<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in sometimes_deleted_function.ll.expected</title>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2015</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator><item>
        <title>40760060 - [test] Use -passes in lit tests for the UpdateTestChecks tool</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/sometimes_deleted_function.ll.expected#40760060</link>
        <description>[test] Use -passes in lit tests for the UpdateTestChecks toolThe UpdateTestChecks tool itself does not care about which passmanager that is used in the opt invocation. So the lit tests thatare verifying the behavior of the UpdateTestChecks tool is updatedto use the new-PM syntax (-passes=) when specifying the pass pipelinein the test cases that are used for verifying the UpdateTestCheckstool.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114517

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/sometimes_deleted_function.ll.expected</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Bjorn Pettersson &lt;bjorn.a.pettersson@ericsson.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>a8b2fed0 - [Utils][FIX] Properly deal with occasionally deleted functions</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/sometimes_deleted_function.ll.expected#a8b2fed0</link>
        <description>[Utils][FIX] Properly deal with occasionally deleted functionsWhile D68850 allowed functions to be deleted I accidentally saved someversion of the function to be used once a suitable prefix was found.This turned out to be problematic when the occasionally deleted functionis also occasionally modified. The test case is adjusted to resemble thecase in which the problem was found.Reviewed By: lebedev.riDifferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76586

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/sometimes_deleted_function.ll.expected</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 02:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Johannes Doerfert &lt;johannes@jdoerfert.de&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>a6c59e07 - [Utils] Deal with occasionally deleted functions</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/sometimes_deleted_function.ll.expected#a6c59e07</link>
        <description>[Utils] Deal with occasionally deleted functionsWhen functions exist for some but not all run lines we need to becareful when selecting the prefix. So far, a common prefix waspotentially chosen as there was never a &quot;conflict&quot; that would havecaused otherwise. With this patch we avoid common prefixes if theyare used by run lines that do not emit the function.Reviewed By: lebedev.riDifferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68850

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/sometimes_deleted_function.ll.expected</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 01:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Johannes Doerfert &lt;johannes@jdoerfert.de&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
