en Copyright 2015 Java http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/wasmtime-44.0.1/tests/misc_testsuite/memory64/codegen.wast#e50d897b Add `bulk_memory` to wast configuration (#12883)Allows enabling/disabling this wasm proposal on a per-test basis. List of files: /wasmtime-44.0.1/tests/misc_testsuite/memory64/codegen.wast Mon, 30 Mar 2026 12:44:15 +0000 Alex Crichton <alex@alexcrichton.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/wasmtime-44.0.1/tests/misc_testsuite/memory64/codegen.wast#60fc557c Refactor how wasm features are calculated for `*.wast` tests (#9560)* Refactor how wasm features are calculated for `*.wast` testsThis commit refactors the `tests/wast.rs` test suite which runs all ofthe upstream spec tests as `*.wast` files as well as our own`misc_testsuite` which has its own suite of `*.wast` files. Previouslythe set of wasm features active for each test was a sort of randommishmash and convoluted set of conditionals which was updated and editedover time as upstream proposal test suites evolved. This was thenmirrored into our own conventions for `misc_testsuite` as well. Overallthough this has a number of downsides I'm trying to fix here:* The calculation of what features are enabled is quite complicated and effectively a random mishmash of `||` conditionals with hierarchies that don't make any sense beyond "this is just required to get things to pass".* There is no means of per-test configuration. For example `canonicalize-nans.wast` had hardcoded logic in `tests/wast.rs` that it needed a different setting turned on in `Config`.* There was no easy means to write tests for Wasmtime which take a union of a number of proposals together without having lots of sub-folders that may not make sense.* Tests that require a particular proposal had to have duplicate logic for Winch as it doesn't support the full suite of features of all proposals that Cranelift does.The new system implemented in this commit takes a leaf out of the`disas` tests. There is a new `TestConfig` structure in the`tests/wast.rs` harness which is decoded from each test (leading `;;!`comments) which enables specifying, in each test, what's required. Thisencompasses many wasm proposals but additionally captures other behaviorlike nan-canonicalization. This means that all test files in`misc_testsuite/**/*.wast` are now manually annotated with what wasmfeatures they require and what's needed to run. This makes per-testconfiguration much easier, per-config-setting much easier, and blanketignore-by-proposal for Winch much easier as well.For spec tests we can't modify the contents of the upstream `*.wast`files. To handle this they're handled specially where `TestConfig` ismanually created and manipulated for each spec proposal and the maintest suite itself. This enables per-proposal configuration that doesn'tleak into any others and makes it more obvious what proposals are doingwhat.* Hack around Winch support for aarch64 List of files: /wasmtime-44.0.1/tests/misc_testsuite/memory64/codegen.wast Tue, 05 Nov 2024 21:26:25 +0000 Alex Crichton <alex@alexcrichton.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/wasmtime-44.0.1/tests/misc_testsuite/memory64/codegen.wast#e68aa995 Implement the memory64 proposal in Wasmtime (#3153)* Implement the memory64 proposal in Wasmtime This commit implements the WebAssembly [memory64 proposal][proposal] in both Wasmtime and Cranelift. In terms of work done Cranelift ended up needing very little work here since most of it was already prepared for 64-bit memories at one point or another. Most of the work in Wasmtime is largely refactoring, changing a bunch of `u32` values to something else. A number of internal and public interfaces are changing as a result of this commit, for example: * Acessors on `wasmtime::Memory` that work with pages now all return `u64` unconditionally rather than `u32`. This makes it possible to accommodate 64-bit memories with this API, but we may also want to consider `usize` here at some point since the host can't grow past `usize`-limited pages anyway. * The `wasmtime::Limits` structure is removed in favor of minimum/maximum methods on table/memory types. * Many libcall intrinsics called by jit code now unconditionally take `u64` arguments instead of `u32`. Return values are `usize`, however, since the return value, if successful, is always bounded by host memory while arguments can come from any guest. * The `heap_addr` clif instruction now takes a 64-bit offset argument instead of a 32-bit one. It turns out that the legalization of `heap_addr` already worked with 64-bit offsets, so this change was fairly trivial to make. * The runtime implementation of mmap-based linear memories has changed to largely work in `usize` quantities in its API and in bytes instead of pages. This simplifies various aspects and reflects that mmap-memories are always bound by `usize` since that's what the host is using to address things, and additionally most calculations care about bytes rather than pages except for the very edge where we're going to/from wasm. Overall I've tried to minimize the amount of `as` casts as possible, using checked `try_from` and checked arithemtic with either error handling or explicit `unwrap()` calls to tell us about bugs in the future. Most locations have relatively obvious things to do with various implications on various hosts, and I think they should all be roughly of the right shape but time will tell. I mostly relied on the compiler complaining that various types weren't aligned to figure out type-casting, and I manually audited some of the more obvious locations. I suspect we have a number of hidden locations that will panic on 32-bit hosts if 64-bit modules try to run there, but otherwise I think we should be generally ok (famous last words). In any case I wouldn't want to enable this by default naturally until we've fuzzed it for some time. In terms of the actual underlying implementation, no one should expect memory64 to be all that fast. Right now it's implemented with "dynamic" heaps which have a few consequences: * All memory accesses are bounds-checked. I'm not sure how aggressively Cranelift tries to optimize out bounds checks, but I suspect not a ton since we haven't stressed this much historically. * Heaps are always precisely sized. This means that every call to `memory.grow` will incur a `memcpy` of memory from the old heap to the new. We probably want to at least look into `mremap` on Linux and otherwise try to implement schemes where dynamic heaps have some reserved pages to grow into to help amortize the cost of `memory.grow`. The memory64 spec test suite is scheduled to now run on CI, but as with all the other spec test suites it's really not all that comprehensive. I've tried adding more tests for basic things as I've had to implement guards for them, but I wouldn't really consider the testing adequate from just this PR itself. I did try to take care in one test to actually allocate a 4gb+ heap and then avoid running that in the pooling allocator or in emulation because otherwise that may fail or take excessively long. [proposal]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/memory64/blob/master/proposals/memory64/Overview.md * Fix some tests * More test fixes * Fix wasmtime tests * Fix doctests * Revert to 32-bit immediate offsets in `heap_addr` This commit updates the generation of addresses in wasm code to always use 32-bit offsets for `heap_addr`, and if the calculated offset is bigger than 32-bits we emit a manual add with an overflow check. * Disable memory64 for spectest fuzzing * Fix wrong offset being added to heap addr * More comments! * Clarify bytes/pages List of files: /wasmtime-44.0.1/tests/misc_testsuite/memory64/codegen.wast Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:40:20 +0000 Alex Crichton <alex@alexcrichton.com>