<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in Makefile</title>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2015</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator><item>
        <title>de9d1be4 - powerpc: Remove IBM_CELL_BLADE &amp; SPIDER_NET references</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#de9d1be4</link>
        <description>powerpc: Remove IBM_CELL_BLADE &amp; SPIDER_NET referencesThe symbols are no longer selectable so remove references to them.Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan &lt;maddy@linux.ibm.com&gt;Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241218105523.416573-4-mpe@ellerman.id.au

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 10:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>62f8f307 - powerpc/64: Remove maple platform</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#62f8f307</link>
        <description>powerpc/64: Remove maple platformThe maple platform was added in 2004 [1], to support the &quot;Maple&quot; 970FXevaluation board.It was later used for IBM JS20/JS21 machines, as well as the Biminimachine, aka &quot;Yellow Dog Powerstation&quot;.Sadly all those machines have passed into memory, and there&apos;s been noevidence for years that anyone is still using any of them.Remove the platform and related code. It can always be reinstated ifthere&apos;s interest.Note that this has no impact on support for 970FX based Power Macs.[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mpe/linux-fullhistory.git/commit/?id=f0d068d65c5e555ffcfbc189de32598f6f00770cSigned-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241013102957.548291-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>839ff58e - powerpc/boot: Remove all 40x platforms from boot</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#839ff58e</link>
        <description>powerpc/boot: Remove all 40x platforms from bootRemove 40x platforms from the boot directory.Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy &lt;christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20240628121201.130802-2-mpe@ellerman.id.au

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Christophe Leroy &lt;christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>b1992c37 - kbuild: use $(src) instead of $(srctree)/$(src) for source directory</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#b1992c37</link>
        <description>kbuild: use $(src) instead of $(srctree)/$(src) for source directoryKbuild conventionally uses $(obj)/ for generated files, and $(src)/ forchecked-in source files. It is merely a convention without any functionaldifference. In fact, $(obj) and $(src) are exactly the same, as definedin scripts/Makefile.build:    src := $(obj)When the kernel is built in a separate output directory, $(src) doesnot accurately reflect the source directory location. While Kbuildresolves this discrepancy by specifying VPATH=$(srctree) to search forsource files, it does not cover all cases. For example, when adding aheader search path for local headers, -I$(srctree)/$(src) is typicallypassed to the compiler.This introduces inconsistency between upstream and downstream Makefilesbecause $(src) is used instead of $(srctree)/$(src) for the latter.To address this inconsistency, this commit changes the semantics of$(src) so that it always points to the directory in the source tree.Going forward, the variables used in Makefiles will have the followingmeanings:  $(obj)     - directory in the object tree  $(src)     - directory in the source tree  (changed by this commit)  $(objtree) - the top of the kernel object tree  $(srctree) - the top of the kernel source treeConsequently, $(srctree)/$(src) in upstream Makefiles need to be replacedwith $(src).Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier &lt;nicolas@fjasle.eu&gt;

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2024 14:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>0ddbbb89 - powerpc: Fix typos</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#0ddbbb89</link>
        <description>powerpc: Fix typosFix typos, most reported by &quot;codespell arch/powerpc&quot;.  Only touchescomments, no code changes.Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas &lt;bhelgaas@google.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20240103231605.1801364-8-helgaas@kernel.org

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 23:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Bjorn Helgaas &lt;bhelgaas@google.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>b751ed04 - powerpc: drop MPC85xx_CDS platform support</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#b751ed04</link>
        <description>powerpc: drop MPC85xx_CDS platform supportThe MPC8541/8548/8555 Configurable Development System (CDS) were thevehicle used to provide evaluation of the 1st e500-v2 CPUs around 2007.Similar to the earlier MPC83xx-MDS systems we removed, the &quot;brains&quot;exist on a PCI-X card, but additional connectors exist to the right ofthe PCI-X slot, two structural metal pins are used to provide stabilityin a vertical ATX mounting, and the CPU is now on a daughter-card vs. aclamped down BGA.Given the extra complexity and risk of connector damage, the 8548CDSI had access to came pre-assembled in a basic white Antec case commonfor that era, and I&apos;m inclined to assume that was the default.Power was typical &quot;Pentium4&quot; 2005 ATX - the main 20 pin connector wentto the PCI ATX form factor backplane, and the 4 pin black/yellow wentto the CPU card.Like previous evaluation boards, they attempted to provide break-outconnectors for as many features as possible, and that made for a fairlycomplex looking system.In any case, these are over 15 years old, and fairly complex systems,originally made for a small group of industry related people, and madefor use where quiet fan operation wasn&apos;t important.  Given that, itmakes sense to remove support from them in 2023.Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230620043300.197546-3-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 04:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>384e338a - powerpc: drop MPC8540_ADS and MPC8560_ADS platform support</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#384e338a</link>
        <description>powerpc: drop MPC8540_ADS and MPC8560_ADS platform supportBased on the revision history in the manual(s), these e500-v1platforms were first available around 2002.Like a lot of evaluation boards, they attempted to provide break-outconnectors for all possible features, and that combined with fourPCI-X slots (and the age/era) meant for a considerably large board.As I recall it, from a Linux point of view, the biggest differencebetween 8540 and 8560 was in the UART implementation, and that isreflected in a diff of the defconfigs.In any case, these are over 20 years old, and by today&apos;s standardsonly have a small amount of DDR1 memory, and were not widely available.Given that, it makes sense to remove support from them in 2023.Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230620043300.197546-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 04:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>f5df87b8 - powerpc/build: Remove -pipe from compilation flags</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#f5df87b8</link>
        <description>powerpc/build: Remove -pipe from compilation flagsx86 removed -pipe in commit 437e88ab8f9e2 (&quot;x86/build: Remove -pipe fromKBUILD_CFLAGS&quot;) and the newer arm64 and riscv seem to have never used it,so that seems to be the way the world&apos;s going.Compile performance building defconfig on a POWER10 PowerNV systemwas in the noise after 10 builds each. No point in adding options unlessthey help something, so remove it.Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230606064830.184083-1-npiggin@gmail.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 06:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>8bce81db - powerpc/boot: Clean up Makefile after cflags and asflags separation</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#8bce81db</link>
        <description>powerpc/boot: Clean up Makefile after cflags and asflags separationTidy pass over boot Makefile. Move variables together where possible.Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230606064657.183969-5-npiggin@gmail.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 06:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>54194a2f - powerpc/boot: Separate BOOTCFLAGS from BOOTASFLAGS</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#54194a2f</link>
        <description>powerpc/boot: Separate BOOTCFLAGS from BOOTASFLAGSBOOTCFLAGS no longer contains anything that BOOTASFLAGS needs (except-pipe). Separate them to avoid fragility with cross-contamination offlags which has caused several build problems.Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whyWUdJDeOBN1hRWYSkQkvzYiQ5RbSW5rJjExgnbSNX9Q@mail.gmail.com/Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230606064657.183969-4-npiggin@gmail.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 06:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>d1b7d40d - powerpc/boot: Separate CPP flags from BOOTCFLAGS</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#d1b7d40d</link>
        <description>powerpc/boot: Separate CPP flags from BOOTCFLAGSAdd BOOTCPPFLAGS variable for the CPP options required by C and AS.Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230606064657.183969-3-npiggin@gmail.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 06:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>689d592e - powerpc/boot: Separate target flags from BOOTCFLAGS</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#689d592e</link>
        <description>powerpc/boot: Separate target flags from BOOTCFLAGSAdd BOOTTARGETFLAGS variable with target / ABI options common toCFLAGS and AFLAGS.Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230606064657.183969-2-npiggin@gmail.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 06:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>2b694fc9 - powerpc/boot: Disable power10 features after BOOTAFLAGS assignment</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#2b694fc9</link>
        <description>powerpc/boot: Disable power10 features after BOOTAFLAGS assignmentWhen building the boot wrapper assembly files with clang aftercommit 648a1783fe25 (&quot;powerpc/boot: Fix boot wrapper code generationwith CONFIG_POWER10_CPU&quot;), the following warnings appear for each filebuilt:  &apos;-prefixed&apos; is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)  &apos;-pcrel&apos; is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)While it is questionable whether or not LLVM should be emitting awarning when passed negative versions of code generation flags whenbuilding assembly files (since it does not emit a warning for thealtivec and vsx flags), it is easy enough to work around this by justmoving the disabled flags to BOOTCFLAGS after the assignment ofBOOTAFLAGS, so that they are not added when building assembly files.Do so to silence the warnings.Fixes: 648a1783fe25 (&quot;powerpc/boot: Fix boot wrapper code generation with CONFIG_POWER10_CPU&quot;)Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1839Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor &lt;nathan@kernel.org&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230427-remove-power10-args-from-boot-aflags-clang-v1-1-9107f7c943bc@kernel.org

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 19:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Nathan Chancellor &lt;nathan@kernel.org&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>859b21a0 - powerpc: drop PowerQUICC II Family ADS platform support</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#859b21a0</link>
        <description>powerpc: drop PowerQUICC II Family ADS platform supportBased on documentation revision dates, this MPC82xx pq2fads systempredates the MPC8272-ADS variant by about a year and only has 1/2the amount of RAM (32MB) -- largely making it useless with a modernv6.x kernel from today.Similar to the MPC8272-ADS the pq2fads also supported other 82xx CPUvariants, had 8MB flash, and like the 8272 ADS platform, was on a fairlylarge PCB in order to have space for breakout connectors for all features.These 82xx platforms are two decades old, and originally made for asmall group of industry related people in order to assist in new OEMboard designs.  Given that, it makes sense to remove support today.Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230224204959.17425-3-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 20:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>33777a4e - powerpc: drop MPC8272_ADS platform support</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#33777a4e</link>
        <description>powerpc: drop MPC8272_ADS platform supportThe MPC8272-ADS also supported other 82xx CPU variants, had 64MB RAM,8MB flash, and like the 85xx ADS platforms, was on a fairly large PCBin order to have space for breakout connectors for all the features.These 82xx platforms are two decades old, and originally made for asmall group of industry related people in order to assist in new OEMboard designs.  Given that, it makes sense to remove support today.Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230224204959.17425-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 20:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>f03425a5 - powerpc: drop HPC II (MPC7448) evaluation platform support.</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#f03425a5</link>
        <description>powerpc: drop HPC II (MPC7448) evaluation platform support.This was an interesting platform - it was the 1st instance of arespin of earlier 130nm 74xx CPUs on 90nm and systems using MPC7448were positioned as a rack server platform solution.Given that, the evaluation platform (at least the one I had) was shippedin a horizontal 1/2 height Antec desktop case with retro styling andcolours, despite the fact the docs explicitly stated that the HPC II isnot a desktop machine (noting it had no gfx or legacy PC I/O support).Historic trivia aside, this was the 1st introduction of the e600procfam as an evolution from the earlier G4.However even with the claim to being &quot;1st e600&quot; it seems the 2005+era was turning its attention to multicore support and from my memorythis poor guy was quickly overshadowed by the dual core MPC8641D.All that aside, we are once again looking at 15+ year old evaluationplatforms that were not widely distributed, so 2023 removal makes sense.Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230225201318.3682-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2023 20:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>b8fa3af2 - powerpc: drop MPC832x_MDS platform support</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#b8fa3af2</link>
        <description>powerpc: drop MPC832x_MDS platform supportThis final variant in the e300 family of Modular Development System(MDS) in this series was actually aimed at feature reduction - thingslike floating point and ethernet were removed in order to make for alower power and lower cost system.Like all the MDS systems, it was meant as a vehicle to get the CPU outearly to hardware OEMs so software and board development could take placein parallel.These were made in limited numbers and availability preference was givento partners who were planning to make their own boards.Given that the whole reason for existence was to assist in enabling newboard designs [not happening for 10+ years], and that they weren&apos;tgenerally available, and that the hardware wasn&apos;t really hobbyist friendlyeven for retro computing, it makes sense to retire the support for thisparticular platform.Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;Acked-by: Li Yang &lt;leoyang.li@nxp.com&gt;[mpe: Drop stale reference to MPC832x_MDS in arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile]Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230220115913.25811-5-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 01:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>7840b08a - powerpc: drop MPC836x_MDS platform support</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#7840b08a</link>
        <description>powerpc: drop MPC836x_MDS platform supportThis 2006 era Modular Development System (MDS) has, at its core component,a full length card with a PCI edge.  No case.  Serial and networkconnectors were on card, so it could optionally be fitted with plasticstand-offs and run stand-alone off a power brick.This is very similar to the MPC834x_MDS removed in the prior commit, butwith this board variant as an evolutionary step.  DDR2 was now an option,and the card edge was revised down to PCI-32 as PCI-64 never got traction.But overall the form factor and design goals were unchanged.Like all the MDS systems, it was meant as a vehicle to get the CPU outearly to hardware OEMs so software and board development could take placein parallel.To that end, the BGA CPU was held in place with a mechanical spring loadedpressure assembly (vs. solder) so that early rev silicon could be replacedin the field.  Not for COTS deployment!These were made in limited numbers and availability preference was givento partners who were planning to make their own boards.Given that the whole reason for existence was to assist in enabling newboard designs [not happening for 10+ years], and that they weren&apos;tgenerally available, and that the hardware wasn&apos;t really hobbyist friendlyeven for retro computing, it makes sense to retire the support for thisparticular platform.Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;Acked-by: Li Yang &lt;leoyang.li@nxp.com&gt;[mpe: Drop stale reference to MPC836x_MDS in arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile]Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230220115913.25811-3-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 01:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>da031017 - powerpc: drop MPC834x_MDS platform support</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#da031017</link>
        <description>powerpc: drop MPC834x_MDS platform supportThis 2006 era Modular Development System (MDS) has, at its corecomponent, a full length card with a PCI-64 edge.  No case.  Serialand network connectors were on card, so it could optionally be fittedwith plastic stand-offs and run stand-alone off a power brick.Like all the MDS systems, it was meant as a vehicle to get the CPUout early to hardware OEMs so software and board development couldtake place in parallel.To that end, the BGA CPU was held in place with a mechanical springloaded pressure assembly (vs. solder) so that early rev silicon couldbe replaced in the field.  Not for COTS deployment!These were made in limited numbers and availability preference wasgiven to partners who were planning to make their own boards, likeour WR SBC8349 [since retired in v4.18 (2017, commit 3bc6cf5a86e5)]Given that the whole reason for existence was to assist in enablingnew board designs [not happening for 10+ years], and that they weren&apos;tgenerally available, and that the hardware wasn&apos;t really hobbyistfriendly even for retro computing, it makes sense to retire thesupport for this platform.Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;Acked-by: Li Yang &lt;leoyang.li@nxp.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230220115913.25811-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 01:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
<item>
        <title>648a1783 - powerpc/boot: Fix boot wrapper code generation with CONFIG_POWER10_CPU</title>
        <link>http://172.16.0.5:8080/history/linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile#648a1783</link>
        <description>powerpc/boot: Fix boot wrapper code generation with CONFIG_POWER10_CPU-mcpu=power10 will generate prefixed and pcrel code by default, whichwe do not support. The general kernel disables these with cflags, butthose were missed for the boot wrapper.Fixes: 4b2a9315f20d (&quot;powerpc/64s: POWER10 CPU Kconfig build option&quot;)Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.1+Reported-by: Danny Tsen &lt;dtsen@linux.ibm.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman &lt;mpe@ellerman.id.au&gt;Link: https://msgid.link/20230407040909.230998-1-npiggin@gmail.com

            List of files:
            /linux-6.15/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 04:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Nicholas Piggin &lt;npiggin@gmail.com&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
