1====================== 2Control Flow Integrity 3====================== 4 5.. toctree:: 6 :hidden: 7 8 ControlFlowIntegrityDesign 9 10.. contents:: 11 :local: 12 13Introduction 14============ 15 16Clang includes an implementation of a number of control flow integrity (CFI) 17schemes, which are designed to abort the program upon detecting certain forms 18of undefined behavior that can potentially allow attackers to subvert the 19program's control flow. These schemes have been optimized for performance, 20allowing developers to enable them in release builds. 21 22To enable Clang's available CFI schemes, use the flag ``-fsanitize=cfi``. 23As currently implemented, all of Clang's CFI schemes (``cfi-vcall``, 24``cfi-derived-cast``, ``cfi-unrelated-cast``, ``cfi-nvcall``, ``cfi-icall``) 25rely on link-time optimization (LTO); so it is required to specify 26``-flto``, and the linker used must support LTO, for example via the `gold 27plugin`_. To allow the checks to be implemented efficiently, the program must 28be structured such that certain object files are compiled with CFI enabled, 29and are statically linked into the program. This may preclude the use of 30shared libraries in some cases. 31 32Clang currently implements forward-edge CFI for member function calls and 33bad cast checking. More schemes are under development. 34 35.. _gold plugin: http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html 36 37Forward-Edge CFI for Virtual Calls 38---------------------------------- 39 40This scheme checks that virtual calls take place using a vptr of the correct 41dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the called object must be a 42derived class of the static type of the object used to make the call. 43This CFI scheme can be enabled on its own using ``-fsanitize=cfi-vcall``. 44 45For this scheme to work, all translation units containing the definition 46of a virtual member function (whether inline or not), other than members 47of :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` types, must be compiled with 48``-fsanitize=cfi-vcall`` enabled and be statically linked into the program. 49 50Performance 51~~~~~~~~~~~ 52 53A performance overhead of less than 1% has been measured by running the 54Dromaeo benchmark suite against an instrumented version of the Chromium 55web browser. Another good performance benchmark for this mechanism is the 56virtual-call-heavy SPEC 2006 xalancbmk. 57 58Note that this scheme has not yet been optimized for binary size; an increase 59of up to 15% has been observed for Chromium. 60 61Bad Cast Checking 62----------------- 63 64This scheme checks that pointer casts are made to an object of the correct 65dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the object must be a derived class 66of the pointee type of the cast. The checks are currently only introduced 67where the class being casted to is a polymorphic class. 68 69Bad casts are not in themselves control flow integrity violations, but they 70can also create security vulnerabilities, and the implementation uses many 71of the same mechanisms. 72 73There are two types of bad cast that may be forbidden: bad casts 74from a base class to a derived class (which can be checked with 75``-fsanitize=cfi-derived-cast``), and bad casts from a pointer of 76type ``void*`` or another unrelated type (which can be checked with 77``-fsanitize=cfi-unrelated-cast``). 78 79The difference between these two types of casts is that the first is defined 80by the C++ standard to produce an undefined value, while the second is not 81in itself undefined behavior (it is well defined to cast the pointer back 82to its original type). 83 84If a program as a matter of policy forbids the second type of cast, that 85restriction can normally be enforced. However it may in some cases be necessary 86for a function to perform a forbidden cast to conform with an external API 87(e.g. the ``allocate`` member function of a standard library allocator). Such 88functions may be :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>`. 89 90For this scheme to work, all translation units containing the definition 91of a virtual member function (whether inline or not), other than members 92of :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` types, must be compiled with 93``-fsanitize=cfi-derived-cast`` or ``-fsanitize=cfi-unrelated-cast`` enabled 94and be statically linked into the program. 95 96Non-Virtual Member Function Call Checking 97----------------------------------------- 98 99This scheme checks that non-virtual calls take place using an object of 100the correct dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the called object 101must be a derived class of the static type of the object used to make the 102call. The checks are currently only introduced where the object is of a 103polymorphic class type. This CFI scheme can be enabled on its own using 104``-fsanitize=cfi-nvcall``. 105 106For this scheme to work, all translation units containing the definition 107of a virtual member function (whether inline or not), other than members 108of :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` types, must be compiled with 109``-fsanitize=cfi-nvcall`` enabled and be statically linked into the program. 110 111.. _cfi-strictness: 112 113Strictness 114~~~~~~~~~~ 115 116If a class has a single non-virtual base and does not introduce or override 117virtual member functions or fields other than an implicitly defined virtual 118destructor, it will have the same layout and virtual function semantics as 119its base. By default, casts to such classes are checked as if they were made 120to the least derived such class. 121 122Casting an instance of a base class to such a derived class is technically 123undefined behavior, but it is a relatively common hack for introducing 124member functions on class instances with specific properties that works under 125most compilers and should not have security implications, so we allow it by 126default. It can be disabled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-cast-strict``. 127 128Indirect Function Call Checking 129------------------------------- 130 131This scheme checks that function calls take place using a function of the 132correct dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the function must match 133the static type used at the call. This CFI scheme can be enabled on its own 134using ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``. 135 136For this scheme to work, each indirect function call in the program, other 137than calls in :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` functions, must call a 138function which was either compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` enabled, 139or whose address was taken by a function in a translation unit compiled with 140``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``. 141 142If a function in a translation unit compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` 143takes the address of a function not compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``, 144that address may differ from the address taken by a function in a translation 145unit not compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``. This is technically a 146violation of the C and C++ standards, but it should not affect most programs. 147 148Each translation unit compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` must be 149statically linked into the program or shared library, and calls across 150shared library boundaries are handled as if the callee was not compiled with 151``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``. 152 153This scheme is currently only supported on the x86 and x86_64 architectures. 154 155``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` and ``-fsanitize=function`` 156~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 157 158This tool is similar to ``-fsanitize=function`` in that both tools check 159the types of function calls. However, the two tools occupy different points 160on the design space; ``-fsanitize=function`` is a developer tool designed 161to find bugs in local development builds, whereas ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` 162is a security hardening mechanism designed to be deployed in release builds. 163 164``-fsanitize=function`` has a higher space and time overhead due to a more 165complex type check at indirect call sites, as well as a need for run-time 166type information (RTTI), which may make it unsuitable for deployment. Because 167of the need for RTTI, ``-fsanitize=function`` can only be used with C++ 168programs, whereas ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` can protect both C and C++ programs. 169 170On the other hand, ``-fsanitize=function`` conforms more closely with the C++ 171standard and user expectations around interaction with shared libraries; 172the identity of function pointers is maintained, and calls across shared 173library boundaries are no different from calls within a single program or 174shared library. 175 176.. _cfi-blacklist: 177 178Blacklist 179--------- 180 181A :doc:`SanitizerSpecialCaseList` can be used to relax CFI checks for certain 182source files, functions and types using the ``src``, ``fun`` and ``type`` 183entity types. 184 185In addition, if a type has a ``uuid`` attribute and the blacklist contains 186the type entry ``attr:uuid``, CFI checks are suppressed for that type. This 187allows all COM types to be easily blacklisted, which is useful as COM types 188are typically defined outside of the linked program. 189 190.. code-block:: bash 191 192 # Suppress checking for code in a file. 193 src:bad_file.cpp 194 src:bad_header.h 195 # Ignore all functions with names containing MyFooBar. 196 fun:*MyFooBar* 197 # Ignore all types in the standard library. 198 type:std::* 199 # Ignore all types with a uuid attribute. 200 type:attr:uuid 201 202Design 203------ 204 205Please refer to the :doc:`design document<ControlFlowIntegrityDesign>`. 206 207Publications 208------------ 209 210`Control-Flow Integrity: Principles, Implementations, and Applications <http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/64250/ccs05.pdf>`_. 211Martin Abadi, Mihai Budiu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jay Ligatti. 212 213`Enforcing Forward-Edge Control-Flow Integrity in GCC & LLVM <http://www.pcc.me.uk/~peter/acad/usenix14.pdf>`_. 214Caroline Tice, Tom Roeder, Peter Collingbourne, Stephen Checkoway, 215Úlfar Erlingsson, Luis Lozano, Geoff Pike. 216