<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in bitfield.cpp</title>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2015</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator><item>
        <title>5b571672 - Fix handling of preincrement on bit-fields. This gives a bit-field in C++, but</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/bitfield.cpp#5b571672</link>
        <description>Fix handling of preincrement on bit-fields. This gives a bit-field in C++, butwe were failing to find that bit-field when performing integer promotions. Thisbrings us closer to following the standard, and closer to GCC.In C, this change is technically a regression: we get bit-field promotionscompletely wrong in C, promoting cases that are categorically not bit-fielddesignators. This change makes us do so slightly more consistently, though.llvm-svn: 218428

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/SemaCXX/bitfield.cpp</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Richard Smith &lt;richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
