History log of /llvm-project-15.0.7/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp (Results 426 – 450 of 1262)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.0, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc4
# eeaec265 14-Feb-2015 David Majnemer <[email protected]>

Try to unbreak the Hexagon bot

llvm-svn: 229219


# ce27e42d 14-Feb-2015 David Majnemer <[email protected]>

CodeGen: _Atomic(_Complex) shouldn't crash

We could be a little kinder if we did a compare-exchange loop instead of
an atomic-load/store pair.

llvm-svn: 229212


# a5b195a1 14-Feb-2015 David Majnemer <[email protected]>

Revert "Revert r229082 for a bit, it caused PR22577."

This reverts commit r229123. It was a red herring, the bug was present
without r229082.

llvm-svn: 229205


# 6866a3c6 14-Feb-2015 David Majnemer <[email protected]>

CodeGen: Correctly convert atomic bool from i8 to i1

Bools are a little tricky, they are i8 in memory and must be coerced
back to i1 before further operations can be performed on them.

This fixes P

CodeGen: Correctly convert atomic bool from i8 to i1

Bools are a little tricky, they are i8 in memory and must be coerced
back to i1 before further operations can be performed on them.

This fixes PR22577.

llvm-svn: 229204

show more ...


# 7ce96b85 13-Feb-2015 Nico Weber <[email protected]>

Revert r229082 for a bit, it caused PR22577.

llvm-svn: 229123


# abc482ef 13-Feb-2015 David Majnemer <[email protected]>

MS ABI: Implement /volatile:ms

The /volatile:ms semantics turn volatile loads and stores into atomic
acquire and release operations. This distinction is important because
volatile memory operations

MS ABI: Implement /volatile:ms

The /volatile:ms semantics turn volatile loads and stores into atomic
acquire and release operations. This distinction is important because
volatile memory operations do not form a happens-before relationship
with non-atomic memory. This means that a volatile store is not
sufficient for implementing a mutex unlock routine.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7580

llvm-svn: 229082

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc2
# 9f7ae2c9 25-Jan-2015 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

DebugInfo: Attribute calls to overloaded operators with the operator, not the start of the whole expression

llvm-svn: 227028


# 9b479666 25-Jan-2015 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

DebugInfo: Use the preferred location rather than the start location for expression line info

This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the
LHS when attributing the store in

DebugInfo: Use the preferred location rather than the start location for expression line info

This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the
LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example.

There were essentially 3 options for this:

* The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this
commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce
around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression,
etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be
where the actual addition occurred)).

* The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and
certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that
progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for
independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders,
etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y
and z after the respective loads.
The problem with this is that the user would still have to think
fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being
evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan
backtrace.

* The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what
you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going
'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in
lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+
were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will
point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of
its operands.

(actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons,
but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex
assignments and other plain operators right)

llvm-svn: 227027

show more ...


# 2d321fb7 24-Jan-2015 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

DebugInfo: Correct the line location of geps on array accesses

llvm-svn: 227023


# a1fd0995 23-Jan-2015 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

DebugInfo: Remove outdated comment. Column info is no longer needed to differentiate inline callsites.

llvm-svn: 226955


# 835afb20 21-Jan-2015 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

DebugInfo: Remove forced column-info workaround for inlined calls

This workaround was to provide unique call sites to ensure LLVM's inline
debug info handling would properly unique two calls to the

DebugInfo: Remove forced column-info workaround for inlined calls

This workaround was to provide unique call sites to ensure LLVM's inline
debug info handling would properly unique two calls to the same function
on the same line. Instead, this has now been fixed in LLVM (r226736) and
the workaround here can be removed.

Originally committed in r176895, but this isn't a straight revert due to
all the changes since then. I just searched for anything ForcedColumn*
related and removed them.

We could test this - but it didn't strike me as terribly valuable once
we're no longer adding this workaround everything just works as expected
& it's no longer a special case to test for.

llvm-svn: 226738

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.0-rc1
# 0d9593dd 14-Jan-2015 Chandler Carruth <[email protected]>

[cleanup] Re-sort *all* #include lines with llvm/utils/sort_includes.py

Sorry for the noise, I managed to miss a bunch of recent regressions of
include orderings here. This should actually sort all

[cleanup] Re-sort *all* #include lines with llvm/utils/sort_includes.py

Sorry for the noise, I managed to miss a bunch of recent regressions of
include orderings here. This should actually sort all the includes for
Clang. Again, no functionality changed, this is just a mechanical
cleanup that I try to run periodically to keep the #include lines as
regular as possible across the project.

llvm-svn: 225979

show more ...


# 66e4197f 14-Jan-2015 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

Reapply r225000 (reverted in r225555): DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling (and follow-up commits).

Several pieces of code were relying on implicit debug location setting
which usuall

Reapply r225000 (reverted in r225555): DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling (and follow-up commits).

Several pieces of code were relying on implicit debug location setting
which usually lead to incorrect line information anyway. So I've fixed
those (in r225955 and r225845) separately which should pave the way for
this commit to be cleanly reapplied.

The reason these implicit dependencies resulted in crashes with this
patch is that the debug location would no longer implicitly leak from
one place to another, but be set back to invalid. Once a call with
no/invalid location was emitted, if that call was ever inlined it could
produce invalid debugloc chains and assert during LLVM's codegen.

There may be further cases of such bugs in this patch - they're hard to
flush out with regression testing, so I'll keep an eye out for reports
and investigate/fix them ASAP if they come up.

Original commit message:

Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling"

Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns
this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the
crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling
changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of
the more general solution).

Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash
when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out
the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to
inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call
instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and
must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the
change.

Original commit message:

This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for
subexpressions.

This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the
SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting
was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end
of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope
than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The
drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally
CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current
SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm
going to tackle removing that just now.

I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll
investigate that as it comes up.

Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug
in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for
statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one
statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and
two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one
statement.

I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would
help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each
statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the
lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some
problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers.

llvm-svn: 225956

show more ...


# 8845952b 12-Jan-2015 Alexey Samsonov <[email protected]>

Reimplement -fsanitize-recover family of flags.

Introduce the following -fsanitize-recover flags:
- -fsanitize-recover=<list>: Enable recovery for selected checks or
group of checks. It is f

Reimplement -fsanitize-recover family of flags.

Introduce the following -fsanitize-recover flags:
- -fsanitize-recover=<list>: Enable recovery for selected checks or
group of checks. It is forbidden to explicitly list unrecoverable
sanitizers here (that is, "address", "unreachable", "return").
- -fno-sanitize-recover=<list>: Disable recovery for selected checks or
group of checks.
- -f(no-)?sanitize-recover is now a synonym for
-f(no-)?sanitize-recover=undefined,integer and will soon be deprecated.

These flags are parsed left to right, and mask of "recoverable"
sanitizer is updated accordingly, much like what we do for -fsanitize= flags.
-fsanitize= and -fsanitize-recover= flag families are independent.

CodeGen change: If there is a single UBSan handler function, responsible
for implementing multiple checks, which have different recoverable setting,
then we emit two handler calls instead of one:
the first one for the set of "unrecoverable" checks, another one - for
set of "recoverable" checks. If all checks implemented by a handler have the
same recoverability setting, then the generated code will be the same.

llvm-svn: 225719

show more ...


# 19acc3d3 12-Jan-2015 Alexey Bataev <[email protected]>

Rename RefersToCapturedVariable to RefersToEnclosingVariableOrCapture, NFC

llvm-svn: 225624


# f353d3ec 09-Jan-2015 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

Revert "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling" and related commits

This reverts commit r225000, r225021, r225083, r225086, r225090.

The root change (r225000) still has several issues w

Revert "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling" and related commits

This reverts commit r225000, r225021, r225083, r225086, r225090.

The root change (r225000) still has several issues where it's caused
calls to be emitted without debug locations. This causes assertion
failures if/when those calls are inlined.

I'll work up some test cases and fixes before recommitting this.

llvm-svn: 225555

show more ...


# 602cfe7d 01-Jan-2015 David Majnemer <[email protected]>

CodeGen: Don't crash when a lambda uses a local constexpr variable

The DeclRefExpr might be for a variable initialized by a constant
expression which hasn't been ODR used.
Emit the initializer for t

CodeGen: Don't crash when a lambda uses a local constexpr variable

The DeclRefExpr might be for a variable initialized by a constant
expression which hasn't been ODR used.
Emit the initializer for the variable instead of trying to capture the
variable itself.

This fixes PR22071.

llvm-svn: 225060

show more ...


# 84fe79cf 30-Dec-2014 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling"

Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns
this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fi

Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling"

Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns
this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the
crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling
changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of
the more general solution).

Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash
when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out
the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to
inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call
instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and
must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the
change.

Original commit message:

This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for
subexpressions.

This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the
SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting
was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end
of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope
than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The
drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally
CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current
SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm
going to tackle removing that just now.

I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll
investigate that as it comes up.

Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug
in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for
statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one
statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and
two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one
statement.

I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would
help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each
statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the
lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some
problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers.

llvm-svn: 225000

show more ...


# 608a2450 29-Dec-2014 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

Revert "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling"

Asserting when building compiler-rt when using a GCC host compiler.
Reverting while I investigate.

This reverts commit r224941.

llvm-svn

Revert "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling"

Asserting when building compiler-rt when using a GCC host compiler.
Reverting while I investigate.

This reverts commit r224941.

llvm-svn: 224970

show more ...


# 3945d1bd 29-Dec-2014 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling"

Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns
this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fi

Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling"

Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns
this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the
crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling
changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of
the more general solution).

Original commit message:

This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for
subexpressions.

This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the
SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting
was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end
of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope
than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The
drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally
CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current
SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm
going to tackle removing that just now.

I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll
investigate that as it comes up.

Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug
in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for
statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one
statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and
two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one
statement.

I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would
help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each
statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the
lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some
problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers.

llvm-svn: 224941

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-3.5.1, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc2
# 06b2c54d 17-Dec-2014 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

Revert "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling"

Fails an ASan bootstrap - I'll try to reproduce locally & sort that out
before recommitting.

This reverts commit r224385.

llvm-svn: 2244

Revert "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling"

Fails an ASan bootstrap - I'll try to reproduce locally & sort that out
before recommitting.

This reverts commit r224385.

llvm-svn: 224441

show more ...


# bf22a4ea 16-Dec-2014 David Blaikie <[email protected]>

DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling

This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several co

DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling

This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for
subexpressions.

This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the
SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting
was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end
of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope
than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The
drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally
CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current
SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm
going to tackle removing that just now.

I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll
investigate that as it comes up.

Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug
in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for
statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one
statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and
two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one
statement.

I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would
help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each
statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the
lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some
problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers.

llvm-svn: 224385

show more ...


# 07649fb7 16-Dec-2014 Alexey Bataev <[email protected]>

Renamed RefersToEnclosingLocal bitfield to RefersToCapturedVariable.
Bitfield RefersToEnclosingLocal of Stmt::DeclRefExprBitfields renamed to RefersToCapturedVariable to reflect latest changes introd

Renamed RefersToEnclosingLocal bitfield to RefersToCapturedVariable.
Bitfield RefersToEnclosingLocal of Stmt::DeclRefExprBitfields renamed to RefersToCapturedVariable to reflect latest changes introduced in commit 224323. Also renamed method Expr::refersToEnclosingLocal() to Expr::refersToCapturedVariable() and comments for constant arguments.
No functional changes.

llvm-svn: 224329

show more ...


# f841bd9f 16-Dec-2014 Alexey Bataev <[email protected]>

[OPENMP] Bugfix for processing of global variables in OpenMP regions.
Currently, if global variable is marked as a private OpenMP variable, the compiler crashes in debug version or generates incorrec

[OPENMP] Bugfix for processing of global variables in OpenMP regions.
Currently, if global variable is marked as a private OpenMP variable, the compiler crashes in debug version or generates incorrect code in release version. It happens because in the OpenMP region the original global variable is used instead of the generated private copy. It happens because currently globals variables are not captured in the OpenMP region.
This patch adds capturing of global variables iff private copy of the global variable must be used in the OpenMP region.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6259

llvm-svn: 224323

show more ...


# f770683f 12-Dec-2014 Peter Collingbourne <[email protected]>

Implement the __builtin_call_with_static_chain GNU extension.

The extension has the following syntax:

__builtin_call_with_static_chain(Call, Chain)
where Call must be a function call expression

Implement the __builtin_call_with_static_chain GNU extension.

The extension has the following syntax:

__builtin_call_with_static_chain(Call, Chain)
where Call must be a function call expression and Chain must be of pointer type

This extension performs a function call Call with a static chain pointer
Chain passed to the callee in a designated register. This is useful for
calling foreign language functions whose ABI uses static chain pointers
(e.g. to implement closures).

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6332

llvm-svn: 224167

show more ...


1...<<11121314151617181920>>...51