<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp</title>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2015</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator><item>
        <title>2946cd70 - Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/unittests/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp#2946cd70</link>
        <description>Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoto reflect the new license.We understand that people may be surprised that we&apos;re moving the headerentirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with theFoundation&apos;s lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVMproject under our new license, so you will see that the license headersinclude that license only. Some of our contributors have contributedcode under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy ofour old license notice in the top-level files in each project andrepository.llvm-svn: 351636

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/unittests/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2019 08:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Chandler Carruth &lt;chandlerc@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>9a67b073 - Re-sort #include lines for unittests. This uses a slightly modified</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/unittests/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp#9a67b073</link>
        <description>Re-sort #include lines for unittests. This uses a slightly modifiedclang-format (https://reviews.llvm.org/D33932) to keep primary headersat the top and handle new utility headers like &apos;gmock&apos; consistently withother utility headers.No other change was made. I did no manual edits, all of this isclang-format.This should allow other changes to have more clear and focused diffs,and is especially motivated by moving some headers into more focusedlibraries.llvm-svn: 304786

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/unittests/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 11:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Chandler Carruth &lt;chandlerc@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>a4bd1463 - Retry: [BPI] Use a safer constructor to calculate branch probabilities</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/unittests/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp#a4bd1463</link>
        <description>Retry: [BPI] Use a safer constructor to calculate branch probabilitiesBPI may trigger signed overflow UB while computing branch probabilities forcold calls or to unreachables. For example, with our current choice of weights,we&apos;ll crash if there are &gt;= 2^12 branches to an unreachable.Use a safer BranchProbability constructor which is better at handling fractionswith large denominators.Changes since the initial commit:  - Use explicit casts to ensure that multiplication operands are 64-bit    ints.rdar://problem/29368161Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27862llvm-svn: 290022

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/unittests/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 01:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Vedant Kumar &lt;vsk@apple.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>9529643e - [BPI] Use a safer constructor to calculate branch probabilities</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/unittests/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp#9529643e</link>
        <description>[BPI] Use a safer constructor to calculate branch probabilitiesBPI may trigger signed overflow UB while computing branch probabilitiesfor cold calls or to unreachables. For example, with our current choiceof weights, we&apos;ll crash if there are &gt;= 2^12 branches to an unreachable.Use a safer BranchProbability constructor which is better at handlingfractions with large denominators.rdar://problem/29368161Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27862llvm-svn: 290016

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/unittests/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 00:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Vedant Kumar &lt;vsk@apple.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
