en Copyright 2015 Java http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/include/__verbose_abort#23690efc [libc++] Make __libcpp_verbose_abort [[noreturn]]This will allow using it in functions that are [[noreturn]] themselves.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131408(cherry picked from commit f5738c51452f90d7f33963d1c0c6f8e7f3d801e3) List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/include/__verbose_abort Mon, 08 Aug 2022 15:53:34 +0000 Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/include/__verbose_abort#2fb8f67e [libc++] Allow enabling assertions when back-deployingWhen back-deploying to older platforms, we can still provide assertions,but we might not be able to provide a great implementation for the verbosehandler. Instead, we can just call ::abort().Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131199(cherry picked from commit e36f9e13bca41223bd6af7e49bf020e58a676e9d) List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/include/__verbose_abort Thu, 04 Aug 2022 19:25:48 +0000 Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/include/__verbose_abort#3a55353f [libc++] Rename __libcpp_assertion_handler to __libcpp_verbose_abortWith the goal of reusing that handler to do other things besideshandling assertions (such as terminating when an exception is thrownunder -fno-exceptions), the name `__libcpp_assertion_handler` doesn'treally make sense anymore.Furthermore, I didn't want to use the name `__libcpp_abort_handler`,since that would give the impression that the handler is calledwhenever `std::abort()` is called, which is not the case at all.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130562(cherry picked from commit 507125af3d0b953cb56bce2e5b8000249fe1ef53) List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/libcxx/include/__verbose_abort Mon, 25 Jul 2022 17:43:47 +0000 Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>