en Copyright 2015 Java http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#a6b41d7c CWG issue 727: Fix numerous bugs in support for class-scope explicitspecializations for variable templates.llvm-svn: 359947 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Fri, 03 May 2019 23:51:38 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#59d0500b PR41607: Don't forget to substitute outer template arguments into aclass-scope explicit specialization of a class template.llvm-svn: 359266 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Fri, 26 Apr 2019 02:11:23 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#ddd279b9 [Sema] Fix an assert-on-invalid by avoiding function template specialisationdeduction for invalid functionsThe fabricated template parameters cause an assertion because their depthis invalid.rdar://34109988Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37341llvm-svn: 316778 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Fri, 27 Oct 2017 18:13:31 +0000 Alex Lorenz <arphaman@gmail.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#77e9e84a Don't mark a member as a member specialization until we know we're keeping the specialization.This improves our behavior in a few ways: * We now guarantee that if a member is marked as being a member specialization, there will actually be a member specialization declaration somewhere on its redeclaration chain. This fixes a crash in modules builds where we would try to check that there was a visible declaration of the member specialization and be surprised to not find any declaration of it at all. * We don't set the source location of the in-class declaration of the member specialization to the out-of-line declaration's location until we have actually finished merging them. This fixes some very silly looking diagnostics, where we'd point a "previous declaration is here" note at the same declaration we're complaining about. Ideally we wouldn't mess with the prior declaration's location at all, but too much code assumes that the first declaration of an entity is a reasonable thing to use as an indication of where it was declared, and that's not really true for a member specialization unless we fake it like this.llvm-svn: 302596 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Tue, 09 May 2017 23:02:10 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#650e5b28 Speculatively revert r295118 to see if it's what's causing the modules selfhost buildbots to fail.llvm-svn: 295146 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Wed, 15 Feb 2017 03:29:24 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#1d5f95f5 Do not implicitly instantiate the definition of a class template specializationthat has been explicitly specialized!We assume in various places that we can tell the template specialization kindof a class type by looking at the declaration produced by TagType::getDecl.That was previously not quite true: for an explicit specialization, we couldhave first seen a template-id denoting the specialization (with a use that doesnot trigger an implicit instantiation of the defintiion) and then seen thefirst explicit specialization declaration. TagType::getDecl would previouslyreturn an arbitrary declaration when called on a not-yet-defined class; itnow consistently returns the most recent declaration in that case.llvm-svn: 295118 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:27:44 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#64e033f9 Fix crash-on-invalid and name lookup when recovering from ~X::X() typo.llvm-svn: 226067 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:48:52 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#11a80dcb PR19340: If we see a declaration of a member of an unspecialized class templatethat looks like it might be an explicit specialization, don't recover as anexplicit specialization (bypassing the check that would reject that).llvm-svn: 206444 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Thu, 17 Apr 2014 03:52:20 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#3298368d PR18246: When performing template argument deduction to decide which templateis specialized by an explicit specialization, start from the first declarationin case we've got a member of a class template (redeclarations might not numberthe template parameters the same way).Our recover here is still far from ideal.llvm-svn: 197305 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:18:05 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#5001ec91 Add regression test for PR12331.llvm-svn: 185453 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:08:50 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#869853ee Instantiate class member template partial specialization declarationsin the order they occur within the class template, delayingout-of-line member template partial specializations until after theclass has been fully instantiated. This fixes a regression introducedby r118454 (itself a fix for PR8001).llvm-svn: 118704 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:44:59 +0000 Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#4e150f8d Fix some redundant errors by changing CXXScopeSpec::isSet calls intoisNotEmpty calls.llvm-svn: 100722 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:29:58 +0000 Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#1f476a17 Fix an assertion-on-error during tentative constructor parsing bypropagating error conditions out of the various annotate-me-a-snowflakeroutines. Generally (but not universally) removes redundant diagnosticsas well as, you know, not crashing on bad code. On the other hand,I have just signed myself up to fix fiddly parser errors for the nextweek. Again.llvm-svn: 97221 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:45:28 +0000 John McCall <rjmccall@apple.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#71ad477a Do not try to instantiate invalid declarations. It's a recipe fordisaster. Fixes PR6161.llvm-svn: 96371 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:28:15 +0000 Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#8fbe78f6 Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'. - This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable" which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set a default target).llvm-svn: 91446 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:14:24 +0000 Daniel Dunbar <daniel@zuster.org> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp#5013a7e4 When entering the scope of a declarator, make sure that the scope iscomplete (or, possibly causing template instantiation).Test this via some explicit specializations of member functions.llvm-svn: 82732 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:39:01 +0000 Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>