Foo { virtual void method(); }; 317 Foo f; // emit vtable 318 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo = 319 320 struct Bar { virtual void method(); }; 321 Bar b; 322 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar = 323 324``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to 325exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result, 326the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all 327occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind 328occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example, 329 330.. code-block:: llvm 331 332 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE 333 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT 334 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER 335 336This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``. 337 338With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological 339orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use. 340It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output 341sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example, 342 343.. code-block:: llvm 344 345 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2 346 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4 347 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]] 348 349In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed. 350 351If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block, 352be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use. 353 354So, for instance, the code below will pass: 355 356.. code-block:: text 357 358 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0] 359 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1] 360 vmov.32 d0[1] 361 vmov.32 d0[0] 362 363While this other code, will not: 364 365.. code-block:: text 366 367 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0] 368 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1] 369 vmov.32 d1[1] 370 vmov.32 d0[0] 371 372While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of 373register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before 374use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because 375of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask 376real bugs away. 377 378In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks. 379 380A ``CHECK-DAG:`` directive skips matches that overlap the matches of any 381preceding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block. Not only 382is this non-overlapping behavior consistent with other directives, but it's 383also necessary to handle sets of non-unique strings or patterns. For example, 384the following directives look for unordered log entries for two tasks in a 385parallel program, such as the OpenMP runtime: 386 387.. code-block:: text 388 389 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin 390 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end 391 // 392 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin 393 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end 394 395The second pair of directives is guaranteed not to match the same log entries 396as the first pair even though the patterns are identical and even if the text 397of the log entries is identical because the thread ID manages to be reused. 398 399The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive 400~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 401 402Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one 403or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a 404later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check 405flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the 406actual source of the problem. 407 408In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``" 409directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK`` 410directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line 411matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in 412``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or 413other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides 414the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently, 415preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block. 416If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, all local variables are cleared at the 417beginning of the block. 418 419For example, 420 421.. code-block:: llvm 422 423 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) { 424 entry: 425 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base: 426 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0 427 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base 428 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]] 429 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A* 430 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0) 431 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B* 432 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x) 433 ret %struct.C* %this 434 } 435 436 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) { 437 entry: 438 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base: 439 440The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three 441``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the 442``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in 443the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail, 444FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test 445failures to be detected in a single invocation. 446 447There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that 448correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must 449simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified. 450 451``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses. 452 453FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax 454~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 455 456All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match. 457For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For 458some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this, 459FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings, 460surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. FileCheck implements a POSIX 461regular expression matcher; it supports Extended POSIX regular expressions 462(ERE). Because we want to use fixed string matching for a majority of what we 463do, FileCheck has been designed to support mixing and matching fixed string 464matching with regular expressions. This allows you to write things like this: 465 466.. code-block:: llvm 467 468 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}} 469 470In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm 471register will be allowed. 472 473Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are 474visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double 475braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double 476braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like 477``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern. 478 479FileCheck Variables 480~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 481 482It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again 483later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register, 484but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this, 485:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into 486patterns. Here is a simple example: 487 488.. code-block:: llvm 489 490 ; CHECK: test5: 491 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]] 492 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]] 493 494The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the 495variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in 496``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck` 497variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can 498be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*``. If a colon follows the name, 499then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use. 500 501:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always 502get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they 503were defined on. For example: 504 505.. code-block:: llvm 506 507 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]] 508 509Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register, 510and don't care exactly which register it is. 511 512If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, variables with names that 513start with ``$`` are considered to be global. All others variables are 514local. All local variables get undefined at the beginning of each 515CHECK-LABEL block. Global variables are not affected by CHECK-LABEL. 516This makes it easier to ensure that individual tests are not affected 517by variables set in preceding tests. 518 519FileCheck Expressions 520~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 521 522Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the 523match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain 524fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute 525line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers 526change due to text addition or deletion. 527 528To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``, 529``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These 530expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an 531optional integer offset). 532 533This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include 534relative line number references, for example: 535 536.. code-block:: c++ 537 538 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator 539 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}} 540 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}} 541 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}} 542 int a 543 544Matching Newline Characters 545~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 546 547To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class 548``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern: 549 550.. code-block:: c++ 551 552 // CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd" 553 554matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump): 555 556.. code-block:: text 557 558 DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000233) 559 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd") 560 561letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value 562``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``". 563