en Copyright 2015 Java http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected#40760060 [test] Use -passes in lit tests for the UpdateTestChecks toolThe UpdateTestChecks tool itself does not care about which passmanager that is used in the opt invocation. So the lit tests thatare verifying the behavior of the UpdateTestChecks tool is updatedto use the new-PM syntax (-passes=) when specifying the pass pipelinein the test cases that are used for verifying the UpdateTestCheckstool.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114517 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:51:19 +0000 Bjorn Pettersson <bjorn.a.pettersson@ericsson.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected#7128e647 [UpdateTestChecks] include { in function signature check lineAfter D85099, if we have attribute group in the function signature that hasn'tbeen seen before, and later a callsite with the same attribute group, filecheck will evaluatethe first attribute group to for example '#0 {'. We now include { in the args_and_sig group to avoid this.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86769 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:19:04 +0000 sstefan1 <sstipanovic@s-energize.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected#e5b87727 [utils] change default nameless value to "TMP"This is effectively reverting rGbfdc2552664d to avoid test churnwhile we figure out a better way forward.We at least salvage the warning on name conflict from that patchthough.If we change the default string again, we may want to mass updatetests at the same time. Alternatively, we could live with the poornaming if we change -instnamer.This also adds a test to LLVM as suggested in the post-commitreview. There's a clang test that is also affected. That seemslike a layering violation, but I have not looked at fixing that yet.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80584 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected Mon, 01 Jun 2020 10:49:07 +0000 Sanjay Patel <spatel@rotateright.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected#1698cc7e [Utils] Allow "on-the-fly" argument changes for update_test_check scriptsUpdate test scripts were limited because they performed a single actionon the entire file and if that action was controlled by arguments, likethe one introduced in D68819, there was no record of it.This patch introduces the capability of changing the arguments passed tothe script "on-the-fly" while processing a test file. In addition, an"on/off" switch was added so that processing can be disabled for partsof the file where the content is simply copied. The last extension is arecord of the invocation arguments in the auto generated NOTE. Thesearguments are also picked up in a subsequent invocation, allowingupdates with special options enabled without user interaction.To change the arguments the string `UTC_ARGS:` has to be present in aline, followed by "additional command line arguments". That iseverything that follows `UTC_ARGS:` will be added to a growing listof "command line arguments" which is reparsed after every update.Reviewed By: arichardsonDifferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69701 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected Fri, 01 Nov 2019 03:45:17 +0000 Johannes Doerfert <johannes@jdoerfert.de> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected#be26bd55 [Utils] Reuse argument variable names in the bodyIf we have `int foo(int a) { return a; }` and we run with --function-signatureenabled, we want a single variable declaration for `a` which is reusedlater.Reviewed By: lebedev.riDifferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69722 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:51:26 +0000 Johannes Doerfert <johannes@jdoerfert.de> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected#240aff80 Add initial tests for update_{llc_,cc_,}test_checks.pySummary:This commit adds basic tests for these update script to validate thatthey still work as expected. In the future we could extend these testswhenever new features are added to avoid introducing regressions.Reviewers: xbolva00, MaskRay, jdoerfertReviewed By: jdoerfertSubscribers: llvm-commitsTags: #llvmDifferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70660 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/llvm/test/tools/UpdateTestChecks/update_test_checks/Inputs/basic.ll.funcsig.expected Fri, 13 Dec 2019 10:25:15 +0000 Alex Richardson <Alexander.Richardson@cl.cam.ac.uk>