Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched refs:stat1 (Results 1 – 8 of 8) sorted by relevance

/sqlite-3.40.0/ext/expert/
H A Dexpert1.test434 CREATE INDEX t1_idx_00000062 ON t1(b); -- stat1: 100 20
435 CREATE INDEX t1_idx_00000061 ON t1(a); -- stat1: 100 50
436 CREATE INDEX t2_idx_00000063 ON t2(c); -- stat1: 100 20
437 CREATE INDEX t2_idx_00000064 ON t2(d); -- stat1: 100 5
443 CREATE INDEX t1_idx_000123a7 ON t1(a, b); -- stat1: 100 50 17
444 CREATE INDEX t2_idx_0001295b ON t2(c, d); -- stat1: 100 20 5
448 CREATE INDEX t1_idx_00000061 ON t1(a); -- stat1: 100 50
449 CREATE INDEX t1_idx_00000062 ON t1(b); -- stat1: 100 20
452 CREATE INDEX t2_idx_00000063 ON t2(c); -- stat1: 100 20
453 CREATE INDEX t2_idx_00000064 ON t2(d); -- stat1: 100 5
[all …]
/sqlite-3.40.0/test/
H A DanalyzeD.test74 # Without stat1, because 3001 is larger than all samples in the stat4
76 # chooses it over the c=150 index (5 rows). Even with stat1 data, things
102 # gets this right, even without stat1 data.
H A Dautoanalyze1.test52 # No use of stat1 recorded so far
H A Danalyze4.test59 # that the number of rows selected in stat1 is half the total
H A Dskipscan2.test74 -- of a skip-scan. So make a manual adjustment to the stat1 table
H A Dindex7.test343 # Incomplete stat1 information on a table with few rows should still use the
H A Danalyze3.test726 # At one point duplicate stat1 entries were causing a memory leak.
/sqlite-3.40.0/ext/session/
H A Dsqlite3session.c1308 SessionStat1Ctx stat1 = {{0,0,0,0,0},0}; in sessionPreupdateOneChange() local
1329 stat1.hook = pSession->hook; in sessionPreupdateOneChange()
1330 stat1.pSession = pSession; in sessionPreupdateOneChange()
1331 pSession->hook.pCtx = (void*)&stat1; in sessionPreupdateOneChange()
1442 pSession->hook = stat1.hook; in sessionPreupdateOneChange()