1 //===--- ImplicitConversionInLoopCheck.cpp - clang-tidy--------------------===// 2 // 3 // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. 4 // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. 5 // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception 6 // 7 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// 8 9 #include "ImplicitConversionInLoopCheck.h" 10 11 #include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h" 12 #include "clang/AST/Decl.h" 13 #include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h" 14 #include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h" 15 #include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h" 16 17 using namespace clang::ast_matchers; 18 19 namespace clang { 20 namespace tidy { 21 namespace performance { 22 23 // Checks if the stmt is a ImplicitCastExpr with a CastKind that is not a NoOp. 24 // The subtlety is that in some cases (user defined conversions), we can 25 // get to ImplicitCastExpr inside each other, with the outer one a NoOp. In this 26 // case we skip the first cast expr. 27 static bool isNonTrivialImplicitCast(const Stmt *ST) { 28 if (const auto *ICE = dyn_cast<ImplicitCastExpr>(ST)) { 29 return (ICE->getCastKind() != CK_NoOp) || 30 isNonTrivialImplicitCast(ICE->getSubExpr()); 31 } 32 return false; 33 } 34 35 void ImplicitConversionInLoopCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) { 36 // We look for const ref loop variables that (optionally inside an 37 // ExprWithCleanup) materialize a temporary, and contain a implicit 38 // conversion. The check on the implicit conversion is done in check() because 39 // we can't access implicit conversion subnode via matchers: has() skips casts 40 // and materialize! We also bind on the call to operator* to get the proper 41 // type in the diagnostic message. We use both cxxOperatorCallExpr for user 42 // defined operator and unaryOperator when the iterator is a pointer, like 43 // for arrays or std::array. 44 // 45 // Note that when the implicit conversion is done through a user defined 46 // conversion operator, the node is a CXXMemberCallExpr, not a 47 // CXXOperatorCallExpr, so it should not get caught by the 48 // cxxOperatorCallExpr() matcher. 49 Finder->addMatcher( 50 traverse( 51 TK_AsIs, 52 cxxForRangeStmt(hasLoopVariable( 53 varDecl( 54 hasType(qualType(references(qualType(isConstQualified())))), 55 hasInitializer( 56 expr(anyOf( 57 hasDescendant( 58 cxxOperatorCallExpr().bind("operator-call")), 59 hasDescendant(unaryOperator(hasOperatorName("*")) 60 .bind("operator-call")))) 61 .bind("init"))) 62 .bind("faulty-var")))), 63 this); 64 } 65 66 void ImplicitConversionInLoopCheck::check( 67 const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) { 68 const auto *VD = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<VarDecl>("faulty-var"); 69 const auto *Init = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Expr>("init"); 70 const auto *OperatorCall = 71 Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Expr>("operator-call"); 72 73 if (const auto *Cleanup = dyn_cast<ExprWithCleanups>(Init)) 74 Init = Cleanup->getSubExpr(); 75 76 const auto *Materialized = dyn_cast<MaterializeTemporaryExpr>(Init); 77 if (!Materialized) 78 return; 79 80 // We ignore NoOp casts. Those are generated if the * operator on the 81 // iterator returns a value instead of a reference, and the loop variable 82 // is a reference. This situation is fine (it probably produces the same 83 // code at the end). 84 if (isNonTrivialImplicitCast(Materialized->getSubExpr())) 85 reportAndFix(Result.Context, VD, OperatorCall); 86 } 87 88 void ImplicitConversionInLoopCheck::reportAndFix(const ASTContext *Context, 89 const VarDecl *VD, 90 const Expr *OperatorCall) { 91 // We only match on const ref, so we should print a const ref version of the 92 // type. 93 QualType ConstType = OperatorCall->getType().withConst(); 94 QualType ConstRefType = Context->getLValueReferenceType(ConstType); 95 const char Message[] = 96 "the type of the loop variable %0 is different from the one returned " 97 "by the iterator and generates an implicit conversion; you can either " 98 "change the type to the matching one (%1 but 'const auto&' is always a " 99 "valid option) or remove the reference to make it explicit that you are " 100 "creating a new value"; 101 diag(VD->getBeginLoc(), Message) << VD << ConstRefType; 102 } 103 104 } // namespace performance 105 } // namespace tidy 106 } // namespace clang 107