Changes in params.fail.cpp

76476efd - Rewording "static_assert" diagnostics

Mon, 25 Jul 2022 11:22:54 +0000

Rewording "static_assert" diagnosticsThis patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. Thischanges the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes someinstances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in thesource code.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/params.fail.cpp

1da31190 - Revert "Rewording the "static_assert" to static assertion"

Thu, 21 Jul 2022 13:39:22 +0000

Revert "Rewording the "static_assert" to static assertion"Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests thatare overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.This reverts commit 6542cb55a3eb115b1c3592514590a19987ffc498. List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/params.fail.cpp

6542cb55 - Rewording the "static_assert" to static assertion

Thu, 21 Jul 2022 13:32:54 +0000

Rewording the "static_assert" to static assertionThis patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement'soutput(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in Cshould not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better toreword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”failed in both C and C++.consider a c file having code_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");In clang the output is like::1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");^ ~1 error generated.Compiler returned: 1Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better toreword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gccprints as::1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!" 1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!"); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Compiler returned: 1The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewordingthe static_assert to static assertion.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/params.fail.cpp

da1609ad - Improve the formatting of static_assert messages

Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:13:19 +0000

Improve the formatting of static_assert messagesDisplay 'static_assert failed: message' instead of'static_assert failed "message"' to be consistentwith other implementations and be slightly morereadable.Reviewed By: #libc, aaron.ballman, philnik, MordanteDifferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128844 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/params.fail.cpp

344cef66 - [libc++] Granularize the header. NFCI.

Fri, 19 Nov 2021 19:58:51 +0000

[libc++] Granularize the header. NFCI.Actually there's one functional change here, which is that users canno longer depend on to include all of C++20 . Thatinclusion is so new that we believe nobody should be depending on ityet, even in the presence of Hyrum's Law. We keep the includes of ,, etc., so as not to break pre-C++20 Hyrum's Law users.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114281 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/params.fail.cpp

866b2795 - [libc++] s/_VSTD::is_unsigned/is_unsigned/ in . NFCI.

Mon, 10 May 2021 19:32:38 +0000

[libc++] s/_VSTD::is_unsigned/is_unsigned/ in . NFCI. List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/params.fail.cpp

7de9c61f - Fix test expectation to cope with custom version namespaces.

Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:41:19 +0000

Fix test expectation to cope with custom version namespaces. List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/params.fail.cpp

31dfaff3 - [libc++] Change requirements on linear_congruential_engine.

Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:23:22 +0000

[libc++] Change requirements on linear_congruential_engine.This patch changes how linear_congruential_engine picks its randomizationalgorithm. It adds two restrictions, `_OverflowOK` and `_SchrageOK`.`_OverflowOK` means that m is a power of two so using the classic`(a * x + c) % m` will create a meaningless overflow. The second checksthat Schrage's algorithm will produce results that are in bounds of minand max. This patch fixes https://llvm.org/PR27839.Differential Revision: D65041 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/params.fail.cpp