[WebAssembly] Fix a warning for an unused variable

`ErasedUncondBr` is used only in an `assert`, so it triggers a warning
on builds without assertions. Fixed.

[WebAssembly] Fix a bug in removing unnecessary branches

Summary:
One of the things `removeUnnecessaryInstrs()` in CFGStackify does is to
remove an unnecessary unconditinal branch before an EH pad.

[WebAssembly] Fix a bug in removing unnecessary branches

Summary:
One of the things `removeUnnecessaryInstrs()` in CFGStackify does is to
remove an unnecessary unconditinal branch before an EH pad. When there
is an unconditional branch right before a catch instruction and it
branches to the end of `end_try` marker, we don't need the branch,
because it there is no exception, the control flow transfers to
that point anyway.
```
bb0:
try
...
br bb2 <- Not necessary
bb1:
catch
...
bb2:
end
```

This applies when we have a conditional branch followed by an
unconditional one, in which case we should only remove the unconditional
branch. For example:
```
bb0:
try
...
br_if someplace_else
br bb2 <- Not necessary
bb1:
catch
...
bb2:
end
```

But `TargetInstrInfo::removeBranch` we used removed all existing
branches when there are multiple ones. This patch fixes it by only
deleting the last (= unconditional) branch manually.

Also fixes some `preds` comments in the test file.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80572

show more ...

TargetLowering.h - remove unnecessary TargetMachine.h include. NFC

Replace with forward declaration and move dependency down to source files that actually need it.

Both TargetLowering.h and TargetM

TargetLowering.h - remove unnecessary TargetMachine.h include. NFC

Replace with forward declaration and move dependency down to source files that actually need it.

Both TargetLowering.h and TargetMachine.h are 2 of the most expensive headers (top 10) in the ClangBuildAnalyzer report when building llc.

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Fix block marker placing after fixUnwindMismatches

Summary:
This fixes a few things that are connected. It is very hard to provide
an independent test case for each of those fixes, bec

[WebAssembly] Fix block marker placing after fixUnwindMismatches

Summary:
This fixes a few things that are connected. It is very hard to provide
an independent test case for each of those fixes, because they are
interconnected and sometimes one masks another. The provided test case
triggers some of those bugs below but not all.

---

1. Background:
`placeBlockMarker` takes a BB, and if the BB is a destination of some
branch, it places `end_block` marker there, and computes the nearest
common dominator of all predecessors (what we call 'header') and places
a `block` marker there.

When we first place markers, we traverse BBs from top to bottom. For
example, when there are 5 BBs A, B, C, D, and E and B, D, and E are
branch destinations, if mark the BB given to `placeBlockMarker` with `*`
and draw a rectangle representing the border of `block` and `end_block`
markers, the process is going to look like
```
-------
----- |-----|
--- |---| ||---||
|A| ||A|| |||A|||
--- --> |---| --> ||---||
*B | B | || B ||
C | C | || C ||
D ----- |-----|
E *D | D |
E -------
*E
```
which means when we first place markers, we go from inner to outer
scopes. So when we place a `block` marker, if the header already
contains other `block` or `try` marker, it has to belong to an inner
scope, so the existing `block`/`try` markers should go _after_ the new
marker. This was the assumption we had.

But after placing all markers we run `fixUnwindMismatches` function.
There we do some control flow transformation and create some branches,
and we call `placeBlockMarker` again to place `block`/`end_block`
markers for those newly created branches. We can't assume that we are
traversing branch destination BBs from top to bottom now because we are
basically inserting some new markers in the middle of existing markers.

Fix:
In `placeBlockMarker`, we don't have the assumption that the BB given is
in the order of top to bottom, and when placing `block` markers,
calculates whether existing `block` or `try` markers are inner or
outer scopes with respect to the current scope.

---

2. Background:
In `fixUnwindMismatches`, when there is a call whose correct unwind
destination mismatches the current destination after initially placing
`try` markers, we wrap that with a new nested `try`/`catch`/`end` and
jump to the correct handler within the new `catch`. The correct handler
code is split as a separate BB from its original EH pad so it can be
branched to. Here's an example:

- Before
```
mbb:
call @foo <- Unwind destination mismatch!
wrong-ehpad:
catch
...
cont:
end_try
...
correct-ehpad:
catch
[handler code]
```

- After
```
mbb:
try (new)
call @foo
nested-ehpad: (new)
catch (new)
local.set n / drop (new)
br %handleri (new)
nested-end: (new)
end_try (new)
wrong-ehpad:
catch
...
cont:
end_try
...
correct-ehpad:
catch
local.set n / drop (new)
handler: (new)
end_try
[handler code]
```

Note that after this transformation, it is possible there are no calls
to actually unwind to `correct-ehpad` here. `call @foo` now
branches to `handler`, and there can be no other calls to unwind to
`correct-ehpad`. In this case `correct-ehpad` does not have any
predecessors anymore.

This can cause a bug in `placeBlockMarker`, because we may need to place
`end_block` marker in `handler`, and `placeBlockMarker` computes the
nearest common dominator of all predecessors. If one of `handler`'s
predecessor (here `correct-ehpad`) does not have any predecessors, i.e.,
no way of reaching it, we cannot correctly compute the common dominator
of predecessors of `handler`, and end up placing no `block`/`end`
markers. This bug actually sometimes masks the bug 1.

Fix:
When we have an EH pad that does not have any predecessors after this
transformation, deletes all its successors, so that its successors don't
have any dangling predecessors.

---

3. Background:
Actually the `handler` BB in the example shown in bug 2 doesn't need
`end_block` marker, despite it being a new branch destination, because
it already has `end_try` marker which can serve the same purpose. I just
put that example there for an illustration purpose. There is a case we
actually need to place `end_block` marker: when the branch dest is the
appendix BB. The appendix BB is created when there is a call that is
supposed to unwind to the caller ends up unwinding to a wrong EH pad. In
this case we also wrap the call with a nested `try`/`catch`/`end`,
create an 'appendix' BB at the very end of the function, and branch to
that BB, where we rethrow the exception to the caller.

Fix:
When we don't actually need to place block markers, we don't.

---

4. In case we fall through to the continuation BB after the catch block,
after extracting handler code in `fixUnwindMismatches` (refer to bug 2
for an example), we now have to add a branch to it to bypass the
handler.
- Before
```
try
...
(falls through to 'cont')
catch
handler body
end
<-- cont
```

- After
```
try
...
br %cont (new)
catch
end
handler body
<-- cont
```

The problem is, we haven't been placing a new `end_block` marker in the
`cont` BB in this case. We should, and this fixes it. But it is hard to
provide a test case that triggers this bug, because the current
compilation pipeline from .ll to .s does not generate this kind of code;
we always have a `br` after `invoke`. But code without `br` is still
valid, and we can have that kind of code if we have some pipeline
changes or optimizations later. Even mir test cases cannot trigger this
part for now, because we don't encode auxiliary EH-related data
structures (such as `WasmEHFuncInfo`) in mir now. Those functionalities
can be added later, but I don't think we should block this fix on that.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79324

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Fix try placement in fixing unwind mismatches

Summary:
In CFGStackify, `fixUnwindMismatches` function fixes unwind destination
mismatches created by `try` marker placement. For example

[WebAssembly] Fix try placement in fixing unwind mismatches

Summary:
In CFGStackify, `fixUnwindMismatches` function fixes unwind destination
mismatches created by `try` marker placement. For example,
```
try
...
call @qux ;; This should throw to the caller!
catch
...
end
```
When `call @qux` is supposed to throw to the caller, it is possible that
it is wrapped inside a `catch` so in case it throws it ends up unwinding
there incorrectly. (Also it is possible `call @qux` is supposed to
unwind to another `catch` within the same function.)

To fix this, we wrap this inner `call @qux` with a nested
`try`-`catch`-`end` sequence, and within the nested `catch` body, branch
to the right destination:
```
block $l0
try
...
try ;; new nested try
call @qux
catch ;; new nested catch
local.set n ;; store exnref to a local
br $l0
end
catch
...
end
end
local.get n ;; retrieve exnref back
rethrow ;; rethrow to the caller
```

The previous algorithm placed the nested `try` right before the `call`.
But it is possible that there are stackified instructions before the
call from which the call takes arguments.
```
try
...
i32.const 5
call @qux ;; This should throw to the caller!
catch
...
end
```

In this case we have to place `try` before those stackified
instructions.
```
block $l0
try
...
try ;; this should go *before* 'i32.const 5'
i32.const 5
call @qux
catch
local.set n
br $l0
end
catch
...
end
end
local.get n
rethrow
```

We correctly handle this in the first normal `try` placement phase
(`placeTryMarker` function), but failed to handle this in this
`fixUnwindMismatches`.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77950

show more ...

Prune a LegacyDivergenceAnalysis and MachineLoopInfo include each

Now X86ISelLowering doesn't depend on many IR analyses.

llvm-svn: 375320

[WebAssembly] Allow multivalue types in block signature operands

Summary:
Renames `ExprType` to the more apt `BlockType` and adds a variant for
multivalue blocks. Currently non-void blocks are only

[WebAssembly] Allow multivalue types in block signature operands

Summary:
Renames `ExprType` to the more apt `BlockType` and adds a variant for
multivalue blocks. Currently non-void blocks are only generated at the
end of functions where the block return type needs to agree with the
function return type, and that remains true for multivalue
blocks. That invariant means that the actual signature does not need
to be stored in the block signature `MachineOperand` because it can be
inferred by `WebAssemblyMCInstLower` from the return type of the
parent function. `WebAssemblyMCInstLower` continues to lower block
signature operands to immediates when possible but lowers multivalue
signatures to function type symbols. The AsmParser and Disassembler
are updated to handle multivalue block types as well.

Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff, aardappel

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68889

llvm-svn: 374933

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Make returns variadic

Summary:
This is necessary and sufficient to get simple cases of multiple
return working with multivalue enabled. More complex cases will
require block and loop s

[WebAssembly] Make returns variadic

Summary:
This is necessary and sufficient to get simple cases of multiple
return working with multivalue enabled. More complex cases will
require block and loop signatures to be generalized to potentially be
type indices as well.

Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68684

llvm-svn: 374235

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Fix a bug in 'try' placement

Summary:
When searching for local expression tree created by stackified
registers, for 'block' placement, we start the search from the previous
instruction

[WebAssembly] Fix a bug in 'try' placement

Summary:
When searching for local expression tree created by stackified
registers, for 'block' placement, we start the search from the previous
instruction of a BB's terminator. But in 'try''s case, we should start
from the previous instruction of a call that can throw, or a EH_LABEL
that precedes the call, because the return values of the call's previous
instructions can be stackified and consumed by the throwing call.

For example,
```
i32.call @foo
call @bar ; may throw
br $label0
```
In this case, if we start the search from the previous instruction of
the terminator (`br` here), we end up stopping at `call @bar` and place
a 'try' between `i32.call @foo` and `call @bar`, because `call @bar`
does not have a return value so it is not a local expression tree of
`br`.

But in this case, unlike when placing 'block's, we should start the
search from `call @bar`, because the return value of `i32.call @foo` is
stackified and used by `call @bar`.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68619

llvm-svn: 374073

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Fix unwind mismatch stat computation

Summary:
There was a bug when computing the number of unwind destination
mismatches in CFGStackify. When there are many mismatched calls that
share

[WebAssembly] Fix unwind mismatch stat computation

Summary:
There was a bug when computing the number of unwind destination
mismatches in CFGStackify. When there are many mismatched calls that
share the same (original) destination BB, they have to be counted
separately.

This also fixes a typo and runs `fixUnwindMismatches` only when the wasm
exception handling is enabled. This is to prevent unnecessary
computations and does not change behavior.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68552

llvm-svn: 373975

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Unstackify regs after fixing unwinding mismatches

Summary:
Fixing unwind mismatches for exception handling can result in splicing
existing BBs and moving some of instructions to new BB

[WebAssembly] Unstackify regs after fixing unwinding mismatches

Summary:
Fixing unwind mismatches for exception handling can result in splicing
existing BBs and moving some of instructions to new BBs. In this case
some of stackified def registers in the original BB can be used in the
split BB. For example, we have this BB and suppose %r0 is a stackified
register.
```
bb.1:
%r0 = call @foo
... use %r0 ...
```

After fixing unwind mismatches in CFGStackify, `bb.1` can be split and
some instructions can be moved to a newly created BB:
```
bb.1:
%r0 = call @foo

bb.split (new):
... use %r0 ...
```

In this case we should make %r0 un-stackified, because its use is now in
another BB.

When spliting a BB, this CL unstackifies all def registers that have
uses in the new split BB.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68218

llvm-svn: 373301

show more ...

[webassembly] Apply llvm-prefer-register-over-unsigned from clang-tidy to LLVM

Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast

[webassembly] Apply llvm-prefer-register-over-unsigned from clang-tidy to LLVM

Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).

Reviewers: aheejin

Subscribers: jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision for whole review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962

llvm-svn: 368627

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Rename except_ref type to exnref

Summary:
We agreed to rename `except_ref` to `exnref` for consistency with other
reference types in
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/i

[WebAssembly] Rename except_ref type to exnref

Summary:
We agreed to rename `except_ref` to `exnref` for consistency with other
reference types in
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/issues/79. This also
renames WebAssemblyInstrExceptRef.td to WebAssemblyInstrRef.td in order
to use the file for other reference types in future.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64703

llvm-svn: 366145

show more ...

[WebAssembly] refactored utilities to not depend on MachineInstr

Summary:
Most of these functions can work for MachineInstr and MCInst
equally now.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: MatzeB, sbc100,

[WebAssembly] refactored utilities to not depend on MachineInstr

Summary:
Most of these functions can work for MachineInstr and MCInst
equally now.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: MatzeB, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64643

llvm-svn: 365965

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Fix unwind destination mismatches in CFG stackify

Summary:
Linearing the control flow by placing `try`/`end_try` markers can create
mismatches in unwind destinations. This patch resolv

[WebAssembly] Fix unwind destination mismatches in CFG stackify

Summary:
Linearing the control flow by placing `try`/`end_try` markers can create
mismatches in unwind destinations. This patch resolves these mismatches
by wrapping those instructions with an incorrect unwind destination with
a nested `try`/`catch`/`end_try` and branching to the right destination
within the new catch block.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sunfish, sbc100, jgravelle-google, chrib, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48345

llvm-svn: 357343

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Handle END_LOOP in unreachable BB in CFGStackify

Summary:
This fixes crashes when a BB in which an END_LOOP is to be placed is
unreachable and does not have any predecessors. Fixes PR4

[WebAssembly] Handle END_LOOP in unreachable BB in CFGStackify

Summary:
This fixes crashes when a BB in which an END_LOOP is to be placed is
unreachable and does not have any predecessors. Fixes PR41307.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: yurydelendik, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60004

llvm-svn: 357303

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Add CFGStacikfied field to WebAssemblyFunctionInfo

Summary:
This adds `CFGStackified` field and its serialization to
WebAssemblyFunctionInfo.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sunfish,

[WebAssembly] Add CFGStacikfied field to WebAssemblyFunctionInfo

Summary:
This adds `CFGStackified` field and its serialization to
WebAssemblyFunctionInfo.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sunfish, sbc100, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59747

llvm-svn: 357011

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Fix a bug when mixing TRY/LOOP markers

Summary:
When TRY and LOOP markers are in the same BB and END_TRY and END_LOOP
markers are in the same BB, END_TRY should be _before_ END_LOOP, b

[WebAssembly] Fix a bug when mixing TRY/LOOP markers

Summary:
When TRY and LOOP markers are in the same BB and END_TRY and END_LOOP
markers are in the same BB, END_TRY should be _before_ END_LOOP, because
LOOP is always before TRY if they are in the same BB. (TRY is placed in
the latest possible position, whereas LOOP is in the earliest possible
position.)

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sunfish, sbc100, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59751

llvm-svn: 357008

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Fix bugs in BLOCK/TRY placement

Summary:
Before we placed all TRY/END_TRY markers before placing BLOCK/END_BLOCK
markers. This couldn't handle this case:
```
bb0:
br bb2
bb1:

[WebAssembly] Fix bugs in BLOCK/TRY placement

Summary:
Before we placed all TRY/END_TRY markers before placing BLOCK/END_BLOCK
markers. This couldn't handle this case:
```
bb0:
br bb2
bb1: // nearest common dominator of bb3 and bb4
br_if ... bb3
br bb4
bb2:
...
bb3:
call @foo // unwinds to ehpad
bb4:
call @bar // unwinds to ehpad
ehpad:
catch
...
```

When we placed TRY markers, we placed it in bb1 because it is the
nearest common dominator of bb3 and bb4. But because bb0 jumps to bb2,
when we placed block markers, we ended up with interleaved scopes like
```
block
try
end_block
catch
end_try
```
which was not correct.

This patch fixes the bug by placing BLOCK and TRY markers in one pass
while iterating BBs in a function. This also adds some more routines to
`placeTryMarkers`, because we now have to assume that there can be
previously placed BLOCK and END_BLOCK.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sunfish, sbc100, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59739

llvm-svn: 357007

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Place 'try' and 'catch' correctly wrt EH_LABELs

Summary:
After instruction selection phase, possibly-throwing calls, which were
previously invoke, are wrapped in `EH_LABEL` instruction

[WebAssembly] Place 'try' and 'catch' correctly wrt EH_LABELs

Summary:
After instruction selection phase, possibly-throwing calls, which were
previously invoke, are wrapped in `EH_LABEL` instructions. For example:
```
EH_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp0>
CALL_VOID @foo ...
EH_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp1>
```

`EH_LABEL` is placed also in the beginning of EH pads:
```
bb.1 (landing-pad):
EH_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp2>
...
```

And we'd like to maintian this relationship, so when we place a `try`,
```
TRY ...
EH_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp0>
CALL_VOID @foo ...
EH_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp1>
```

When we place a `catch`,
```
bb.1 (landing-pad):
EH_LABEL <mcsymbol .Ltmp2>
%0:except_ref = CATCH ...
...
```

Previously we didn't treat EH_LABELs specially, so `try` was placed
right before a call, and `catch` was placed in the beginning of an EH
pad.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58914

llvm-svn: 355996

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Simplify iterator navigations (NFC)

Summary:
- Replaces some uses of `MachineFunction::iterator(MBB)` with
`MBB->getIterator()` and `MachineBasicBlock::iterator(MI)` with
`MI->getI

[WebAssembly] Simplify iterator navigations (NFC)

Summary:
- Replaces some uses of `MachineFunction::iterator(MBB)` with
`MBB->getIterator()` and `MachineBasicBlock::iterator(MI)` with
`MI->getIterator()`, which are simpler.
- Replaces some uses of `std::prev` of `std::next` that takes a
MachineFunction or MachineBasicBlock iterator with `getPrevNode` and
`getNextNode`, which are also simpler.

Reviewers: sbc100

Subscribers: dschuff, sunfish, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58913

llvm-svn: 355444

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Fix ScopeTops info in CFGStackify for EH pads

Summary:
When creating `ScopeTops` info for `try` ~ `catch` ~ `end_try`, we
should create not only `end_try` -> `try` mapping but also `ca

[WebAssembly] Fix ScopeTops info in CFGStackify for EH pads

Summary:
When creating `ScopeTops` info for `try` ~ `catch` ~ `end_try`, we
should create not only `end_try` -> `try` mapping but also `catch` ->
`try` mapping as well. If this is not created, `block` and `end_block`
markers later added may span across an existing `catch`, resulting in
the incorrect code like:
```
try
block --| (X)
catch |
end_block --|
end_try
```

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sunfish, sbc100, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58605

llvm-svn: 354945

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Remove unnecessary instructions after TRY marker placement

Summary:
This removes unnecessary instructions after TRY marker placement. There
are two cases:
- `end`/`end_block` can be re

[WebAssembly] Remove unnecessary instructions after TRY marker placement

Summary:
This removes unnecessary instructions after TRY marker placement. There
are two cases:
- `end`/`end_block` can be removed if they overlap with `try`/`end_try`
and they have the same return types.
- `br` right before `catch` that branches to after `end_try` can be
deleted.

Reviewers: dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58591

llvm-svn: 354939

show more ...

[WebAssembly] Rename a variable in CFGStackify (NFC)

llvm-svn: 354744

[WebAssembly] Merge two identical switch case routines into one (NFC)

llvm-svn: 354743