1FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier 2=================================================== 3 4SYNOPSIS 5-------- 6 7:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*] 8 9DESCRIPTION 10----------- 11 12:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one 13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This 14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that 15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information 16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to 17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different 18inputs in one file in a specific order. 19 20The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to 21match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the 22:option:`--input-file` option is used. 23 24OPTIONS 25------- 26 27.. option:: -help 28 29 Print a summary of command line options. 30 31.. option:: --check-prefix prefix 32 33 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to 34 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``". 35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input 36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the 37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more 38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might 39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same. 40 41.. option:: --input-file filename 42 43 File to check (defaults to stdin). 44 45.. option:: --match-full-lines 46 47 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This 48 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire 49 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless 50 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative 51 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!) 52 53 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or 54 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive 55 check pattern. 56 57.. option:: --strict-whitespace 58 59 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and 60 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab). 61 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line 62 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes. 63 64.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern 65 66 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive 67 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with 68 ``CHECK-NOT``\ s. 69 70 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing 71 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang 72 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain 73 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns. 74 75.. option:: -version 76 77 Show the version number of this program. 78 79EXIT STATUS 80----------- 81 82If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents, 83it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a 84non-zero value. 85 86TUTORIAL 87-------- 88 89FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN 90line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks 91like this: 92 93.. code-block:: llvm 94 95 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s 96 97This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe 98that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This 99means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output) 100against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by 101"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file 102(after the RUN line): 103 104.. code-block:: llvm 105 106 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) { 107 entry: 108 ; CHECK: sub1: 109 ; CHECK: subl 110 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v) 111 ret void 112 } 113 114 define void @inc4(i64* %p) { 115 entry: 116 ; CHECK: inc4: 117 ; CHECK: incq 118 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1) 119 ret void 120 } 121 122Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can 123see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code 124output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to 125verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify. 126 127The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that 128must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace 129differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents 130of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly. 131 132One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging 133test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above 134is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match 135unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere 136else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``" 137exists anywhere in the file. 138 139The FileCheck -check-prefix option 140~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 141 142The FileCheck :option:`-check-prefix` option allows multiple test 143configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many 144circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with 145:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example: 146 147.. code-block:: llvm 148 149 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \ 150 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32 151 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \ 152 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64 153 154 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind { 155 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1 156 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1 157 ; X32: pinsrd_1: 158 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0 159 160 ; X64: pinsrd_1: 161 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0 162 } 163 164In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with 165both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation. 166 167The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive 168~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 169 170Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches 171happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In 172this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify 173this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``". 174For example, something like this works as you'd expect: 175 176.. code-block:: llvm 177 178 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) { 179 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16 180 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0 181 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3, 182 <2 x double> %tmp7, 183 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 > 184 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16 185 ret void 186 187 ; CHECK: t2: 188 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax 189 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0 190 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0 191 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax 192 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax) 193 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret 194 } 195 196"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one 197newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be 198the first directive in a file. 199 200The "CHECK-SAME:" directive 201~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 202 203Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen 204on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" 205and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom 206check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``". 207 208"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``" 209(described below). 210 211For example, the following works like you'd expect: 212 213.. code-block:: llvm 214 215 !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2) 216 217 ; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5, 218 ; CHECK-NOT: column: 219 ; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]] 220 221"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between 222it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first 223directive in a file. 224 225The "CHECK-NOT:" directive 226~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 227 228The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur 229between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For 230example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this 231can be used: 232 233.. code-block:: llvm 234 235 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) { 236 store i32 %V, i32* %P 237 238 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8* 239 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2 240 241 %A = load i8* %P3 242 ret i8 %A 243 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0 244 ; CHECK-NOT: load 245 ; CHECK: ret i8 246 } 247 248The "CHECK-DAG:" directive 249~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 250 251If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential 252order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or 253before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits 254vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks 255in the natural order: 256 257.. code-block:: c++ 258 259 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s 260 261 struct Foo { virtual void method(); }; 262 Foo f; // emit vtable 263 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo = 264 265 struct Bar { virtual void method(); }; 266 Bar b; 267 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar = 268 269``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to 270exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result, 271the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all 272occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind 273occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example, 274 275.. code-block:: llvm 276 277 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE 278 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT 279 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER 280 281This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``. 282 283With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological 284orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use. 285It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output 286sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example, 287 288.. code-block:: llvm 289 290 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2 291 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4 292 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]] 293 294In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed. 295 296If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block, 297be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use. 298 299So, for instance, the code below will pass: 300 301.. code-block:: llvm 302 303 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0] 304 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1] 305 vmov.32 d0[1] 306 vmov.32 d0[0] 307 308While this other code, will not: 309 310.. code-block:: llvm 311 312 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0] 313 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1] 314 vmov.32 d1[1] 315 vmov.32 d0[0] 316 317While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of 318register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before 319use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because 320of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask 321real bugs away. 322 323In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks. 324 325The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive 326~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 327 328Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one 329or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a 330later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check 331flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the 332actual source of the problem. 333 334In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``" 335directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK`` 336directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line 337matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in 338``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or 339other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides 340the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently, 341preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block. 342For example, 343 344.. code-block:: llvm 345 346 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) { 347 entry: 348 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base: 349 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0 350 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base 351 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]] 352 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A* 353 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0) 354 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B* 355 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x) 356 ret %struct.C* %this 357 } 358 359 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) { 360 entry: 361 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base: 362 363The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three 364``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the 365``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in 366the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail, 367FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test 368failures to be detected in a single invocation. 369 370There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that 371correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must 372simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified. 373 374``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses. 375 376FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax 377~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 378 379All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match. 380For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For 381some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this, 382FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings, 383surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. Because we want to use fixed 384string matching for a majority of what we do, FileCheck has been designed to 385support mixing and matching fixed string matching with regular expressions. 386This allows you to write things like this: 387 388.. code-block:: llvm 389 390 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}} 391 392In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm 393register will be allowed. 394 395Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are 396visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double 397braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double 398braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like 399``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern. 400 401FileCheck Variables 402~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 403 404It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again 405later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register, 406but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this, 407:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into 408patterns. Here is a simple example: 409 410.. code-block:: llvm 411 412 ; CHECK: test5: 413 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]] 414 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]] 415 416The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the 417variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in 418``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck` 419variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can 420be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*``. If a colon follows the name, 421then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use. 422 423:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always 424get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they 425were defined on. For example: 426 427.. code-block:: llvm 428 429 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]] 430 431Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register, 432and don't care exactly which register it is. 433 434FileCheck Expressions 435~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 436 437Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the 438match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain 439fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute 440line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers 441change due to text addition or deletion. 442 443To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``, 444``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These 445expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an 446optional integer offset). 447 448This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include 449relative line number references, for example: 450 451.. code-block:: c++ 452 453 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator 454 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}} 455 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}} 456 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}} 457 int a 458 459