1FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier 2=================================================== 3 4SYNOPSIS 5-------- 6 7:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*] 8 9DESCRIPTION 10----------- 11 12:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one 13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This 14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that 15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information 16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to 17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different 18inputs in one file in a specific order. 19 20The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to 21match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the 22:option:`--input-file` option is used. 23 24OPTIONS 25------- 26 27Options are parsed from the environment variable ``FILECHECK_OPTS`` 28and from the command line. 29 30.. option:: -help 31 32 Print a summary of command line options. 33 34.. option:: --check-prefix prefix 35 36 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to 37 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``". 38 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input 39 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the 40 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more 41 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might 42 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same. 43 44.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,... 45 46 An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be 47 specified as a comma separated list. 48 49.. option:: --input-file filename 50 51 File to check (defaults to stdin). 52 53.. option:: --match-full-lines 54 55 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This 56 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire 57 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless 58 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative 59 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!) 60 61 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or 62 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive 63 check pattern. 64 65.. option:: --strict-whitespace 66 67 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and 68 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab). 69 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line 70 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes. 71 72.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern 73 74 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive 75 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with 76 ``CHECK-NOT``\ s. 77 78 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing 79 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang 80 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain 81 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns. 82 83.. option:: --dump-input <mode> 84 85 Dump input to stderr, adding annotations representing currently enabled 86 diagnostics. Do this either 'always', on 'fail', or 'never'. Specify 'help' 87 to explain the dump format and quit. 88 89.. option:: --dump-input-on-failure 90 91 When the check fails, dump all of the original input. This option is 92 deprecated in favor of `--dump-input=fail`. 93 94.. option:: --enable-var-scope 95 96 Enables scope for regex variables. 97 98 Variables with names that start with ``$`` are considered global and 99 remain set throughout the file. 100 101 All other variables get undefined after each encountered ``CHECK-LABEL``. 102 103.. option:: -D<VAR=VALUE> 104 105 Sets a filecheck variable ``VAR`` with value ``VALUE`` that can be used in 106 ``CHECK:`` lines. 107 108.. option:: -version 109 110 Show the version number of this program. 111 112.. option:: -v 113 114 Print good directive pattern matches. However, if ``-input-dump=fail`` or 115 ``-input-dump=always``, add those matches as input annotations instead. 116 117.. option:: -vv 118 119 Print information helpful in diagnosing internal FileCheck issues, such as 120 discarded overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:`` matches, implicit EOF pattern matches, 121 and ``CHECK-NOT:`` patterns that do not have matches. Implies ``-v``. 122 However, if ``-input-dump=fail`` or ``-input-dump=always``, just add that 123 information as input annotations instead. 124 125.. option:: --allow-deprecated-dag-overlap 126 127 Enable overlapping among matches in a group of consecutive ``CHECK-DAG:`` 128 directives. This option is deprecated and is only provided for convenience 129 as old tests are migrated to the new non-overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:`` 130 implementation. 131 132.. option:: --color 133 134 Use colors in output (autodetected by default). 135 136EXIT STATUS 137----------- 138 139If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents, 140it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a 141non-zero value. 142 143TUTORIAL 144-------- 145 146FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN 147line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks 148like this: 149 150.. code-block:: llvm 151 152 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s 153 154This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe 155that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This 156means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output) 157against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by 158"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file 159(after the RUN line): 160 161.. code-block:: llvm 162 163 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) { 164 entry: 165 ; CHECK: sub1: 166 ; CHECK: subl 167 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v) 168 ret void 169 } 170 171 define void @inc4(i64* %p) { 172 entry: 173 ; CHECK: inc4: 174 ; CHECK: incq 175 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1) 176 ret void 177 } 178 179Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can 180see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code 181output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to 182verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify. 183 184The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that 185must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace 186differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents 187of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly. 188 189One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging 190test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above 191is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match 192unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere 193else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``" 194exists anywhere in the file. 195 196The FileCheck -check-prefix option 197~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 198 199The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test 200configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many 201circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with 202:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example: 203 204.. code-block:: llvm 205 206 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \ 207 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32 208 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \ 209 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64 210 211 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind { 212 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1 213 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1 214 ; X32: pinsrd_1: 215 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0 216 217 ; X64: pinsrd_1: 218 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0 219 } 220 221In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with 222both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation. 223 224The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive 225~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 226 227Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches 228happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In 229this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify 230this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``". 231For example, something like this works as you'd expect: 232 233.. code-block:: llvm 234 235 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) { 236 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16 237 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0 238 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3, 239 <2 x double> %tmp7, 240 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 > 241 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16 242 ret void 243 244 ; CHECK: t2: 245 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax 246 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0 247 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0 248 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax 249 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax) 250 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret 251 } 252 253"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one 254newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be 255the first directive in a file. 256 257The "CHECK-SAME:" directive 258~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 259 260Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen 261on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" 262and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom 263check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``". 264 265"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``" 266(described below). 267 268For example, the following works like you'd expect: 269 270.. code-block:: llvm 271 272 !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2) 273 274 ; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5, 275 ; CHECK-NOT: column: 276 ; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]] 277 278"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between 279it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first 280directive in a file. 281 282The "CHECK-EMPTY:" directive 283~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 284 285If you need to check that the next line has nothing on it, not even whitespace, 286you can use the "``CHECK-EMPTY:``" directive. 287 288.. code-block:: llvm 289 290 declare void @foo() 291 292 declare void @bar() 293 ; CHECK: foo 294 ; CHECK-EMPTY: 295 ; CHECK-NEXT: bar 296 297Just like "``CHECK-NEXT:``" the directive will fail if there is more than one 298newline before it finds the next blank line, and it cannot be the first 299directive in a file. 300 301The "CHECK-NOT:" directive 302~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 303 304The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur 305between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For 306example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this 307can be used: 308 309.. code-block:: llvm 310 311 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) { 312 store i32 %V, i32* %P 313 314 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8* 315 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2 316 317 %A = load i8* %P3 318 ret i8 %A 319 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0 320 ; CHECK-NOT: load 321 ; CHECK: ret i8 322 } 323 324The "CHECK-COUNT:" directive 325~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 326 327If you need to match multiple lines with the same pattern over and over again 328you can repeat a plain ``CHECK:`` as many times as needed. If that looks too 329boring you can instead use a counted check "``CHECK-COUNT-<num>:``", where 330``<num>`` is a positive decimal number. It will match the pattern exactly 331``<num>`` times, no more and no less. If you specified a custom check prefix, 332just use "``<PREFIX>-COUNT-<num>:``" for the same effect. 333Here is a simple example: 334 335.. code-block:: text 336 337 Loop at depth 1 338 Loop at depth 1 339 Loop at depth 1 340 Loop at depth 1 341 Loop at depth 2 342 Loop at depth 3 343 344 ; CHECK-COUNT-6: Loop at depth {{[0-9]+}} 345 ; CHECK-NOT: Loop at depth {{[0-9]+}} 346 347The "CHECK-DAG:" directive 348~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 349 350If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential 351order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or 352before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits 353vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks 354in the natural order: 355 356.. code-block:: c++ 357 358 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s 359 360 struct Foo { virtual void method(); }; 361 Foo f; // emit vtable 362 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo = 363 364 struct Bar { virtual void method(); }; 365 Bar b; 366 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar = 367 368``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to 369exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result, 370the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all 371occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind 372occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example, 373 374.. code-block:: llvm 375 376 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE 377 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT 378 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER 379 380This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``. 381 382With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological 383orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use. 384It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output 385sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example, 386 387.. code-block:: llvm 388 389 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2 390 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4 391 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]] 392 393In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed. 394 395If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block, 396be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use. 397 398So, for instance, the code below will pass: 399 400.. code-block:: text 401 402 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0] 403 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1] 404 vmov.32 d0[1] 405 vmov.32 d0[0] 406 407While this other code, will not: 408 409.. code-block:: text 410 411 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0] 412 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1] 413 vmov.32 d1[1] 414 vmov.32 d0[0] 415 416While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of 417register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before 418use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because 419of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask 420real bugs away. 421 422In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks. 423 424A ``CHECK-DAG:`` directive skips matches that overlap the matches of any 425preceding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block. Not only 426is this non-overlapping behavior consistent with other directives, but it's 427also necessary to handle sets of non-unique strings or patterns. For example, 428the following directives look for unordered log entries for two tasks in a 429parallel program, such as the OpenMP runtime: 430 431.. code-block:: text 432 433 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin 434 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end 435 // 436 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin 437 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end 438 439The second pair of directives is guaranteed not to match the same log entries 440as the first pair even though the patterns are identical and even if the text 441of the log entries is identical because the thread ID manages to be reused. 442 443The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive 444~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 445 446Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one 447or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a 448later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check 449flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the 450actual source of the problem. 451 452In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``" 453directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK`` 454directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line 455matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in 456``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or 457other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides 458the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently, 459preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block. 460If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, all local variables are cleared at the 461beginning of the block. 462 463For example, 464 465.. code-block:: llvm 466 467 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) { 468 entry: 469 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base: 470 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0 471 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base 472 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]] 473 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A* 474 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0) 475 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B* 476 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x) 477 ret %struct.C* %this 478 } 479 480 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) { 481 entry: 482 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base: 483 484The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three 485``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the 486``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in 487the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail, 488FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test 489failures to be detected in a single invocation. 490 491There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that 492correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must 493simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified. 494 495``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses. 496 497FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax 498~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 499 500All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match. 501For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For 502some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this, 503FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings, 504surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. FileCheck implements a POSIX 505regular expression matcher; it supports Extended POSIX regular expressions 506(ERE). Because we want to use fixed string matching for a majority of what we 507do, FileCheck has been designed to support mixing and matching fixed string 508matching with regular expressions. This allows you to write things like this: 509 510.. code-block:: llvm 511 512 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}} 513 514In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm 515register will be allowed. 516 517Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are 518visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double 519braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double 520braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like 521``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern. 522 523FileCheck Variables 524~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 525 526It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again 527later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register, 528but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this, 529:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into 530patterns. Here is a simple example: 531 532.. code-block:: llvm 533 534 ; CHECK: test5: 535 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]] 536 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]] 537 538The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the 539variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in 540``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck` 541variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can 542be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*``. If a colon follows the name, 543then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use. 544 545:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always 546get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they 547were defined on. For example: 548 549.. code-block:: llvm 550 551 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]] 552 553Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register, 554and don't care exactly which register it is. 555 556If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, variables with names that 557start with ``$`` are considered to be global. All others variables are 558local. All local variables get undefined at the beginning of each 559CHECK-LABEL block. Global variables are not affected by CHECK-LABEL. 560This makes it easier to ensure that individual tests are not affected 561by variables set in preceding tests. 562 563FileCheck Expressions 564~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 565 566Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the 567match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain 568fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute 569line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers 570change due to text addition or deletion. 571 572To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``, 573``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These 574expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an 575optional integer offset). 576 577This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include 578relative line number references, for example: 579 580.. code-block:: c++ 581 582 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator 583 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}} 584 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}} 585 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}} 586 int a 587 588Matching Newline Characters 589~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 590 591To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class 592``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern: 593 594.. code-block:: c++ 595 596 // CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd" 597 598matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump): 599 600.. code-block:: text 601 602 DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000233) 603 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd") 604 605letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value 606``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``". 607