Searched refs:num_core_efficiencies (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
429 hw_thread.attrs.core_eff >= num_core_efficiencies) { in _gather_enumeration_information()432 num_core_efficiencies = hw_thread.attrs.core_eff + 1; in _gather_enumeration_information()585 retval->num_core_efficiencies = 0; in allocate()646 printf("* num_core_eff: %d\n", num_core_efficiencies); in dump()757 KMP_ASSERT(num_core_efficiencies <= KMP_HW_MAX_NUM_CORE_EFFS) in print()758 for (int eff = 0; eff < num_core_efficiencies; ++eff) { in print()1046 if (core_eff < 0 || core_eff >= num_core_efficiencies) { in filter_hw_subset()1052 KMP_HNT(ValidValuesRange, 0, num_core_efficiencies - 1), in filter_hw_subset()
705 int num_core_efficiencies; variable