<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in perf-targz-src-pkg</title>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2015</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator><item>
        <title>ee84a303 - perf thread: Add accessor functions for thread</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/tools/perf/tests/perf-targz-src-pkg#ee84a303</link>
        <description>perf thread: Add accessor functions for threadUsing accessors will make it easier to add reference count checking inlater patches.Committer notes:thread-&gt;nsinfo wasn&apos;t wrapped as it is used together withnsinfo__zput(), where does a trick to set the field with a refcountbeing dropped to NULL, and that doesn&apos;t work well with usingthread__nsinfo(thread), that loses the &amp;thread-&gt;nsinfo pointer.When refcount checking is added to &apos;struct thread&apos;, later in thisseries, nsinfo__zput(RC_CHK_ACCESS(thread)-&gt;nsinfo) will be used tocheck the thread pointer.Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers &lt;irogers@google.com&gt;Cc: Adrian Hunter &lt;adrian.hunter@intel.com&gt;Cc: Alexander Shishkin &lt;alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com&gt;Cc: Ali Saidi &lt;alisaidi@amazon.com&gt;Cc: Andi Kleen &lt;ak@linux.intel.com&gt;Cc: Athira Rajeev &lt;atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;Cc: Brian Robbins &lt;brianrob@linux.microsoft.com&gt;Cc: Changbin Du &lt;changbin.du@huawei.com&gt;Cc: Dmitrii Dolgov &lt;9erthalion6@gmail.com&gt;Cc: Fangrui Song &lt;maskray@google.com&gt;Cc: German Gomez &lt;german.gomez@arm.com&gt;Cc: Ingo Molnar &lt;mingo@redhat.com&gt;Cc: Ivan Babrou &lt;ivan@cloudflare.com&gt;Cc: James Clark &lt;james.clark@arm.com&gt;Cc: Jing Zhang &lt;renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com&gt;Cc: Jiri Olsa &lt;jolsa@kernel.org&gt;Cc: John Garry &lt;john.g.garry@oracle.com&gt;Cc: K Prateek Nayak &lt;kprateek.nayak@amd.com&gt;Cc: Kan Liang &lt;kan.liang@linux.intel.com&gt;Cc: Leo Yan &lt;leo.yan@linaro.org&gt;Cc: Liam Howlett &lt;liam.howlett@oracle.com&gt;Cc: Mark Rutland &lt;mark.rutland@arm.com&gt;Cc: Miguel Ojeda &lt;ojeda@kernel.org&gt;Cc: Mike Leach &lt;mike.leach@linaro.org&gt;Cc: Namhyung Kim &lt;namhyung@kernel.org&gt;Cc: Naveen N. Rao &lt;naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;Cc: Peter Zijlstra &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;Cc: Ravi Bangoria &lt;ravi.bangoria@amd.com&gt;Cc: Sean Christopherson &lt;seanjc@google.com&gt;Cc: Steinar H. Gunderson &lt;sesse@google.com&gt;Cc: Suzuki Poulouse &lt;suzuki.poulose@arm.com&gt;Cc: Wenyu Liu &lt;liuwenyu7@huawei.com&gt;Cc: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;Cc: Yang Jihong &lt;yangjihong1@huawei.com&gt;Cc: Ye Xingchen &lt;ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn&gt;Cc: Yuan Can &lt;yuancan@huawei.com&gt;Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.orgCc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.orgLink: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608232823.4027869-4-irogers@google.comSigned-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo &lt;acme@redhat.com&gt;

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/tools/perf/tests/perf-targz-src-pkg</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Ian Rogers &lt;irogers@google.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>b2441318 - License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/tools/perf/tests/perf-targz-src-pkg#b2441318</link>
        <description>License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no licenseMany source files in the tree are missing licensing information, whichmakes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.By default all files without license information are under the defaultlicense of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.Update the files which contain no license information with the &apos;GPL-2.0&apos;SPDX license identifier.  The SPDX identifier is a legally bindingshorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart andPhilippe Ombredanne.How this work was done:Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset ofthe use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up caseswhere non-standard license headers were used, and references to licensehad to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied toa file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of theoutput of two independent scanners (ScanCode &amp; Windriver) producing SPDXtag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne.  Philippe prepared thebase worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 filesassessed.  Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scannerresults in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was notimmediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained &gt;5   lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if &lt;5   lines).All documentation files were explicitly excluded.The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX licenseidentifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn&apos;t find any license traces, file was   considered to have no license information in it, and the top level   COPYING file license applied.   For non */uapi/* files that summary was:   SPDX license identifier                            # files   ---------------------------------------------------|-------   GPL-2.0                                              11139   and resulted in the first patch in this series.   If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was &quot;GPL-2.0 WITH   Linux-syscall-note&quot; otherwise it was &quot;GPL-2.0&quot;.  Results of that was:   SPDX license identifier                            # files   ---------------------------------------------------|-------   GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        930   and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one   of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if   any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in   it (per prior point).  Results summary:   SPDX license identifier                            # files   ---------------------------------------------------|------   GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                       270   GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      169   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause)    21   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    17   LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      15   GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       14   ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    5   LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       4   LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        3   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT)              3   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT)             1   and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became   the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a   license but the other didn&apos;t, or they both detected different   licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file   resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and   which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was   confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,   the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later   in time.In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on thespreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to thesource files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmationby lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base fromFOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scannersdisagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights.  TheWindriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, sothey are related.Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheetsfor the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in thefiles he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checksin about 15000 files.In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to havecopy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect thecorrect identifier.Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manualinspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patchversion early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected   license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+   files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license   was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied   SPDX license was correctThis produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction.  Thisworksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for thedifferent types of files to be modified.These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg.  Thomas wrote a script toparse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in theformat that the file expected.  This script was further refined by Gregbased on the output to detect more types of files automatically and todistinguish between header and source .c files (which need differentcomment types.)  Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files togenerate the patches.Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart &lt;kstewart@linuxfoundation.org&gt;Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne &lt;pombredanne@nexb.com&gt;Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/tools/perf/tests/perf-targz-src-pkg</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 14:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>cde88355 - perf tests: Fix tarpkg build test error output redirection</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/tools/perf/tests/perf-targz-src-pkg#cde88355</link>
        <description>perf tests: Fix tarpkg build test error output redirectionSo we need to trow away just stdout, leaving stderr to be caught bythe build tests infrastructure, so that we can see what went wrongwhen the tarpkg build test fails:  $ make -C tools/perf build-test  make: Entering directory &apos;/home/acme/git/linux/tools/perf&apos;  - tarpkg: ./tests/perf-targz-src-pkg .  tests/make:302: recipe for target &apos;tarpkg&apos; failed  make[1]: *** [tarpkg] Error 2  Makefile:102: recipe for target &apos;build-test&apos; failed  make: *** [build-test] Error 2  make: Leaving directory &apos;/home/acme/git/linux/tools/perf&apos;  $ cat tools/perf/tarpkg  ./tests/perf-targz-src-pkg .    PERF_VERSION = 4.5.g05f5ec    PERF_VERSION = 4.5.g05f5ec  In file included from bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.S:9:0:  bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:5:29: fatal error: asm/cpufeatures.h: No such file or directory  compilation terminated.  mv: cannot stat &#8216;bench/.mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.o.tmp&#8217;: No such file or directory  make[5]: *** [bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.o] Error 1  make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....  make[4]: *** [bench] Error 2  make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....  make[3]: *** [perf-in.o] Error 2  make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....  make[2]: *** [all] Error 2  $So the test flow is:1. Run: &apos;make -C tools/perf build-test&apos;2. One of its tests failed, in this case, the &apos;tarpkg&apos; one3. Look at what went wrong, by looking at the output of that test, in   tools/perf/tarpkgAdmittedly, this should be shortcircuited to showing what went wrong directlyfrom the &apos;make build-test&apos; step, but lets first fix this tarpkg one and theproblem it spotted, which should be fixed by adding some extra file to thetools/perf/MANIFEST so that detached tarballs continue being self contained andbuild successfully.Cc: Adrian Hunter &lt;adrian.hunter@intel.com&gt;Cc: Borislav Petkov &lt;bp@suse.de&gt;Cc: Jiri Olsa &lt;jolsa@kernel.org&gt;Cc: Namhyung Kim &lt;namhyung@kernel.org&gt;Cc: Wang Nan &lt;wangnan0@huawei.com&gt;Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-ynld6egoxolmftcddpnd7oh6@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo &lt;acme@redhat.com&gt;

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/tools/perf/tests/perf-targz-src-pkg</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo &lt;acme@redhat.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>48878053 - perf tools: Add test for building detached source tarballs</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/tools/perf/tests/perf-targz-src-pkg#48878053</link>
        <description>perf tools: Add test for building detached source tarballsTest one of the main kernel Makefile targets to generate a perf sourcestarball suitable for build outside the full kernel sources.This is to test that the tools/perf/MANIFEST file lists all the filesneeded to be in such tarball, which sometimes gets broken when we movefiles around, like when we made some files that were in tools/perf/available to other tools/ codebases by moving it to tools/include/, etc.Now everytime we use &apos;make -C tools/perf -f tests/make&apos; this test willbe performed, helping detect such problems earlier in the devel cycle.Cc: Adrian Hunter &lt;adrian.hunter@intel.com&gt;Cc: David Ahern &lt;dsahern@gmail.com&gt;Cc: Frederic Weisbecker &lt;fweisbec@gmail.com&gt;Cc: Jiri Olsa &lt;jolsa@redhat.com&gt;Cc: Mike Galbraith &lt;efault@gmx.de&gt;Cc: Namhyung Kim &lt;namhyung@kernel.org&gt;Cc: Paul Mackerras &lt;paulus@samba.org&gt;Cc: Peter Zijlstra &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;Cc: Stephane Eranian &lt;eranian@google.com&gt;Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-gyivwbbu2j7c4j4pwpmttg2p@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo &lt;acme@redhat.com&gt;

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/tools/perf/tests/perf-targz-src-pkg</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo &lt;acme@redhat.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
