1====================== 2Control Flow Integrity 3====================== 4 5.. toctree:: 6 :hidden: 7 8 ControlFlowIntegrityDesign 9 10.. contents:: 11 :local: 12 13Introduction 14============ 15 16Clang includes an implementation of a number of control flow integrity (CFI) 17schemes, which are designed to abort the program upon detecting certain forms 18of undefined behavior that can potentially allow attackers to subvert the 19program's control flow. These schemes have been optimized for performance, 20allowing developers to enable them in release builds. 21 22To enable Clang's available CFI schemes, use the flag ``-fsanitize=cfi``. 23You can also enable a subset of available :ref:`schemes <cfi-schemes>`. 24As currently implemented, all schemes rely on link-time optimization (LTO); 25so it is required to specify ``-flto``, and the linker used must support LTO, 26for example via the `gold plugin`_. 27 28To allow the checks to be implemented efficiently, the program must 29be structured such that certain object files are compiled with CFI 30enabled, and are statically linked into the program. This may preclude 31the use of shared libraries in some cases. 32 33The compiler will only produce CFI checks for a class if it can infer hidden 34LTO visibility for that class. LTO visibility is a property of a class that 35is inferred from flags and attributes. For more details, see the documentation 36for :doc:`LTO visibility <LTOVisibility>`. 37 38The ``-fsanitize=cfi-{vcall,nvcall,derived-cast,unrelated-cast}`` flags 39require that a ``-fvisibility=`` flag also be specified. This is because the 40default visibility setting is ``-fvisibility=default``, which would disable 41CFI checks for classes without visibility attributes. Most users will want 42to specify ``-fvisibility=hidden``, which enables CFI checks for such classes. 43 44Experimental support for :ref:`cross-DSO control flow integrity 45<cfi-cross-dso>` exists that does not require classes to have hidden LTO 46visibility. This cross-DSO support has unstable ABI at this time. 47 48.. _gold plugin: http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html 49 50.. _cfi-schemes: 51 52Available schemes 53================= 54 55Available schemes are: 56 57 - ``-fsanitize=cfi-cast-strict``: Enables :ref:`strict cast checks 58 <cfi-strictness>`. 59 - ``-fsanitize=cfi-derived-cast``: Base-to-derived cast to the wrong 60 dynamic type. 61 - ``-fsanitize=cfi-unrelated-cast``: Cast from ``void*`` or another 62 unrelated type to the wrong dynamic type. 63 - ``-fsanitize=cfi-nvcall``: Non-virtual call via an object whose vptr is of 64 the wrong dynamic type. 65 - ``-fsanitize=cfi-vcall``: Virtual call via an object whose vptr is of the 66 wrong dynamic type. 67 - ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``: Indirect call of a function with wrong dynamic 68 type. 69 70You can use ``-fsanitize=cfi`` to enable all the schemes and use 71``-fno-sanitize`` flag to narrow down the set of schemes as desired. 72For example, you can build your program with 73``-fsanitize=cfi -fno-sanitize=cfi-nvcall,cfi-icall`` 74to use all schemes except for non-virtual member function call and indirect call 75checking. 76 77Remember that you have to provide ``-flto`` if at least one CFI scheme is 78enabled. 79 80Trapping and Diagnostics 81======================== 82 83By default, CFI will abort the program immediately upon detecting a control 84flow integrity violation. You can use the :ref:`-fno-sanitize-trap= 85<controlling-code-generation>` flag to cause CFI to print a diagnostic 86similar to the one below before the program aborts. 87 88.. code-block:: console 89 90 bad-cast.cpp:109:7: runtime error: control flow integrity check for type 'B' failed during base-to-derived cast (vtable address 0x000000425a50) 91 0x000000425a50: note: vtable is of type 'A' 92 00 00 00 00 f0 f1 41 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 5a 42 00 93 ^ 94 95If diagnostics are enabled, you can also configure CFI to continue program 96execution instead of aborting by using the :ref:`-fsanitize-recover= 97<controlling-code-generation>` flag. 98 99Forward-Edge CFI for Virtual Calls 100================================== 101 102This scheme checks that virtual calls take place using a vptr of the correct 103dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the called object must be a 104derived class of the static type of the object used to make the call. 105This CFI scheme can be enabled on its own using ``-fsanitize=cfi-vcall``. 106 107For this scheme to work, all translation units containing the definition 108of a virtual member function (whether inline or not), other than members 109of :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` types or types with public :doc:`LTO 110visibility <LTOVisibility>`, must be compiled with ``-flto`` or ``-flto=thin`` 111enabled and be statically linked into the program. 112 113Performance 114----------- 115 116A performance overhead of less than 1% has been measured by running the 117Dromaeo benchmark suite against an instrumented version of the Chromium 118web browser. Another good performance benchmark for this mechanism is the 119virtual-call-heavy SPEC 2006 xalancbmk. 120 121Note that this scheme has not yet been optimized for binary size; an increase 122of up to 15% has been observed for Chromium. 123 124Bad Cast Checking 125================= 126 127This scheme checks that pointer casts are made to an object of the correct 128dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the object must be a derived class 129of the pointee type of the cast. The checks are currently only introduced 130where the class being casted to is a polymorphic class. 131 132Bad casts are not in themselves control flow integrity violations, but they 133can also create security vulnerabilities, and the implementation uses many 134of the same mechanisms. 135 136There are two types of bad cast that may be forbidden: bad casts 137from a base class to a derived class (which can be checked with 138``-fsanitize=cfi-derived-cast``), and bad casts from a pointer of 139type ``void*`` or another unrelated type (which can be checked with 140``-fsanitize=cfi-unrelated-cast``). 141 142The difference between these two types of casts is that the first is defined 143by the C++ standard to produce an undefined value, while the second is not 144in itself undefined behavior (it is well defined to cast the pointer back 145to its original type) unless the object is uninitialized and the cast is a 146``static_cast`` (see C++14 [basic.life]p5). 147 148If a program as a matter of policy forbids the second type of cast, that 149restriction can normally be enforced. However it may in some cases be necessary 150for a function to perform a forbidden cast to conform with an external API 151(e.g. the ``allocate`` member function of a standard library allocator). Such 152functions may be :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>`. 153 154For this scheme to work, all translation units containing the definition 155of a virtual member function (whether inline or not), other than members 156of :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` types or types with public :doc:`LTO 157visibility <LTOVisibility>`, must be compiled with ``-flto`` or ``-flto=thin`` 158enabled and be statically linked into the program. 159 160Non-Virtual Member Function Call Checking 161========================================= 162 163This scheme checks that non-virtual calls take place using an object of 164the correct dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the called object 165must be a derived class of the static type of the object used to make the 166call. The checks are currently only introduced where the object is of a 167polymorphic class type. This CFI scheme can be enabled on its own using 168``-fsanitize=cfi-nvcall``. 169 170For this scheme to work, all translation units containing the definition 171of a virtual member function (whether inline or not), other than members 172of :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` types or types with public :doc:`LTO 173visibility <LTOVisibility>`, must be compiled with ``-flto`` or ``-flto=thin`` 174enabled and be statically linked into the program. 175 176.. _cfi-strictness: 177 178Strictness 179---------- 180 181If a class has a single non-virtual base and does not introduce or override 182virtual member functions or fields other than an implicitly defined virtual 183destructor, it will have the same layout and virtual function semantics as 184its base. By default, casts to such classes are checked as if they were made 185to the least derived such class. 186 187Casting an instance of a base class to such a derived class is technically 188undefined behavior, but it is a relatively common hack for introducing 189member functions on class instances with specific properties that works under 190most compilers and should not have security implications, so we allow it by 191default. It can be disabled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-cast-strict``. 192 193Indirect Function Call Checking 194=============================== 195 196This scheme checks that function calls take place using a function of the 197correct dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the function must match 198the static type used at the call. This CFI scheme can be enabled on its own 199using ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``. 200 201For this scheme to work, each indirect function call in the program, other 202than calls in :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` functions, must call a 203function which was either compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` enabled, 204or whose address was taken by a function in a translation unit compiled with 205``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``. 206 207If a function in a translation unit compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` 208takes the address of a function not compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``, 209that address may differ from the address taken by a function in a translation 210unit not compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``. This is technically a 211violation of the C and C++ standards, but it should not affect most programs. 212 213Each translation unit compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` must be 214statically linked into the program or shared library, and calls across 215shared library boundaries are handled as if the callee was not compiled with 216``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``. 217 218This scheme is currently only supported on the x86 and x86_64 architectures. 219 220``-fsanitize-cfi-icall-generalize-pointers`` 221-------------------------------------------- 222 223Mismatched pointer types are a common cause of cfi-icall check failures. 224Translation units compiled with the ``-fsanitize-cfi-icall-generalize-pointers`` 225flag relax pointer type checking for call sites in that translation unit, 226applied across all functions compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``. 227 228Specifically, pointers in return and argument types are treated as equivalent as 229long as the qualifiers for the type they point to match. For example, ``char*``, 230``char**``, and ``int*`` are considered equivalent types. However, ``char*`` and 231``const char*`` are considered separate types. 232 233``-fsanitize-cfi-icall-generalize-pointers`` is not compatible with 234``-fsanitize-cfi-cross-dso``. 235 236 237``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` and ``-fsanitize=function`` 238---------------------------------------------------- 239 240This tool is similar to ``-fsanitize=function`` in that both tools check 241the types of function calls. However, the two tools occupy different points 242on the design space; ``-fsanitize=function`` is a developer tool designed 243to find bugs in local development builds, whereas ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` 244is a security hardening mechanism designed to be deployed in release builds. 245 246``-fsanitize=function`` has a higher space and time overhead due to a more 247complex type check at indirect call sites, as well as a need for run-time 248type information (RTTI), which may make it unsuitable for deployment. Because 249of the need for RTTI, ``-fsanitize=function`` can only be used with C++ 250programs, whereas ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` can protect both C and C++ programs. 251 252On the other hand, ``-fsanitize=function`` conforms more closely with the C++ 253standard and user expectations around interaction with shared libraries; 254the identity of function pointers is maintained, and calls across shared 255library boundaries are no different from calls within a single program or 256shared library. 257 258.. _cfi-blacklist: 259 260Blacklist 261========= 262 263A :doc:`SanitizerSpecialCaseList` can be used to relax CFI checks for certain 264source files, functions and types using the ``src``, ``fun`` and ``type`` 265entity types. Specific CFI modes can be be specified using ``[section]`` 266headers. 267 268.. code-block:: bash 269 270 # Suppress all CFI checking for code in a file. 271 src:bad_file.cpp 272 src:bad_header.h 273 # Ignore all functions with names containing MyFooBar. 274 fun:*MyFooBar* 275 # Ignore all types in the standard library. 276 type:std::* 277 # Disable only unrelated cast checks for this function 278 [cfi-unrelated-cast] 279 fun:*UnrelatedCast* 280 # Disable CFI call checks for this function without affecting cast checks 281 [cfi-vcall|cfi-nvcall|cfi-icall] 282 fun:*BadCall* 283 284 285.. _cfi-cross-dso: 286 287Shared library support 288====================== 289 290Use **-f[no-]sanitize-cfi-cross-dso** to enable the cross-DSO control 291flow integrity mode, which allows all CFI schemes listed above to 292apply across DSO boundaries. As in the regular CFI, each DSO must be 293built with ``-flto``. 294 295Normally, CFI checks will only be performed for classes that have hidden LTO 296visibility. With this flag enabled, the compiler will emit cross-DSO CFI 297checks for all classes, except for those which appear in the CFI blacklist 298or which use a ``no_sanitize`` attribute. 299 300Design 301====== 302 303Please refer to the :doc:`design document<ControlFlowIntegrityDesign>`. 304 305Publications 306============ 307 308`Control-Flow Integrity: Principles, Implementations, and Applications <http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/64250/ccs05.pdf>`_. 309Martin Abadi, Mihai Budiu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jay Ligatti. 310 311`Enforcing Forward-Edge Control-Flow Integrity in GCC & LLVM <http://www.pcc.me.uk/~peter/acad/usenix14.pdf>`_. 312Caroline Tice, Tom Roeder, Peter Collingbourne, Stephen Checkoway, 313Úlfar Erlingsson, Luis Lozano, Geoff Pike. 314