<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in std-c-library-functions-path-notes.c</title>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2015</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator><item>
        <title>f68c0a2f - [analyzer] Add path note tags to standard library function summaries.</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/Analysis/std-c-library-functions-path-notes.c#f68c0a2f</link>
        <description>[analyzer] Add path note tags to standard library function summaries.The patch is straightforward except the tiny fix in BugReporterVisitors.cppthat suppresses a default note for &quot;Assuming pointer value is null&quot; whena note tag from the checker is present. This is probably the right thing to dobut also definitely not a complete solution to the problem of different sourcesof path notes being unaware of each other, which is a large and annoying issuethat we have to deal with. Note tags really help there because they&apos;re nicelyintrospectable. The problem is demonstrated by the newly added getenv() test.Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122285

            List of files:
            /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/test/Analysis/std-c-library-functions-path-notes.c</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 04:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Artem Dergachev &lt;artem.dergachev@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
