<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in config</title>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2015</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator><item>
        <title>6952a4f6 - selftests: add pid namespace ENOMEM regression test</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/config#6952a4f6</link>
        <description>selftests: add pid namespace ENOMEM regression testWe recently regressed (cf. [1] and its corresponding fix in [2]) returningENOMEM when trying to create a process in a pid namespace whose initprocess/child subreaper has already died. This has caused confusion atleast once before that (cf. [3]). Let&apos;s add a simple regression test tocatch this in the future.[1]: 49cb2fc42ce4 (&quot;fork: extend clone3() to support setting a PID&quot;)[2]: b26ebfe12f34 (&quot;pid: Fix error return value in some cases&quot;)[3]: 35f71bc0a09a (&quot;fork: report pid reservation failure properly&quot;)Cc: Corey Minyard &lt;cminyard@mvista.com&gt;Cc: Oleg Nesterov &lt;oleg@redhat.com&gt;Cc: Adrian Reber &lt;areber@redhat.com&gt;Cc: Dmitry Safonov &lt;0x7f454c46@gmail.com&gt;Cc: Andrei Vagin &lt;avagin@gmail.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner &lt;christian.brauner@ubuntu.com&gt;

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/config</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2020 16:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Christian Brauner &lt;christian.brauner@ubuntu.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
