<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in illformed.verify.cpp</title>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2015</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator><item>
        <title>76476efd - Rewording &quot;static_assert&quot; diagnostics</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp#76476efd</link>
        <description>Rewording &quot;static_assert&quot; diagnosticsThis patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. Thischanges the wording to be more like GCC and uses &quot;static assertion&quot;when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes someinstances of &apos;static_assert&apos; to instead be based on the token in thesource code.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 11:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Muhammad Usman Shahid &lt;codesbyusman@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>1da31190 - Revert &quot;Rewording the &quot;static_assert&quot; to static assertion&quot;</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp#1da31190</link>
        <description>Revert &quot;Rewording the &quot;static_assert&quot; to static assertion&quot;Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests thatare overly specific in their dependency on clang&apos;s diagnostics.This reverts commit 6542cb55a3eb115b1c3592514590a19987ffc498.

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 13:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Erich Keane &lt;erich.keane@intel.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>6542cb55 - Rewording the &quot;static_assert&quot; to static assertion</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp#6542cb55</link>
        <description>Rewording the &quot;static_assert&quot; to static assertionThis patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement&apos;soutput(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in Cshould not report that static_assert failed. It&#8217;d probably be better toreword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say &#8220;static assertion&#8221;failed in both C and C++.consider a c file having code_Static_assert(0, &quot;oh no!&quot;);In clang the output is like:&lt;source&gt;:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!_Static_assert(0, &quot;oh no!&quot;);^              ~1 error generated.Compiler returned: 1Thus here the &quot;static_assert&quot; is not much good, it will be better toreword it to the &quot;static assertion failed&quot; to more generic. as the gccprints as:&lt;source&gt;:1:1: error: static assertion failed: &quot;oh no!&quot;    1 | _Static_assert(0, &quot;oh no!&quot;);          | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~          Compiler returned: 1The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewordingthe static_assert to static assertion.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 13:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Muhammad Usman Shahid &lt;codesbyusman@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>da1609ad - Improve the formatting of static_assert messages</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp#da1609ad</link>
        <description>Improve the formatting of static_assert messagesDisplay &apos;static_assert failed: message&apos; instead of&apos;static_assert failed &quot;message&quot;&apos; to be consistentwith other implementations and be slightly morereadable.Reviewed By: #libc, aaron.ballman, philnik, MordanteDifferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128844

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Corentin Jabot &lt;corentinjabot@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>d2baefae - [libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER &gt; 17. NFCI.</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp#d2baefae</link>
        <description>[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER &gt; 17. NFCI.All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER &gt; 17`. Similarly inthe tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2022 15:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Joe Loser &lt;joeloser93@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>504bc07d - [runtimes] Use int main(int, char**) consistently in tests</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp#504bc07d</link>
        <description>[runtimes] Use int main(int, char**) consistently in testsThis is needed when running the tests in Freestanding mode, where main()isn&apos;t treated specially. In Freestanding, main() doesn&apos;t get mangled asextern &quot;C&quot;, so whatever runtime we&apos;re using fails to find the entry point.One way to solve this problem is to define a symbol alias from __Z4mainiPPcto _main, however this requires all definitions of main() to have the samemangling. Hence this commit.

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 17:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Louis Dionne &lt;ldionne@apple.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>b5e896c0 - [libc++][pstl] Remove c++98 from UNSUPPORTED annotations</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp#b5e896c0</link>
        <description>[libc++][pstl] Remove c++98 from UNSUPPORTED annotationsc++98 isn&apos;t used by the test suite anymore, only c++03 is.

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Louis Dionne &lt;ldionne@apple.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>98eb1457 - [libc++] Require concepts support for &lt;numbers&gt;</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp#98eb1457</link>
        <description>[libc++] Require concepts support for &lt;numbers&gt;Similar to &lt;concepts&gt;, we need to protect the header and test againstinclusion and being run if concepts aren&apos;t supported by the compiler.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82171

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Raul Tambre &lt;raul@tambre.ee&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>4f6c4b47 - [libc++] Implement &lt;numbers&gt;</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp#4f6c4b47</link>
        <description>[libc++] Implement &lt;numbers&gt;Summary: Constants have 33 significant decimal digits for IEEE 754 128-bit floating-point numbers.Reviewers: ldionne, #libc, EricWF, zoecarver, curdeiusReviewed By: ldionne, #libc, curdeiusDifferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77505

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numbers/illformed.verify.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 07:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Raul Tambre &lt;raul@tambre.ee&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
