en Copyright 2015 Java http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/enum-unscoped-nonexistent.cpp#0838f3a1 Suppress bogus "use of undefined constexpr function" error if the function bodywas erroneous and got discarded.llvm-svn: 181758 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/enum-unscoped-nonexistent.cpp Tue, 14 May 2013 05:18:44 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/enum-unscoped-nonexistent.cpp#034185c2 The 'constexpr implies const' rule for non-static member functions is gone inC++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning forcode relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-writtentests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing ourimplementation of this rule.llvm-svn: 179969 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/enum-unscoped-nonexistent.cpp Sun, 21 Apr 2013 01:08:50 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/enum-unscoped-nonexistent.cpp#169f2190 Add a special-case diagnostic for one of the more obnoxious special cases ofunscoped enumeration members: an enumerator name which is visible in theout-of-class definition of a member of a templated class might not actuallyexist in the instantiation of that class, if the enumeration is also lexicallydefined outside the class definition and is explicitly specialized.Depending on the result of a CWG discussion, we may have a different resolutionfor a class of problems in this area, but this fixes the immediate issue of acrash-on-invalid / accepts-invalid (depending on +Asserts). Thanks to JohannesSchaub for digging into the standard wording to find how this case is currentlyspecified to behave.llvm-svn: 153461 List of files: /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/enum-unscoped-nonexistent.cpp Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:28:16 +0000 Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>