<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in flush_utils.h</title>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2015</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator><item>
        <title>da650ada - selftests/powerpc: Add uaccess flush test</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/flush_utils.h#da650ada</link>
        <description>selftests/powerpc: Add uaccess flush testAlso based on the RFI and entry flush tests, it counts the L1D missesby doing a syscall that does user access: uname, in this case.Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo &lt;cascardo@canonical.com&gt;[dja: forward port, rename function]Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens &lt;dja@axtens.net&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210225061949.1213404-1-dja@axtens.net

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/flush_utils.h</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 06:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo &lt;cascardo@canonical.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>3a72c94e - selftests/powerpc: Fix L1D flushing tests for Power10</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/flush_utils.h#3a72c94e</link>
        <description>selftests/powerpc: Fix L1D flushing tests for Power10The rfi_flush and entry_flush selftests work by using the PM_LD_MISS_L1perf event to count L1D misses.  The value of this event has changedover time:- Power7 uses 0x400f0- Power8 and Power9 use both 0x400f0 and 0x3e054- Power10 uses only 0x3e054Rather than relying on raw values, configure perf to count L1D readmisses in the most explicit way available.This fixes the selftests to work on systems without 0x400f0 asPM_LD_MISS_L1, and should change no behaviour for systems that the testsalready worked on.The only potential downside is that referring to a specific perf eventrequires PMU support implemented in the kernel for that platform.Signed-off-by: Russell Currey &lt;ruscur@russell.cc&gt;Acked-by: Daniel Axtens &lt;dja@axtens.net&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210223070227.2916871-1-ruscur@russell.cc

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/flush_utils.h</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Russell Currey &lt;ruscur@russell.cc&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>0d239f3b - selftests/powerpc: refactor entry and rfi_flush tests</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/flush_utils.h#0d239f3b</link>
        <description>selftests/powerpc: refactor entry and rfi_flush testsFor simplicity in backporting, the original entry_flush test containeda lot of duplicated code from the rfi_flush test. De-duplicate that code.Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens &lt;dja@axtens.net&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/flush_utils.h</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 05:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Axtens &lt;dja@axtens.net&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
