<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in deduced-return-void.cpp</title>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2015</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator><item>
        <title>7adb8588 - [clang] [NFC] More exhaustive tests for deducing void return types</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/deduced-return-void.cpp#7adb8588</link>
        <description>[clang] [NFC] More exhaustive tests for deducing void return typesDifferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119772

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/deduced-return-void.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 20:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Arthur O&apos;Dwyer &lt;arthur.j.odwyer@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>3c8d2aa8 - [clang] Don&apos;t emit redundant warnings for &apos;return;&apos;</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/deduced-return-void.cpp#3c8d2aa8</link>
        <description>[clang] Don&apos;t emit redundant warnings for &apos;return;&apos;when the function declaration&apos;s return type is already invalid forsome reason. This is relevant to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/49188because another way that the declaration&apos;s return type could becomeinvalid is that it might be `C auto` where `C&lt;void&gt;` is false.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119094

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/deduced-return-void.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2022 21:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Arthur O&apos;Dwyer &lt;arthur.j.odwyer@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
